Veterinary · head to head
ImproMed vs Practice Fusion
ImproMed
Veterinary
On-premise Windows practice management with deep inventory and financial reporting, now inside Covetrus
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Practice Fusion has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ImproMed it is a server-based Windows product, so the practice owns the hardware, the SQL database, the patching and the backup regime, and those costs never appear in the software quotation.; Practice Fusion cloud-based architecture requires constant internet connectivity
- They diverge on capability: ImproMed covers Multi-location inventory, Practice Fusion covers Electronic Health Records.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ImproMed and Practice Fusion actually diverge.
| Attribute | ImproMed | Practice Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Veterinary | Healthcare |
| Founded | Unknown | 2005 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ImproMed
- Multi-location inventory
- Production reporting
- Wellness plans
- Laboratory and imaging integration
- On-premise deployment
- Covetrus prescription management
Only in Practice Fusion
- Electronic Health Records
- e-Prescribing
- Lab Orders
- Patient Portal
- Scheduling
- Labs
- Pharmacies
- Imaging Centers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ImproMed
- A multi-doctor hospital carrying significant inventory value that needs reorder points and vendor price comparisonnot Practice Fusion
- A practice manager who has to analyse production by veterinary surgeon and reconcile it against the general ledgernot Practice Fusion
- A hospital in an area with unreliable internet that will not put the appointment book and records on a cloud connectionnot Practice Fusion
- A small group running wellness plans that need recurring billing and compliance tracking against patientsnot Practice Fusion
Practice Fusion
- Small to medium medical practicesnot ImproMed
- Primary care clinicsnot ImproMed
- Independent clinicians needing electronic chartingnot ImproMed
- Practice management and billing workflowsnot ImproMed
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ImproMed
- It is a server-based Windows product, so the practice owns the hardware, the SQL database, the patching and the backup regime, and those costs never appear in the software quotation.
- Covetrus markets Pulse as its strategic cloud platform while holding three legacy practice management systems, so ask directly what development ImproMed still receives and get the support commitment and end-of-life notice period in writing.
- Remote and mobile access is weak compared with cloud systems, which matters for on-call work, home record review and multi-site groups sharing patients.
- The interface is dense and dated, and training a new receptionist or technician on it takes materially longer than on a modern cloud system.
- If Covetrus does steer customers to Pulse, the migration is a full data conversion with retraining, so the cost of the eventual move should be priced into the decision now rather than later.
Practice Fusion
- Cloud-based architecture requires constant internet connectivity
- Requires annual commitment for pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
ImproMed
On request- ImproMed Infinity$undefined/year
- Quoted per practice with a licence and an annual support agreement
- Server hardware and database licensing are the responsibility of the practice
- Data conversion and training charged separately
Practice Fusion
Free- Standard$199/month
- Provider license with e-prescribing and chart signing
- 3 signing staff licenses included
- Unlimited non-signing staff licenses
Which should you pick?
Choose ImproMed if
- You need multi-location inventory.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want production reporting.
Choose Practice Fusion if
- You need electronic health records.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want e-prescribing.
Questions people ask
- Is ImproMed or Practice Fusion better?
- Neither clearly leads. ImproMed starts at On request and Practice Fusion at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ImproMed or Practice Fusion?
- Practice Fusion has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for ImproMed and Free for Practice Fusion.
- Does ImproMed or Practice Fusion run on more platforms?
- ImproMed runs on Windows. Practice Fusion runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Practice Fusion for free?
- Yes. Practice Fusion has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. ImproMed starts at On request.
- What is ImproMed best used for?
- ImproMed is most often used for a multi-doctor hospital carrying significant inventory value that needs reorder points and vendor price comparison, a practice manager who has to analyse production by veterinary surgeon and reconcile it against the general ledger, a hospital in an area with unreliable internet that will not put the appointment book and records on a cloud connection, a small group running wellness plans that need recurring billing and compliance tracking against patients. Of those, a multi-doctor hospital carrying significant inventory value that needs reorder points and vendor price comparison and a practice manager who has to analyse production by veterinary surgeon and reconcile it against the general ledger are not what Practice Fusion is typically brought in for.
