Backup · head to head
HYCU vs Proxmox Backup Server

HYCU
Backup
Backup as a service spanning SaaS applications as well as infrastructure
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Proxmox Backup Server
Backup
Deduplicating backup server for virtual machines, containers and Linux hosts, with verification built in
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Proxmox Backup Server has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: HYCU pricing is quoted with different billing units for different services, so an estate spanning virtual machines, cloud and SaaS is billed three ways and annual forecasting becomes guesswork.; Proxmox Backup Server there is no Windows client, so physical Windows machines must be backed up by something else and the estate ends up with two backup products.
- They diverge on capability: HYCU covers R-Cloud platform, Proxmox Backup Server covers Deduplicated chunk store.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HYCU and Proxmox Backup Server actually diverge.
| Attribute | HYCU | Proxmox Backup Server |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | Linux |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HYCU
- R-Cloud platform
- SaaS application backup
- Nutanix and VMware backup
- Cloud infrastructure backup
- R-Graph
- Development kit
- Immutable backup targets
Only in Proxmox Backup Server
- Deduplicated chunk store
- Incremental guest backups
- Client side encryption
- Verification jobs
- Remote sync
- Live restore and file level restore
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HYCU
- An organisation that has just realised its Okta, Jira and GitHub data is not covered by any backup product it ownsnot Proxmox Backup Server
- A Nutanix environment needing agentless backup that understands the platform rather than treating it as generic virtual machinesnot Proxmox Backup Server
- A mid-market IT team wanting one vendor across on premises virtual machines, cloud workloads and SaaS applicationsnot Proxmox Backup Server
- Building an immutable off-site copy with object lock to satisfy a cyber insurance requirementnot Proxmox Backup Server
Proxmox Backup Server
- Backing up a Proxmox VE cluster with incremental block level backups of running guestsnot HYCU
- Replacing a backup product whose licence is priced per socket or per terabyte on a virtualisation estatenot HYCU
- Proving backup integrity on a schedule rather than discovering corruption during a restorenot HYCU
- Keeping an encrypted second copy on a remote server or on tape without a third party servicenot HYCU
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HYCU
- Pricing is quoted with different billing units for different services, so an estate spanning virtual machines, cloud and SaaS is billed three ways and annual forecasting becomes guesswork.
- Backup storage and cloud egress on restore are billed by your cloud provider rather than by HYCU, which means the recovery cost of a large incident appears on a different invoice and is rarely modelled in advance.
- SaaS integration depth varies considerably by application, and a source appearing on the supported list does not guarantee that every object type within it is captured; verify the specific data you need.
- Integrations built with the development kit may come from partners rather than HYCU, so the support path for a given source is worth establishing before you rely on it.
- The product's Nutanix heritage still shows in feature depth, and organisations with predominantly VMware or physical estates often find the incumbent backup vendors more mature for those workloads.
Proxmox Backup Server
- There is no Windows client, so physical Windows machines must be backed up by something else and the estate ends up with two backup products.
- The datastore is millions of small chunk files, so it needs storage with real input and output capability and performs poorly on a single spinning disk or an SMB or NFS share.
- Deduplication is per datastore, so splitting workloads across datastores for retention or tenancy reasons multiplies the storage those workloads consume.
- Garbage collection depends on file access time semantics on the underlying filesystem, so a datastore mounted with the wrong options can fail to reclaim space or, worse, behave unpredictably.
- Subscriptions are priced per CPU socket per year, so a backup server consolidated onto fewer larger dual socket machines pays twice per host for the supported repository.
Pricing, plan by plan
HYCU
On request- HYCU R-Cloud$undefined/year
- Consumption pricing by virtual machine, tebibyte or gibibyte depending on service
- Different units for different data sources under one agreement
- Cloud storage target costs billed separately by your provider
Proxmox Backup Server
Free- No subscriptionFree
- Full functionality with no capacity limit
- Community package repository
- Community forum support
- Subscription$undefined/year
- Priced per CPU socket per year
- Access to the enterprise package repository
- Vendor support tickets
Which should you pick?
Choose HYCU if
- You need r-cloud platform.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want saas application backup.
Choose Proxmox Backup Server if
- You need deduplicated chunk store.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want incremental guest backups.
