Backup · head to head
Clumio vs HYCU

Clumio
Backup
Serverless AWS backup with published per-gigabyte rates and explicit restore charges
- From
- $0.01/month
- Rated
- -

HYCU
Backup
Backup as a service spanning SaaS applications as well as infrastructure
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clumio restore is charged at $0.040 per GiB plus data transfer out, so recovering a hundred terabytes in an incident costs thousands of dollars on top of the storage fee, a bill nobody budgets for.; HYCU pricing is quoted with different billing units for different services, so an estate spanning virtual machines, cloud and SaaS is billed three ways and annual forecasting becomes guesswork.
- They diverge on capability: Clumio covers Air-gapped backups, HYCU covers R-Cloud platform.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clumio and HYCU actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clumio
- Air-gapped backups
- Fifteen-minute recovery points
- S3 SecureVault
- Backtrack
- Terraform provider
- Compliance attestations
Only in HYCU
- R-Cloud platform
- SaaS application backup
- Nutanix and VMware backup
- Cloud infrastructure backup
- R-Graph
- Development kit
- Immutable backup targets
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clumio
- An AWS-native company needing backups outside its own account so a compromised root credential cannot delete themnot HYCU
- A team that has to model recovery cost before an incident rather than discover it during onenot HYCU
- An organisation protecting billions of S3 objects where per-object charges dominate per-gigabyte chargesnot HYCU
- A regulated business needing SOC 2, HIPAA and PCI-DSS attested backup without running backup serversnot HYCU
HYCU
- An organisation that has just realised its Okta, Jira and GitHub data is not covered by any backup product it ownsnot Clumio
- A Nutanix environment needing agentless backup that understands the platform rather than treating it as generic virtual machinesnot Clumio
- A mid-market IT team wanting one vendor across on premises virtual machines, cloud workloads and SaaS applicationsnot Clumio
- Building an immutable off-site copy with object lock to satisfy a cyber insurance requirementnot Clumio
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clumio
- Restore is charged at $0.040 per GiB plus data transfer out, so recovering a hundred terabytes in an incident costs thousands of dollars on top of the storage fee, a bill nobody budgets for.
- Per-object charges of $1.50 per million managed objects per month mean estates with billions of small objects pay far more than a per-gigabyte estimate suggests.
- The archive tier is cheaper to store but restores begin only after 24 to 48 hours, which is incompatible with most recovery time objectives, and early deletion inside six months incurs a fee.
- It is an AWS product; Azure workloads are on the roadmap rather than shipping, so multi-cloud organisations still need a second backup platform.
- The Commvault acquisition means Clumio now overlaps with Commvault own cloud protection, and buyers should ask directly how the two portfolios converge before signing multi-year terms.
HYCU
- Pricing is quoted with different billing units for different services, so an estate spanning virtual machines, cloud and SaaS is billed three ways and annual forecasting becomes guesswork.
- Backup storage and cloud egress on restore are billed by your cloud provider rather than by HYCU, which means the recovery cost of a large incident appears on a different invoice and is rarely modelled in advance.
- SaaS integration depth varies considerably by application, and a source appearing on the supported list does not guarantee that every object type within it is captured; verify the specific data you need.
- Integrations built with the development kit may come from partners rather than HYCU, so the support path for a given source is worth establishing before you rely on it.
- The product's Nutanix heritage still shows in feature depth, and organisations with predominantly VMware or physical estates often find the incumbent backup vendors more mature for those workloads.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clumio
$0.01/month- S3 SecureVault Standard$0.025/month
- $0.025 per GiB-month plus $1.50 per million managed objects per month
- Restores $0.040 per GiB instant access and $0.09 per GiB retrieved
- $0.025 per 1,000 API requests, data transfer out charged separately
- S3 SecureVault Archive$0.01/month
- $0.010 per GiB-month plus $1.50 per million managed objects per month
- Restores begin after 24 to 48 hours
- $0.040 per GiB restored plus data transfer out
- Backtrack$undefined/month
- $1.50 per million managed objects-month, included free with SecureVault
- $0.50 per million objects processed on restore
- Metadata change tracking rather than full backup
HYCU
On request- HYCU R-Cloud$undefined/year
- Consumption pricing by virtual machine, tebibyte or gibibyte depending on service
- Different units for different data sources under one agreement
- Cloud storage target costs billed separately by your provider
Which should you pick?
Choose Clumio if
- You need air-gapped backups.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want fifteen-minute recovery points.
Choose HYCU if
- You need r-cloud platform.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want saas application backup.
Questions people ask
- Is Clumio or HYCU better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clumio starts at $0.01/month and HYCU at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clumio or HYCU?
- Clumio starts at $0.01/month and HYCU at On request.
- Does Clumio or HYCU run on more platforms?
- Clumio runs on Web, API. HYCU runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is Clumio best used for?
- Clumio is most often used for an aws-native company needing backups outside its own account so a compromised root credential cannot delete them, a team that has to model recovery cost before an incident rather than discover it during one, an organisation protecting billions of s3 objects where per-object charges dominate per-gigabyte charges, a regulated business needing soc 2, hipaa and pci-dss attested backup without running backup servers. Of those, an aws-native company needing backups outside its own account so a compromised root credential cannot delete them and a team that has to model recovery cost before an incident rather than discover it during one are not what HYCU is typically brought in for.
- What can Clumio do that HYCU cannot?
- Clumio covers Air-gapped backups, Fifteen-minute recovery points, S3 SecureVault, Backtrack. HYCU covers R-Cloud platform, SaaS application backup, Nutanix and VMware backup, Cloud infrastructure backup.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clumio: What does a restore cost?
$0.040 per GiB for instant access, $0.09 per GiB retrieved from archive, $0.025 per 1,000 API requests, plus AWS data transfer out. Model this before an incident.
HYCU: Is pricing published?
No. It is consumption based by virtual machine, tebibyte or gibibyte depending on the service, and quoted. Ask specifically which unit applies to each data source in your estate.
Clumio: Does it support Azure?
Not yet. Azure workloads are listed as on the roadmap. Today it is AWS, with some Google Cloud Storage coverage.
HYCU: Does it really back up SaaS applications?
Yes, that is the main differentiator, with a long supported source list. Confirm the depth of coverage for the specific objects you need in each application.
Clumio: Is it still Clumio after the Commvault acquisition?
Yes, sold as Clumio by Commvault with its own pricing page and product line, but ask about portfolio convergence on a multi-year deal.
HYCU: Who holds the encryption keys?
Ask directly and get it in writing. Key custody differs by deployment model and it determines whether you can render backup copies unreadable independently of the vendor.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clumio vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Clumio vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Clumio vs Redstor
- Clumio vs Duplicacy
- Clumio vs Amanda Enterprise
- Clumio vs Backupify
- Clumio vs Spanning Backup
- Clumio vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Clumio vs Rewind
- Clumio vs CloudCasa
- Clumio vs AOMEI Backupper
- Clumio vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Clumio vs Datto Backup
- Clumio vs HPE StoreOnce
- Clumio vs Kopia
- Clumio vs MSP360 Backup
- Clumio vs N-able Backup
- Clumio vs Portworx Backup
- Clumio vs Velero
- Clumio vs BDRShield
- Clumio vs Trilio
- Clumio vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Clumio vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Clumio vs Keepit
- Clumio vs Cohesity
- Clumio vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Clumio vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Clumio vs IBM Storage Protect
- Clumio vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Clumio vs Macrium Reflect
- HYCU vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- HYCU vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- HYCU vs Redstor
- HYCU vs Duplicacy
- HYCU vs Amanda Enterprise
- HYCU vs Backupify
- HYCU vs Spanning Backup
- HYCU vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- HYCU vs Rewind
- HYCU vs CloudCasa
- HYCU vs AOMEI Backupper
- HYCU vs Cohesity DataProtect
- HYCU vs Datto Backup
- HYCU vs HPE StoreOnce
- HYCU vs Kopia
- HYCU vs MSP360 Backup
- HYCU vs N-able Backup
- HYCU vs Portworx Backup
- HYCU vs Velero
- HYCU vs BDRShield
- HYCU vs Trilio
- HYCU vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- HYCU vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- HYCU vs Keepit
- HYCU vs Cohesity
- HYCU vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- HYCU vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- HYCU vs IBM Storage Protect
- HYCU vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- HYCU vs Macrium Reflect
