Healthcare · head to head
Kareo Clinical vs Onward Vet

Kareo Clinical
Healthcare
Specialized EHR and practice management for independent and small practices
- From
- $89/month
- Rated
- -

Onward Vet
Veterinary
Small-vendor cloud practice management sold on flat subscription with unlimited users
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kareo Clinical kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product; Onward Vet the vendor is small, so support depth, release pace and the ability to absorb a serious outage are all limited compared with IDEXX, Covetrus or the larger cloud vendors.
- They diverge on capability: Kareo Clinical covers Electronic Health Records, Onward Vet covers Flat practice subscription.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kareo Clinical and Onward Vet actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kareo Clinical | Onward Vet |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $89/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Healthcare | Veterinary |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kareo Clinical
- Electronic Health Records
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Medical Billing
- ePrescribing
- Analytics
- Labs
- Pharmacies
Only in Onward Vet
- Flat practice subscription
- Cloud hosted
- Medical records and SOAP
- Estimates and treatment plans
- Client communication
- Laboratory integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kareo Clinical
- Practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practicesnot Onward Vet
- Electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinicsnot Onward Vet
- Insurance claim submission and patient payment collectionnot Onward Vet
Onward Vet
- A clinic with a large rota of part-time technicians and receptionists where per-seat pricing is disproportionatenot Kareo Clinical
- A single-site practice leaving an ageing on-premise system that no longer wants to maintain a servernot Kareo Clinical
- A new practice that needs a working record system quickly without a long configuration projectnot Kareo Clinical
- A cost-sensitive clinic that wants cloud practice management without paying for integration breadth it will not usenot Kareo Clinical
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kareo Clinical
- Kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- Tebra publishes no rate: pricing varies with provider count, features and implementation requirements and is quoted during a demo
- Billing counts clinical providers such as MDs, DOs, NPs and PAs, so adding a prescriber raises the bill even though non clinical staff are free
- Electronic prescribing of controlled substances setup costs about $75 per provider as a one time fee
- PDMP integration costs $500 one time per facility plus about $50 per user per year
Onward Vet
- The vendor is small, so support depth, release pace and the ability to absorb a serious outage are all limited compared with IDEXX, Covetrus or the larger cloud vendors.
- The integration catalogue is short, so specialist imaging, communication or wellness plan tools that connect to ezyVet or Provet Cloud may need manual handling here.
- Reporting is basic, so a practice that wants production analysis by veterinary surgeon, detailed inventory valuation or multi-site consolidation will be exporting data to a spreadsheet.
- There is no on-premise option, so a clinic with an unreliable internet connection has no fallback when the link goes down and the appointment book becomes unreachable.
- Concentration risk is real with a supplier of this size: acquisition, a change of direction or a funding problem would put your record system into other hands, so test the data export before committing.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kareo Clinical
$89/month- Clinical Starter$89/month
- EHR
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Clinical Plus$189/month
- Everything in Starter
- Billing
- Analytics
Onward Vet
On request- Onward Vet$undefined/year
- Quoted as a flat monthly practice subscription
- Unlimited user accounts
- Cloud hosting, backup and updates included
Which should you pick?
Choose Kareo Clinical if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want scheduling.
Choose Onward Vet if
- You need flat practice subscription.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want cloud hosted.
Questions people ask
- Is Kareo Clinical or Onward Vet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kareo Clinical starts at $89/month and Onward Vet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kareo Clinical or Onward Vet?
- Kareo Clinical starts at $89/month and Onward Vet at On request.
- Does Kareo Clinical or Onward Vet run on more platforms?
- Kareo Clinical runs on Web, Mobile. Onward Vet runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Kareo Clinical best used for?
- Kareo Clinical is most often used for practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices, electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics, insurance claim submission and patient payment collection. Of those, practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices and electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics are not what Onward Vet is typically brought in for.
- What can Kareo Clinical do that Onward Vet cannot?
- Kareo Clinical covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Patient Portal, Medical Billing. Onward Vet covers Flat practice subscription, Cloud hosted, Medical records and SOAP, Estimates and treatment plans.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kareo Clinical: How much does Kareo Clinical (now Tebra) cost?
Kareo Clinical pricing is not published publicly. Pricing is based on the number of clinical providers in your practice, not seat licenses. Setup includes optional EPCS at $75/provider and PDMP Integration at $500 one-time per facility plus $50/user/year.
SourceOnward Vet: How is it priced?
As a flat practice subscription with unlimited users, quoted rather than published, which is why it suits clinics with many part-time staff.
Kareo Clinical: Does Tebra charge for front desk staff and medical assistants?
No. Tebra provides unlimited non-clinical staff access at no extra cost. Front desk staff, medical assistants, billers, and office admins can all access scheduling, charting, and claims modules without increasing billing.
SourceOnward Vet: Is it suitable for a multi-site group?
Not really. It is built for single-site independent clinics; consolidated reporting and cross-site inventory are not its strength.
Kareo Clinical: Are there reduced rates for low-volume practices on Tebra?
Yes. Practices with providers billing under 100 claims monthly receive lower-tier pricing for those low-volume providers.
SourceOnward Vet: What happens if the internet goes down?
You lose access to the appointment book and records. There is no on-premise fallback, so a secondary connection is a sensible precaution.
Onward Vet: Can I get my data out?
Ask for a full export during evaluation and check what format it comes in. With a small vendor this is a question to answer before you sign, not afterwards.
Related pages
More on Kareo Clinical
Other head to heads
- Kareo Clinical vs Athenahealth
- Kareo Clinical vs TheraNest
- Kareo Clinical vs Epic Systems
- Kareo Clinical vs Cerner
- Kareo Clinical vs Amwell
- Kareo Clinical vs Practice Fusion
- Kareo Clinical vs DrChrono
- Kareo Clinical vs NextGen Healthcare
- Kareo Clinical vs WebPT
- Kareo Clinical vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Kareo Clinical vs ChiroTouch
- Kareo Clinical vs eClinicalWorks
- Kareo Clinical vs Rx30
- Kareo Clinical vs Aidoc
- Kareo Clinical vs Annalise.ai
- Kareo Clinical vs Doctor on Demand
- Kareo Clinical vs Doxy.me
- Kareo Clinical vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Kareo Clinical vs Hippo Manager
- Kareo Clinical vs Shepherd
- Kareo Clinical vs Digitail
- Kareo Clinical vs Animana
- Kareo Clinical vs IDEXX Neo
- Kareo Clinical vs VetBadger
- Kareo Clinical vs VIA Veterinary
- Kareo Clinical vs VisionVPM
- Kareo Clinical vs PetDesk
- Kareo Clinical vs Talkatoo
- Kareo Clinical vs Vet Radar
- Kareo Clinical vs RxWorks
- Kareo Clinical vs ImproMed
- Kareo Clinical vs AVImark
- Onward Vet vs Athenahealth
- Onward Vet vs TheraNest
- Onward Vet vs Epic Systems
- Onward Vet vs Cerner
- Onward Vet vs Amwell
- Onward Vet vs Practice Fusion
- Onward Vet vs DrChrono
- Onward Vet vs NextGen Healthcare
- Onward Vet vs WebPT
- Onward Vet vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Onward Vet vs ChiroTouch
- Onward Vet vs eClinicalWorks
- Onward Vet vs Rx30
- Onward Vet vs Aidoc
- Onward Vet vs Annalise.ai
- Onward Vet vs Doctor on Demand
- Onward Vet vs Doxy.me
- Onward Vet vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Onward Vet vs Hippo Manager
- Onward Vet vs Shepherd
- Onward Vet vs Digitail
- Onward Vet vs Animana
- Onward Vet vs IDEXX Neo
- Onward Vet vs VetBadger
- Onward Vet vs VIA Veterinary
- Onward Vet vs VisionVPM
- Onward Vet vs PetDesk
- Onward Vet vs Talkatoo
- Onward Vet vs Vet Radar
- Onward Vet vs RxWorks
- Onward Vet vs ImproMed
- Onward Vet vs AVImark