Questions people ask
- Is HYCU or Proxmox Backup Server better?
- Neither clearly leads. HYCU starts at On request and Proxmox Backup Server at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HYCU or Proxmox Backup Server?
- Proxmox Backup Server has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for HYCU and Free for Proxmox Backup Server.
- Does HYCU or Proxmox Backup Server run on more platforms?
- HYCU runs on Web, Linux, Windows. Proxmox Backup Server runs on Linux.
- Can I use Proxmox Backup Server for free?
- Yes. Proxmox Backup Server has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. HYCU starts at On request.
- What is HYCU best used for?
- HYCU is most often used for an organisation that has just realised its okta, jira and github data is not covered by any backup product it owns, a nutanix environment needing agentless backup that understands the platform rather than treating it as generic virtual machines, a mid-market it team wanting one vendor across on premises virtual machines, cloud workloads and saas applications, building an immutable off-site copy with object lock to satisfy a cyber insurance requirement. Of those, an organisation that has just realised its okta, jira and github data is not covered by any backup product it owns and a nutanix environment needing agentless backup that understands the platform rather than treating it as generic virtual machines are not what Proxmox Backup Server is typically brought in for.
- What can HYCU do that Proxmox Backup Server cannot?
- HYCU covers R-Cloud platform, SaaS application backup, Nutanix and VMware backup, Cloud infrastructure backup. Proxmox Backup Server covers Deduplicated chunk store, Incremental guest backups, Client side encryption, Verification jobs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HYCU: Is pricing published?
No. It is consumption based by virtual machine, tebibyte or gibibyte depending on the service, and quoted. Ask specifically which unit applies to each data source in your estate.
Proxmox Backup Server: Can it back up machines that are not on Proxmox?
Linux hosts yes, through the client, at file level. Other hypervisors and physical Windows machines are outside its scope.
HYCU: Does it really back up SaaS applications?
Yes, that is the main differentiator, with a long supported source list. Confirm the depth of coverage for the specific objects you need in each application.
Proxmox Backup Server: Is a subscription required?
No. Without one you use the community repository and forum support. The subscription buys the tested enterprise repository and vendor tickets.
HYCU: Who holds the encryption keys?
Ask directly and get it in writing. Key custody differs by deployment model and it determines whether you can render backup copies unreadable independently of the vendor.
Proxmox Backup Server: How do I know a backup will restore?
Run verification jobs. They re-read the stored chunks and mark snapshots verified or failed, which is stronger evidence than a successful backup log.
Proxmox Backup Server: What storage should the datastore be on?
Local disks, ideally with ZFS and enough input and output capacity for many small files. Network shares are supported but routinely disappointing.
Related pages
More on Proxmox Backup Server
Other head to heads
- HYCU vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- HYCU vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- HYCU vs Portworx Backup
- HYCU vs Velero
- HYCU vs BDRShield
- HYCU vs Trilio
- HYCU vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- HYCU vs CloudCasa
- HYCU vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- HYCU vs Spanning Backup
- HYCU vs Keepit
- HYCU vs Rewind
- HYCU vs Cohesity
- HYCU vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- HYCU vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- HYCU vs IBM Storage Protect
- HYCU vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- HYCU vs Macrium Reflect
- HYCU vs Bacula
- HYCU vs Kopia
- HYCU vs rustic
- HYCU vs UrBackup
- HYCU vs Borg Backup
- HYCU vs Duplicacy
- HYCU vs HPE StoreOnce
- HYCU vs Apple Time Machine
- HYCU vs Arcserve UDP
- HYCU vs Axcient x360Recover
- HYCU vs Bacula Enterprise
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Portworx Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Velero
- Proxmox Backup Server vs BDRShield
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Trilio
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Proxmox Backup Server vs CloudCasa
- Proxmox Backup Server vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Spanning Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Keepit
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Rewind
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Cohesity
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Proxmox Backup Server vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs IBM Storage Protect
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Macrium Reflect
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Bacula
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Kopia
- Proxmox Backup Server vs rustic
- Proxmox Backup Server vs UrBackup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Borg Backup
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Duplicacy
- Proxmox Backup Server vs HPE StoreOnce
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Apple Time Machine
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Arcserve UDP
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Axcient x360Recover
- Proxmox Backup Server vs Bacula Enterprise
