Backup · head to head
Proxmox Backup Server vs UrBackup

Proxmox Backup Server
Backup
Deduplicating backup server for virtual machines, containers and Linux hosts, with verification built in
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

UrBackup
Backup
Open source client server backup doing both file and whole disk image backups of Windows machines
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Proxmox Backup Server there is no Windows client, so physical Windows machines must be backed up by something else and the estate ends up with two backup products.; UrBackup backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- They diverge on capability: Proxmox Backup Server covers Deduplicated chunk store, UrBackup covers Windows image backups.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Proxmox Backup Server and UrBackup actually diverge.
| Attribute | Proxmox Backup Server | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Linux | Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Proxmox Backup Server
- Deduplicated chunk store
- Incremental guest backups
- Client side encryption
- Verification jobs
- Remote sync
- Live restore and file level restore
Only in UrBackup
- Windows image backups
- File backups
- Web interface
- Client discovery
- Internet mode
- Filesystem deduplication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Proxmox Backup Server
- Backing up a Proxmox VE cluster with incremental block level backups of running guestsnot UrBackup
- Replacing a backup product whose licence is priced per socket or per terabyte on a virtualisation estatenot UrBackup
- Proving backup integrity on a schedule rather than discovering corruption during a restorenot UrBackup
- Keeping an encrypted second copy on a remote server or on tape without a third party servicenot UrBackup
UrBackup
- A small office with Windows workstations that needs bare metal restore without per seat licensingnot Proxmox Backup Server
- Schools and labs where machines are re-imaged often and a known good image must be recoverablenot Proxmox Backup Server
- Backing up a mixed fleet to one server on premises with a web interface non specialists can usenot Proxmox Backup Server
- Replacing an expiring commercial endpoint backup licence where the budget is the constraintnot Proxmox Backup Server
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Proxmox Backup Server
- There is no Windows client, so physical Windows machines must be backed up by something else and the estate ends up with two backup products.
- The datastore is millions of small chunk files, so it needs storage with real input and output capability and performs poorly on a single spinning disk or an SMB or NFS share.
- Deduplication is per datastore, so splitting workloads across datastores for retention or tenancy reasons multiplies the storage those workloads consume.
- Garbage collection depends on file access time semantics on the underlying filesystem, so a datastore mounted with the wrong options can fail to reclaim space or, worse, behave unpredictably.
- Subscriptions are priced per CPU socket per year, so a backup server consolidated onto fewer larger dual socket machines pays twice per host for the supported repository.
UrBackup
- Backups are stored on the server without encryption at rest by default, so the backup server holds a readable copy of every machine it protects and becomes the highest value target on the network.
- Deduplication relies on filesystem features such as hard links, btrfs or ZFS, so a server built on the wrong filesystem silently consumes far more space and the fix is a rebuild rather than a setting.
- There is no native object storage target, so offsite copies mean replicating the server storage with another tool rather than backing up to a bucket directly.
- Restoring a full Windows image requires booting a restore environment, which is a manual, on site procedure that needs to be rehearsed before the day it is needed.
- A single server holds everything and there is no built in clustering, so its own failure removes every recovery point at once unless you have separately solved replication.
Pricing, plan by plan
Proxmox Backup Server
Free- No subscriptionFree
- Full functionality with no capacity limit
- Community package repository
- Community forum support
- Subscription$undefined/year
- Priced per CPU socket per year
- Access to the enterprise package repository
- Vendor support tickets
UrBackup
Free- UrBackupFree
- Full functionality, unlimited clients
- File and image backups
- Web administration interface
Which should you pick?
Choose Proxmox Backup Server if
- You need deduplicated chunk store.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want incremental guest backups.
Choose UrBackup if
- You need windows image backups.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want file backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Proxmox Backup Server or UrBackup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Proxmox Backup Server starts at Free and UrBackup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Proxmox Backup Server or UrBackup?
- Proxmox Backup Server starts at Free and UrBackup at Free.
- Does Proxmox Backup Server or UrBackup run on more platforms?
- Proxmox Backup Server runs on Linux. UrBackup runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Proxmox Backup Server for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Proxmox Backup Server best used for?
- Proxmox Backup Server is most often used for backing up a proxmox ve cluster with incremental block level backups of running guests, replacing a backup product whose licence is priced per socket or per terabyte on a virtualisation estate, proving backup integrity on a schedule rather than discovering corruption during a restore, keeping an encrypted second copy on a remote server or on tape without a third party service. Of those, backing up a proxmox ve cluster with incremental block level backups of running guests and replacing a backup product whose licence is priced per socket or per terabyte on a virtualisation estate are not what UrBackup is typically brought in for.
- What can Proxmox Backup Server do that UrBackup cannot?
- Proxmox Backup Server covers Deduplicated chunk store, Incremental guest backups, Client side encryption, Verification jobs. UrBackup covers Windows image backups, File backups, Web interface, Client discovery.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proxmox Backup Server: Can it back up machines that are not on Proxmox?
Linux hosts yes, through the client, at file level. Other hypervisors and physical Windows machines are outside its scope.
UrBackup: Does it back up Linux servers as well?
File backups yes, image backups no. The image path is Windows only through volume shadow copy.
Proxmox Backup Server: Is a subscription required?
No. Without one you use the community repository and forum support. The subscription buys the tested enterprise repository and vendor tickets.
UrBackup: Is the data encrypted?
Transport can be encrypted, and there is optional client side file encryption, but the default server storage is not encrypted at rest. Use full disk encryption on the server.
Proxmox Backup Server: How do I know a backup will restore?
Run verification jobs. They re-read the stored chunks and mark snapshots verified or failed, which is stronger evidence than a successful backup log.
UrBackup: Can I back up to Amazon S3?
Not directly. The server writes to local or mounted storage, so cloud copies are made by replicating that storage separately.
Proxmox Backup Server: What storage should the datastore be on?
Local disks, ideally with ZFS and enough input and output capacity for many small files. Network shares are supported but routinely disappointing.
UrBackup: How many clients can one server handle?
Dozens is routine on decent hardware. The limit is usually storage input and output during overlapping backup windows rather than client count.
Related pages
More on Proxmox Backup Server
Other head to heads
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Bacula
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Kopia
- Proxmox Backup Server vs rustic
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Borg Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Duplicacy
- Proxmox Backup Server vs BDRShield
- Proxmox Backup Server vs HPE StoreOnce
- Proxmox Backup Server vs HYCU
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Portworx Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Velero
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Apple Time Machine
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Arcserve UDP
- Proxmox Backup Server vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Axcient x360Recover
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Bacula Enterprise
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Clonezilla
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Amanda Enterprise
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Restic
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Clumio
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Cohesity
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- UrBackup vs Bacula
- UrBackup vs Kopia
- UrBackup vs rustic
- UrBackup vs Borg Backup
- UrBackup vs Duplicacy
- UrBackup vs BDRShield
- UrBackup vs HPE StoreOnce
- UrBackup vs HYCU
- UrBackup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- UrBackup vs Portworx Backup
- UrBackup vs Velero
- UrBackup vs Apple Time Machine
- UrBackup vs Arcserve UDP
- UrBackup vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- UrBackup vs Axcient x360Recover
- UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise
- UrBackup vs Clonezilla
- UrBackup vs Amanda Enterprise
- UrBackup vs Restic
- UrBackup vs Clumio
- UrBackup vs Cohesity
- UrBackup vs Dell EMC NetWorker