- What can ImproMed do that Practice Fusion cannot?
- ImproMed covers Multi-location inventory, Production reporting, Wellness plans, Laboratory and imaging integration. Practice Fusion covers Electronic Health Records, e-Prescribing, Lab Orders, Patient Portal.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ImproMed: Is ImproMed still being developed?
Ask Covetrus for a release history and a written support commitment. Pulse is the stated strategic cloud product, and ImproMed, AVImark and RxWorks are all legacy systems in the same portfolio.
Practice Fusion: How much does Practice Fusion cost?
Practice Fusion starts at $199 per month per provider with an annual commitment required. The pricing includes 3 signing staff licenses and unlimited non-signing staff licenses.
SourceImproMed: Can it run in the cloud?
It is designed for an on-premise server. Hosting it on a remote desktop service is possible but it is not a native cloud application and does not behave like one.
Practice Fusion: Does Practice Fusion offer a free trial?
Yes, Practice Fusion offers a complimentary 2-week trial with no commitment, no upfront costs, and no credit card required.
SourceImproMed: What is it better at than cloud alternatives?
Inventory control and financial and production reporting. Practices with high stock value and several veterinary surgeons are the ones that notice the difference.
ImproMed: What happens to my data if we move to Pulse?
A conversion project. Establish before signing what Covetrus will convert, what it will not, and who pays for it.
Related pages
More on Practice Fusion
Other head to heads
- ImproMed vs ezyVet
- ImproMed vs IDEXX Cornerstone
- ImproMed vs Animana
- ImproMed vs Onward Vet
- ImproMed vs VIA Veterinary
- ImproMed vs Provet Cloud
- ImproMed vs Instinct Science
- ImproMed vs Talkatoo
- ImproMed vs Shepherd
- ImproMed vs Digitail
- ImproMed vs PetDesk
- ImproMed vs VetBadger
- ImproMed vs IDEXX Neo
- ImproMed vs Vet Radar
- ImproMed vs Athenahealth
- ImproMed vs Epic Systems
- ImproMed vs Cerner
- ImproMed vs Amwell
- ImproMed vs DrChrono
- ImproMed vs Kareo Clinical
- ImproMed vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- ImproMed vs ChiroTouch
- ImproMed vs NextGen Healthcare
- ImproMed vs WebPT
- ImproMed vs eClinicalWorks
- ImproMed vs Healthie
- ImproMed vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- ImproMed vs PioneerRx
- ImproMed vs Rad AI
- ImproMed vs Aidoc
- ImproMed vs Annalise.ai
- ImproMed vs Rx30
- Practice Fusion vs ezyVet
- Practice Fusion vs IDEXX Cornerstone
- Practice Fusion vs Animana
- Practice Fusion vs Onward Vet
- Practice Fusion vs VIA Veterinary
- Practice Fusion vs Provet Cloud
- Practice Fusion vs Instinct Science
- Practice Fusion vs Talkatoo
- Practice Fusion vs Shepherd
- Practice Fusion vs Digitail
- Practice Fusion vs PetDesk
- Practice Fusion vs VetBadger
- Practice Fusion vs IDEXX Neo
- Practice Fusion vs Vet Radar
- Practice Fusion vs Athenahealth
- Practice Fusion vs Epic Systems
- Practice Fusion vs Cerner
- Practice Fusion vs Amwell
- Practice Fusion vs DrChrono
- Practice Fusion vs Kareo Clinical
- Practice Fusion vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Practice Fusion vs ChiroTouch
- Practice Fusion vs NextGen Healthcare
- Practice Fusion vs WebPT
- Practice Fusion vs eClinicalWorks
- Practice Fusion vs Healthie
- Practice Fusion vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Practice Fusion vs PioneerRx
- Practice Fusion vs Rad AI
- Practice Fusion vs Aidoc
- Practice Fusion vs Annalise.ai
- Practice Fusion vs Rx30

