Healthcare · head to head
Fujifilm Synapse vs Tebra

Fujifilm Synapse
Healthcare
Enterprise imaging platform covering PACS, VNA, cardiology and 3D from Fujifilm Healthcare
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tebra
Healthcare
Practice management combining EHR, billing and patient engagement for independent practices
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fujifilm Synapse pACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.; Tebra no pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fujifilm Synapse and Tebra actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fujifilm Synapse | Tebra |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fujifilm Synapse
- Synapse PACS
- Synapse VNA
- Synapse Cardiovascular
- Synapse 3D
- Synapse Mobility
- Deconstructed PACS support
- Cloud services
Only in Tebra
Nothing recorded that Fujifilm Synapse does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fujifilm Synapse
- A hospital replacing PACS that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitivenot Tebra
- A health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policynot Tebra
- An outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotelynot Tebra
- A site pursuing a deconstructed PACS strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archivenot Tebra
Tebra
- Consolidating scheduling, charting, billing into single systemnot Fujifilm Synapse
- Automating claims submission and denial managementnot Fujifilm Synapse
- Reducing appointment no-shows through automated remindersnot Fujifilm Synapse
- Reducing documentation time to five minutes with AInot Fujifilm Synapse
- E-prescribing controlled substances with PDMP and EPCSnot Fujifilm Synapse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fujifilm Synapse
- PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.
- Synapse 3D is licensed by concurrent user and sized from average concurrency, which leaves radiologists queued for advanced visualisation at the morning reading peak and forces an unplanned licence purchase.
- As an independent informatics vendor Fujifilm has less privileged access to proprietary modality data than Philips or Siemens have on their own scanners, so some vendor specific post processing is not available.
- The vendor neutral archive absorbs non DICOM object types only after per specialty configuration work, and departments such as ophthalmology and dermatology usually need bespoke ingestion projects that were not in the original scope.
- Migrating a decade of priors from a legacy archive is a large professional services line that Fujifilm quotes separately, and these migrations regularly run past the contracted go live date.
Tebra
- No pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration
- Pricing based on per-provider licensing model with additional costs for EPCS setup and PDMP integration
Pricing, plan by plan
Fujifilm Synapse
On request- Synapse$undefined/year
- Each module licensed separately: PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular, 3D
- Priced by annual study volume and concurrent diagnostic users
- Synapse 3D licensed by concurrent user, separate from PACS
Tebra
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Tebra review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Fujifilm Synapse if
- You need synapse pacs.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want synapse vna.
Choose Tebra if
Nothing in the data separates Tebra from Fujifilm Synapse on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Fujifilm Synapse or Tebra better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fujifilm Synapse starts at On request and Tebra at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fujifilm Synapse or Tebra?
- Fujifilm Synapse starts at On request and Tebra at On request.
- Does Fujifilm Synapse or Tebra run on more platforms?
- Fujifilm Synapse runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android. Tebra runs on Web.
- What is Fujifilm Synapse best used for?
- Fujifilm Synapse is most often used for a hospital replacing pacs that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitive, a health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policy, an outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotely, a site pursuing a deconstructed pacs strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archive. Of those, a hospital replacing pacs that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitive and a health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policy are not what Tebra is typically brought in for.
- What can Fujifilm Synapse do that Tebra cannot?
- Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular, Synapse 3D.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fujifilm Synapse: Is Synapse one product or several?
Several. Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular and Synapse 3D are separately licensed products under one brand. Price and scope each one individually.
Tebra: How does Tebra's pricing model work?
Pricing is based on the number of clinical providers rather than user seats. Non-clinical staff get unlimited access at no additional cost. Low-volume providers billing under 100 claims monthly receive lower-tier pricing.
SourceFujifilm Synapse: Do I have to buy Fujifilm scanners?
No. Fujifilm sells Synapse independently of imaging hardware, which is a large part of why it wins competitive PACS replacements at mixed fleet sites.
Tebra: What are the setup and integration costs beyond the monthly fee?
Electronic Prescribing Controlled Substances (EPCS) setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee. PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus approximately $50 per user per year.
SourceFujifilm Synapse: Does Synapse publish pricing?
No. Pricing is quoted by study volume, concurrent users, module mix and storage capacity.
Tebra: Are there volume discounts for practices using multiple modules?
Yes, bundled pricing and volume incentives are available for multi-module adoption. Practices can request a personalized quote to see potential savings.
SourceFujifilm Synapse: Can Synapse VNA store non radiology images?
Yes, including visible light, ophthalmology and wound photography, but each specialty typically needs its own ingestion and metadata configuration project.
Tebra: Does Tebra offer published pricing or is a quote always required?
Tebra does not publish specific monthly costs. Pricing varies depending on the number of providers, platform features needed, and implementation requirements. A personalized quote is required to get pricing.
SourceRelated pages
More on Fujifilm Synapse
Other head to heads
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ambra Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Epic Systems
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sectra
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Visage Imaging
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Rad AI
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Gleamer
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Annalise.ai
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Nookal
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Lunit
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Flo
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Talkspace
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Practice Fusion
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ro
- Fujifilm Synapse vs RXNT
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Signant Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sysmex
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Athenahealth
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Cerner
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Amwell
- Fujifilm Synapse vs ChiroTouch
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Dentrix
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Updox
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Kareo
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Healthie
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Bahmni
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Carestream Dental
- Fujifilm Synapse vs athenaOne
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Kareo Clinical
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Tebra vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Tebra vs Ambra Health
- Tebra vs Epic Systems
- Tebra vs Sectra
- Tebra vs Visage Imaging
- Tebra vs Rad AI
- Tebra vs Gleamer
- Tebra vs Annalise.ai
- Tebra vs Nookal
- Tebra vs Lunit
- Tebra vs Flo
- Tebra vs Talkspace
- Tebra vs Practice Fusion
- Tebra vs Ro
- Tebra vs RXNT
- Tebra vs Signant Health
- Tebra vs Sysmex
- Tebra vs Athenahealth
- Tebra vs Cerner
- Tebra vs Amwell
- Tebra vs ChiroTouch
- Tebra vs Dentrix
- Tebra vs Updox
- Tebra vs Kareo
- Tebra vs Healthie
- Tebra vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Tebra vs Bahmni
- Tebra vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Tebra vs Carestream Dental
- Tebra vs athenaOne
- Tebra vs Kareo Clinical
- Tebra vs Allscripts TouchWorks
