Backup · head to head
Restic vs UrBackup

UrBackup
Backup
Open source client server backup doing both file and whole disk image backups of Windows machines
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Restic cold storage is not natively supported; restoring from S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive is only available as an experimental feature behind a feature flag; UrBackup backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- They diverge on capability: Restic covers Content-defined chunking, UrBackup covers Windows image backups.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Restic and UrBackup actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Restic
- Content-defined chunking
- Cryptographic verification
- Deduplication
- Encryption
- Multiple backends
- Snapshot management
- AWS S3
- Azure
Only in UrBackup
- Windows image backups
- File backups
- Web interface
- Client discovery
- Internet mode
- Filesystem deduplication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Restic
- Encrypted deduplicated backups to S3, B2, SFTP and local disk from the command linenot UrBackup
- Scripted server backups with snapshot retention policiesnot UrBackup
UrBackup
- A small office with Windows workstations that needs bare metal restore without per seat licensingnot Restic
- Schools and labs where machines are re-imaged often and a known good image must be recoverablenot Restic
- Backing up a mixed fleet to one server on premises with a web interface non specialists can usenot Restic
- Replacing an expiring commercial endpoint backup licence where the budget is the constraintnot Restic
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Restic
- Cold storage is not natively supported; restoring from S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive is only available as an experimental feature behind a feature flag
- A Windows file whose name contains a character Windows treats as invalid cannot be read by restic and has to be renamed
- Antivirus real-time protection degrades performance on Windows unless the restic binary is added to an exclusions list
- On large repositories the built-in five minute stuck-request timeout fires during file listing and has to be raised manually with --stuck-request-timeout
UrBackup
- Backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- Deduplication relies on filesystem features such as hard links, btrfs or ZFS, so a server built on the wrong filesystem silently consumes far more space and the fix is a rebuild rather than a setting.
- There is no native object storage target, so offsite copies mean replicating the server storage with another tool rather than backing up to a bucket directly.
- Restoring a full Windows image requires booting a restore environment, which is a manual, on site procedure that needs to be rehearsed before the day it is needed.
- A single server holds everything and there is no built in clustering, so its own failure removes every recovery point at once unless you have separately solved replication.
Pricing, plan by plan
Restic
Free- FreeFree
- Content-defined chunking
- Encryption
- Multiple backends
UrBackup
Free- UrBackupFree
- Full functionality, unlimited clients
- File and image backups
- Web administration interface
Which should you pick?
Choose Restic if
- You need content-defined chunking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Mac, Linux.
- You also want cryptographic verification.
Choose UrBackup if
- You need windows image backups.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want file backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Restic or UrBackup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Restic starts at Free and UrBackup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Restic or UrBackup?
- Restic starts at Free and UrBackup at Free.
- Does Restic or UrBackup run on more platforms?
- Restic runs on Windows, Mac, Linux. UrBackup runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Restic for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Restic best used for?
- Restic is most often used for encrypted deduplicated backups to s3, b2, sftp and local disk from the command line, scripted server backups with snapshot retention policies. Of those, encrypted deduplicated backups to s3, b2, sftp and local disk from the command line and scripted server backups with snapshot retention policies are not what UrBackup is typically brought in for.
- What can Restic do that UrBackup cannot?
- Restic covers Content-defined chunking, Cryptographic verification, Deduplication, Encryption. UrBackup covers Windows image backups, File backups, Web interface, Client discovery.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Restic: How much does restic cost?
Restic is entirely free to use and completely open source. There are no subscription tiers, paid plans, or licensing costs.
SourceUrBackup: Does it back up Linux servers as well?
File backups yes, image backups no. The image path is Windows only through volume shadow copy.
UrBackup: Is the data encrypted?
Transport can be encrypted, and there is optional client side file encryption, but the default server storage is not encrypted at rest. Use full disk encryption on the server.
UrBackup: Can I back up to Amazon S3?
Not directly. The server writes to local or mounted storage, so cloud copies are made by replicating that storage separately.
UrBackup: How many clients can one server handle?
Dozens is routine on decent hardware. The limit is usually storage input and output during overlapping backup windows rather than client count.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Restic vs Velero
- Restic vs Kopia
- Restic vs rustic
- Restic vs Backupify
- Restic vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Restic vs Spanning Backup
- Restic vs CloudAlly
- Restic vs Borg Backup
- Restic vs Clonezilla
- Restic vs Comet Backup
- Restic vs Amanda Enterprise
- Restic vs Apple Time Machine
- Restic vs BDRShield
- Restic vs Clumio
- Restic vs Cohesity
- Restic vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Restic vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Restic vs Bacula
- Restic vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Restic vs Bacula Enterprise
- UrBackup vs Velero
- UrBackup vs Kopia
- UrBackup vs rustic
- UrBackup vs Backupify
- UrBackup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- UrBackup vs Spanning Backup
- UrBackup vs CloudAlly
- UrBackup vs Borg Backup
- UrBackup vs Clonezilla
- UrBackup vs Comet Backup
- UrBackup vs Amanda Enterprise
- UrBackup vs Apple Time Machine
- UrBackup vs BDRShield
- UrBackup vs Clumio
- UrBackup vs Cohesity
- UrBackup vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- UrBackup vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- UrBackup vs Bacula
- UrBackup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

