Backup · head to head
HYCU vs UrBackup

HYCU
Backup
Backup as a service spanning SaaS applications as well as infrastructure
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

UrBackup
Backup
Open source client server backup doing both file and whole disk image backups of Windows machines
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only UrBackup has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: HYCU pricing is quoted with different billing units for different services, so an estate spanning virtual machines, cloud and SaaS is billed three ways and annual forecasting becomes guesswork.; UrBackup backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- They diverge on capability: HYCU covers R-Cloud platform, UrBackup covers Windows image backups.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HYCU and UrBackup actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HYCU
- R-Cloud platform
- SaaS application backup
- Nutanix and VMware backup
- Cloud infrastructure backup
- R-Graph
- Development kit
- Immutable backup targets
Only in UrBackup
- Windows image backups
- File backups
- Web interface
- Client discovery
- Internet mode
- Filesystem deduplication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HYCU
- An organisation that has just realised its Okta, Jira and GitHub data is not covered by any backup product it ownsnot UrBackup
- A Nutanix environment needing agentless backup that understands the platform rather than treating it as generic virtual machinesnot UrBackup
- A mid-market IT team wanting one vendor across on premises virtual machines, cloud workloads and SaaS applicationsnot UrBackup
- Building an immutable off-site copy with object lock to satisfy a cyber insurance requirementnot UrBackup
UrBackup
- A small office with Windows workstations that needs bare metal restore without per seat licensingnot HYCU
- Schools and labs where machines are re-imaged often and a known good image must be recoverablenot HYCU
- Backing up a mixed fleet to one server on premises with a web interface non specialists can usenot HYCU
- Replacing an expiring commercial endpoint backup licence where the budget is the constraintnot HYCU
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HYCU
- Pricing is quoted with different billing units for different services, so an estate spanning virtual machines, cloud and SaaS is billed three ways and annual forecasting becomes guesswork.
- Backup storage and cloud egress on restore are billed by your cloud provider rather than by HYCU, which means the recovery cost of a large incident appears on a different invoice and is rarely modelled in advance.
- SaaS integration depth varies considerably by application, and a source appearing on the supported list does not guarantee that every object type within it is captured; verify the specific data you need.
- Integrations built with the development kit may come from partners rather than HYCU, so the support path for a given source is worth establishing before you rely on it.
- The product's Nutanix heritage still shows in feature depth, and organisations with predominantly VMware or physical estates often find the incumbent backup vendors more mature for those workloads.
UrBackup
- Backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- Deduplication relies on filesystem features such as hard links, btrfs or ZFS, so a server built on the wrong filesystem silently consumes far more space and the fix is a rebuild rather than a setting.
- There is no native object storage target, so offsite copies mean replicating the server storage with another tool rather than backing up to a bucket directly.
- Restoring a full Windows image requires booting a restore environment, which is a manual, on site procedure that needs to be rehearsed before the day it is needed.
- A single server holds everything and there is no built in clustering, so its own failure removes every recovery point at once unless you have separately solved replication.
Pricing, plan by plan
HYCU
On request- HYCU R-Cloud$undefined/year
- Consumption pricing by virtual machine, tebibyte or gibibyte depending on service
- Different units for different data sources under one agreement
- Cloud storage target costs billed separately by your provider
UrBackup
Free- UrBackupFree
- Full functionality, unlimited clients
- File and image backups
- Web administration interface
Which should you pick?
Choose HYCU if
- You need r-cloud platform.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want saas application backup.
Choose UrBackup if
- You need windows image backups.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want file backups.
Questions people ask
- Is HYCU or UrBackup better?
- Neither clearly leads. HYCU starts at On request and UrBackup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HYCU or UrBackup?
- UrBackup has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for HYCU and Free for UrBackup.
- Does HYCU or UrBackup run on more platforms?
- HYCU runs on Web, Linux, Windows. UrBackup runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- Can I use UrBackup for free?
- Yes. UrBackup has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. HYCU starts at On request.
- What is HYCU best used for?
- HYCU is most often used for an organisation that has just realised its okta, jira and github data is not covered by any backup product it owns, a nutanix environment needing agentless backup that understands the platform rather than treating it as generic virtual machines, a mid-market it team wanting one vendor across on premises virtual machines, cloud workloads and saas applications, building an immutable off-site copy with object lock to satisfy a cyber insurance requirement. Of those, an organisation that has just realised its okta, jira and github data is not covered by any backup product it owns and a nutanix environment needing agentless backup that understands the platform rather than treating it as generic virtual machines are not what UrBackup is typically brought in for.
- What can HYCU do that UrBackup cannot?
- HYCU covers R-Cloud platform, SaaS application backup, Nutanix and VMware backup, Cloud infrastructure backup. UrBackup covers Windows image backups, File backups, Web interface, Client discovery.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HYCU: Is pricing published?
No. It is consumption based by virtual machine, tebibyte or gibibyte depending on the service, and quoted. Ask specifically which unit applies to each data source in your estate.
UrBackup: Does it back up Linux servers as well?
File backups yes, image backups no. The image path is Windows only through volume shadow copy.
HYCU: Does it really back up SaaS applications?
Yes, that is the main differentiator, with a long supported source list. Confirm the depth of coverage for the specific objects you need in each application.
UrBackup: Is the data encrypted?
Transport can be encrypted, and there is optional client side file encryption, but the default server storage is not encrypted at rest. Use full disk encryption on the server.
HYCU: Who holds the encryption keys?
Ask directly and get it in writing. Key custody differs by deployment model and it determines whether you can render backup copies unreadable independently of the vendor.
UrBackup: Can I back up to Amazon S3?
Not directly. The server writes to local or mounted storage, so cloud copies are made by replicating that storage separately.
UrBackup: How many clients can one server handle?
Dozens is routine on decent hardware. The limit is usually storage input and output during overlapping backup windows rather than client count.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- HYCU vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- HYCU vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- HYCU vs Portworx Backup
- HYCU vs Velero
- HYCU vs BDRShield
- HYCU vs Trilio
- HYCU vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- HYCU vs CloudCasa
- HYCU vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- HYCU vs Spanning Backup
- HYCU vs Keepit
- HYCU vs Rewind
- HYCU vs Cohesity
- HYCU vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- HYCU vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- HYCU vs IBM Storage Protect
- HYCU vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- HYCU vs Macrium Reflect
- HYCU vs Bacula
- HYCU vs Kopia
- HYCU vs Proxmox Backup Server
- HYCU vs Clonezilla
- HYCU vs Amanda Enterprise
- HYCU vs rustic
- HYCU vs Borg Backup
- HYCU vs Restic
- HYCU vs Clumio
- HYCU vs Bacula Enterprise
- UrBackup vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- UrBackup vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- UrBackup vs Portworx Backup
- UrBackup vs Velero
- UrBackup vs BDRShield
- UrBackup vs Trilio
- UrBackup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- UrBackup vs CloudCasa
- UrBackup vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- UrBackup vs Spanning Backup
- UrBackup vs Keepit
- UrBackup vs Rewind
- UrBackup vs Cohesity
- UrBackup vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- UrBackup vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- UrBackup vs IBM Storage Protect
- UrBackup vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- UrBackup vs Macrium Reflect
- UrBackup vs Bacula
- UrBackup vs Kopia
- UrBackup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- UrBackup vs Clonezilla
- UrBackup vs Amanda Enterprise
- UrBackup vs rustic
- UrBackup vs Borg Backup
- UrBackup vs Restic
- UrBackup vs Clumio
- UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise
