Maps · head to head
Google Maps vs GraphHopper

Google Maps
Maps
Consumer navigation and local search app, distinct from the paid Google Maps Platform developer API
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Google Maps has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Google Maps location history (Timeline) is stored to the Google account unless disabled, and many users are unaware of how much of their movement is retained by default.; GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only
- They diverge on capability: Google Maps covers Turn-by-turn navigation, GraphHopper covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Google Maps and GraphHopper actually diverge.
| Attribute | Google Maps | GraphHopper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Free consumer app, funded by Google's advertising business | freemium |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Google Maps
- Turn-by-turn navigation
- Local search
- Offline maps
- Street View
- Timeline location history
- Live transit and incident reporting
Only in GraphHopper
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Google Maps
- Getting turn-by-turn driving or transit directions to a destinationnot GraphHopper
- Searching for and comparing nearby restaurants, shops or services with reviewsnot GraphHopper
- Downloading an offline map before travelling somewhere with unreliable data coveragenot GraphHopper
- Checking real time traffic conditions before or during a drivenot GraphHopper
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Google Maps
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Google Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Google Maps
- Location history (Timeline) is stored to the Google account unless disabled, and many users are unaware of how much of their movement is retained by default.
- Local business rankings and prominent ads mix paid placement with organic results, so top results are not purely a relevance ranking.
- Offline maps expire after a period and must be manually refreshed, which can catch travellers out if they rely on an old download without checking it.
- Public transit data quality varies significantly by city and country, and is considerably weaker or absent in many smaller or lower-income regions.
- It is a different product from Google Maps Platform, the paid developer API, and businesses evaluating navigation for their own app need to compare that API's pricing separately rather than assuming free consumer access extends to embedding.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Pricing, plan by plan
Google Maps
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited navigation and local search
- Offline maps included
- No subscription tier for the consumer app
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Google Maps if
- You need turn-by-turn navigation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want local search.
Questions people ask
- Is Google Maps or GraphHopper better?
- Neither clearly leads. Google Maps starts at Free and GraphHopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Google Maps or GraphHopper?
- Google Maps has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Google Maps and On request for GraphHopper.
- Does Google Maps or GraphHopper run on more platforms?
- Google Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. GraphHopper runs on Web.
- Can I use Google Maps for free?
- Yes. Google Maps has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is Google Maps best used for?
- Google Maps is most often used for getting turn-by-turn driving or transit directions to a destination, searching for and comparing nearby restaurants, shops or services with reviews, downloading an offline map before travelling somewhere with unreliable data coverage, checking real time traffic conditions before or during a drive. Of those, getting turn-by-turn driving or transit directions to a destination and searching for and comparing nearby restaurants, shops or services with reviews are not what GraphHopper is typically brought in for.
- What can Google Maps do that GraphHopper cannot?
- Google Maps covers Turn-by-turn navigation, Local search, Offline maps, Street View. GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Google Maps: Is Google Maps free?
Yes, the consumer app is free with no subscription for navigation, local search or offline maps.
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceGoogle Maps: Is this the same as Google Maps Platform?
No, Google Maps Platform is a separate, metered API product sold to developers embedding map functionality into their own apps and websites, with its own usage-based pricing.
GraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceGoogle Maps: Does Google Maps track my location history?
It can, through the optional Timeline feature, which is on by default in some configurations and can be reviewed or disabled in Google account settings.
GraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceGraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on Google Maps
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- Google Maps vs Ride with GPS
- Google Maps vs onX Maps
- Google Maps vs Citymapper
- Google Maps vs Transit
- Google Maps vs Trailforks
- Google Maps vs AllTrails
- Google Maps vs Mapbox
- Google Maps vs GRASS GIS
- Google Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- Google Maps vs Felt
- Google Maps vs Geoapify
- Google Maps vs Nominatim
- Google Maps vs Mapzen
- Google Maps vs Navmii GPS
- Google Maps vs OpenLayers
- Google Maps vs OpenRouteService
- Google Maps vs OpenStreetMap
- Google Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- Google Maps vs Apple Maps
- Google Maps vs HERE Technologies
- Google Maps vs OSRM
- Google Maps vs LocationIQ
- Google Maps vs Stadia Maps
- Google Maps vs Bing Maps
- Google Maps vs MapTiler
- Google Maps vs Potree
- Google Maps vs SW Maps
- Google Maps vs WhiteboxTools
- Google Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs Transit
- GraphHopper vs Trailforks
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs Geographic Calculator
- GraphHopper vs Felt
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs Nominatim
- GraphHopper vs Mapzen
- GraphHopper vs Navmii GPS
- GraphHopper vs OpenLayers
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs OpenStreetMap
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
