Healthcare · head to head
Fujifilm Synapse vs Nookal

Fujifilm Synapse
Healthcare
Enterprise imaging platform covering PACS, VNA, cardiology and 3D from Fujifilm Healthcare
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Nookal
Healthcare
Australian allied health practice management priced per practitioner with usage charges on top
- From
- 49/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fujifilm Synapse pACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.; Nookal the features most multi-practitioner clinics need, including advanced reporting, custom forms and automated recalls, are held back to the Professional tier, so the AUD 49 entry price is not a realistic budget for anything beyond a solo practice.
- They diverge on capability: Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS, Nookal covers Per practitioner pricing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fujifilm Synapse and Nookal actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fujifilm Synapse | Nookal |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | 49/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fujifilm Synapse
- Synapse PACS
- Synapse VNA
- Synapse Cardiovascular
- Synapse 3D
- Synapse Mobility
- Deconstructed PACS support
- Cloud services
Only in Nookal
- Per practitioner pricing
- Clinical notes
- Online booking
- Automated recalls
- KPI dashboards
- Claiming
- Patient portal
- AI and voice
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fujifilm Synapse
- A hospital replacing PACS that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitivenot Nookal
- A health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policynot Nookal
- An outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotelynot Nookal
- A site pursuing a deconstructed PACS strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archivenot Nookal
Nookal
- A three to ten practitioner physiotherapy clinic in Australia that wants Medicare claiming and published pricing rather than a quote processnot Fujifilm Synapse
- A New Zealand practice that needs ACC claim submission integrated with its clinical notes and billingnot Fujifilm Synapse
- A chiropractic group opening a second location that wants shared patient records and one reporting view across sitesnot Fujifilm Synapse
- A UK or Irish allied health clinic that wants an Australian-style clinical workflow with GBP or EUR billingnot Fujifilm Synapse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fujifilm Synapse
- PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.
- Synapse 3D is licensed by concurrent user and sized from average concurrency, which leaves radiologists queued for advanced visualisation at the morning reading peak and forces an unplanned licence purchase.
- As an independent informatics vendor Fujifilm has less privileged access to proprietary modality data than Philips or Siemens have on their own scanners, so some vendor specific post processing is not available.
- The vendor neutral archive absorbs non DICOM object types only after per specialty configuration work, and departments such as ophthalmology and dermatology usually need bespoke ingestion projects that were not in the original scope.
- Migrating a decade of priors from a legacy archive is a large professional services line that Fujifilm quotes separately, and these migrations regularly run past the contracted go live date.
Nookal
- The features most multi-practitioner clinics need, including advanced reporting, custom forms and automated recalls, are held back to the Professional tier, so the AUD 49 entry price is not a realistic budget for anything beyond a solo practice.
- Add-ons stack quickly: AI and voice at about USD 25 per active licence, the patient portal from USD 10 per location and secure messaging from USD 1.50 per user can push a seat close to double its list price.
- Pricing is not a simple currency conversion, with the USD Essentials tier at 65 and Professional at 89 against AUD 49 and 59, so overseas clinics pay a meaningful premium for the same software.
- Messaging and claiming are metered per SMS and per claim, so a clinic that leans on reminders to control no-shows finds a variable line item that grows with appointment volume and is easy to underestimate at purchase.
- Single sign-on is quoted rather than listed and sits with the Enterprise tier, which puts basic identity governance out of reach for mid-sized groups that would otherwise stay on Professional.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fujifilm Synapse
On request- Synapse$undefined/year
- Each module licensed separately: PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular, 3D
- Priced by annual study volume and concurrent diagnostic users
- Synapse 3D licensed by concurrent user, separate from PACS
Nookal
49/month- Essentials$49/month
- Per practitioner per month
- Appointments, patient records and invoicing
- Online booking
- Professional$59/month
- Per practitioner per month
- Advanced reporting and KPI dashboards
- Custom forms
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Quoted pricing
- Multi-account management
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Fujifilm Synapse if
- You need synapse pacs.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want synapse vna.
Choose Nookal if
- You need per practitioner pricing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want clinical notes.
Questions people ask
- Is Fujifilm Synapse or Nookal better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fujifilm Synapse starts at On request and Nookal at 49/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fujifilm Synapse or Nookal?
- Fujifilm Synapse starts at On request and Nookal at 49/month.
- Does Fujifilm Synapse or Nookal run on more platforms?
- Fujifilm Synapse runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android. Nookal runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Fujifilm Synapse best used for?
- Fujifilm Synapse is most often used for a hospital replacing pacs that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitive, a health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policy, an outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotely, a site pursuing a deconstructed pacs strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archive. Of those, a hospital replacing pacs that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitive and a health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policy are not what Nookal is typically brought in for.
- What can Fujifilm Synapse do that Nookal cannot?
- Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular, Synapse 3D. Nookal covers Per practitioner pricing, Clinical notes, Online booking, Automated recalls.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fujifilm Synapse: Is Synapse one product or several?
Several. Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular and Synapse 3D are separately licensed products under one brand. Price and scope each one individually.
Nookal: How much does Nookal cost per practitioner?
Essentials is AUD 49 per practitioner per month and Professional is AUD 59, with published equivalents of GBP 29 and 39, EUR 65 and 89, and USD 65 and 89. Enterprise is quoted.
Fujifilm Synapse: Do I have to buy Fujifilm scanners?
No. Fujifilm sells Synapse independently of imaging hardware, which is a large part of why it wins competitive PACS replacements at mixed fleet sites.
Nookal: What is not included in the subscription?
SMS from about 7 cents per message, Medicare claims from about 10 cents, ACC claims at about 12 cents, the patient portal, secure messaging, AI and voice, and single sign-on are all charged separately.
Fujifilm Synapse: Does Synapse publish pricing?
No. Pricing is quoted by study volume, concurrent users, module mix and storage capacity.
Nookal: Is there a contract?
No lock-in contract, and the free trial does not require a credit card.
Fujifilm Synapse: Can Synapse VNA store non radiology images?
Yes, including visible light, ophthalmology and wound photography, but each specialty typically needs its own ingestion and metadata configuration project.
Nookal: Which countries does the claiming work in?
Medicare claiming is Australian and ACC claiming is New Zealand. Elsewhere the software works but you invoice and reconcile manually.
Related pages
More on Fujifilm Synapse
Other head to heads
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ambra Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Epic Systems
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sectra
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Visage Imaging
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Rad AI
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Gleamer
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Annalise.ai
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Lunit
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Flo
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Talkspace
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Practice Fusion
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ro
- Fujifilm Synapse vs RXNT
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Signant Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sysmex
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Jane App
- Fujifilm Synapse vs SimplePractice
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Cliniko
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Zanda Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Halaxy
- Fujifilm Synapse vs ChiroTouch
- Fujifilm Synapse vs TheraNest
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Dentrix
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Doctolib
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Open Dental
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Athenahealth
- Fujifilm Synapse vs DrChrono
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Medscape
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Meru Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs NextGen Healthcare
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Oracle Clinical One
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Phreesia
- Nookal vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Nookal vs Ambra Health
- Nookal vs Epic Systems
- Nookal vs Sectra
- Nookal vs Visage Imaging
- Nookal vs Rad AI
- Nookal vs Gleamer
- Nookal vs Annalise.ai
- Nookal vs Lunit
- Nookal vs Flo
- Nookal vs Talkspace
- Nookal vs Practice Fusion
- Nookal vs Ro
- Nookal vs RXNT
- Nookal vs Signant Health
- Nookal vs Sysmex
- Nookal vs Jane App
- Nookal vs SimplePractice
- Nookal vs Cliniko
- Nookal vs Zanda Health
- Nookal vs Halaxy
- Nookal vs ChiroTouch
- Nookal vs TheraNest
- Nookal vs Dentrix
- Nookal vs Doctolib
- Nookal vs Open Dental
- Nookal vs Athenahealth
- Nookal vs DrChrono
- Nookal vs Medscape
- Nookal vs Meru Health
- Nookal vs NextGen Healthcare
- Nookal vs Oracle Clinical One
- Nookal vs Phreesia
