Softwr

Healthcare · head to head

Beckman Coulter DxONE vs Fujifilm Synapse

Beckman Coulter DxONE logo

Beckman Coulter DxONE

Healthcare

Clinical laboratory middleware and informatics from a diagnostics instrument manufacturer

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Fujifilm Synapse logo

Fujifilm Synapse

Healthcare

Enterprise imaging platform covering PACS, VNA, cardiology and 3D from Fujifilm Healthcare

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Beckman Coulter DxONE the rules and quality control workflows are tuned to Beckman analysers, so laboratories with a mixed Roche, Abbott and Siemens fleet get materially less coverage and typically buy vendor neutral middleware such as Data Innovations Instrument Manager instead.; Fujifilm Synapse pACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.
  • They diverge on capability: Beckman Coulter DxONE covers DxONE Command Central, Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Beckman Coulter DxONE and Fujifilm Synapse actually diverge.

Attributes where Beckman Coulter DxONE and Fujifilm Synapse differ
AttributeBeckman Coulter DxONEFujifilm Synapse
PlatformsWeb, WindowsWeb, Windows, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Beckman Coulter DxONE

  • DxONE Command Central
  • DxONE Workflow Manager
  • REMISOL Advance
  • DxONE Inventory Manager
  • Autoverification rules
  • Quality control monitoring
  • LIS interfacing

Only in Fujifilm Synapse

  • Synapse PACS
  • Synapse VNA
  • Synapse Cardiovascular
  • Synapse 3D
  • Synapse Mobility
  • Deconstructed PACS support
  • Cloud services

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Beckman Coulter DxONE

  • A hospital laboratory standardising on Beckman DxC and DxI analysers that wants autoverification to release the majority of routine chemistry without technologist reviewnot Fujifilm Synapse
  • A low volume rural laboratory that cannot justify on premises middleware servers and needs a cloud hosted rules enginenot Fujifilm Synapse
  • A multi site laboratory network that needs identical autoverification rules applied consistently across every site, which REMISOL Advance is built fornot Fujifilm Synapse
  • A laboratory whose LIS cannot express delta checks or repeat rules and needs that logic to live in middleware insteadnot Fujifilm Synapse

Fujifilm Synapse

  • A hospital replacing PACS that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitivenot Beckman Coulter DxONE
  • A health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policynot Beckman Coulter DxONE
  • An outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotelynot Beckman Coulter DxONE
  • A site pursuing a deconstructed PACS strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archivenot Beckman Coulter DxONE

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Beckman Coulter DxONE

  • The rules and quality control workflows are tuned to Beckman analysers, so laboratories with a mixed Roche, Abbott and Siemens fleet get materially less coverage and typically buy vendor neutral middleware such as Data Innovations Instrument Manager instead.
  • Pricing is bundled into analyser and reagent contracts rather than itemised, so a laboratory cannot compare the informatics cost against a standalone middleware quote and often does not know what it is paying for the software.
  • Because the software is tied to a reagent rental term, the real cost of switching middleware is the remaining years of the reagent commitment, not a software renewal, which locks the laboratory in far longer than a software contract would.
  • DxONE Workflow Manager and REMISOL Advance are different products with different rule engines rather than one product at two sizes, so a laboratory that grows out of Workflow Manager faces a migration and rule rewrite, not an upgrade.
  • Interface builds to the hospital LIS are professional services work quoted per interface, and laboratories consistently underestimate this line, particularly where the LIS is an older Sunquest or SCC installation.

Fujifilm Synapse

  • PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.
  • Synapse 3D is licensed by concurrent user and sized from average concurrency, which leaves radiologists queued for advanced visualisation at the morning reading peak and forces an unplanned licence purchase.
  • As an independent informatics vendor Fujifilm has less privileged access to proprietary modality data than Philips or Siemens have on their own scanners, so some vendor specific post processing is not available.
  • The vendor neutral archive absorbs non DICOM object types only after per specialty configuration work, and departments such as ophthalmology and dermatology usually need bespoke ingestion projects that were not in the original scope.
  • Migrating a decade of priors from a legacy archive is a large professional services line that Fujifilm quotes separately, and these migrations regularly run past the contracted go live date.

Pricing, plan by plan

Beckman Coulter DxONE

On request
  • DxONE$undefined/year
    • Quoted as part of an analyser or reagent contract, not as standalone software
    • Priced against instrument fleet size and test volume
    • Multi year reagent rental agreements are the usual commercial vehicle

Fujifilm Synapse

On request
  • Synapse$undefined/year
    • Each module licensed separately: PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular, 3D
    • Priced by annual study volume and concurrent diagnostic users
    • Synapse 3D licensed by concurrent user, separate from PACS

Which should you pick?

Choose Beckman Coulter DxONE if

  • You need dxone command central.
  • You work on Web, Windows.
  • You also want dxone workflow manager.
Beckman Coulter DxONE review

Choose Fujifilm Synapse if

  • You need synapse pacs.
  • You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
  • You also want synapse vna.
Fujifilm Synapse review

Questions people ask

Is Beckman Coulter DxONE or Fujifilm Synapse better?
Neither clearly leads. Beckman Coulter DxONE starts at On request and Fujifilm Synapse at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Beckman Coulter DxONE or Fujifilm Synapse?
Beckman Coulter DxONE starts at On request and Fujifilm Synapse at On request.
Does Beckman Coulter DxONE or Fujifilm Synapse run on more platforms?
Beckman Coulter DxONE runs on Web, Windows. Fujifilm Synapse runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
What is Beckman Coulter DxONE best used for?
Beckman Coulter DxONE is most often used for a hospital laboratory standardising on beckman dxc and dxi analysers that wants autoverification to release the majority of routine chemistry without technologist review, a low volume rural laboratory that cannot justify on premises middleware servers and needs a cloud hosted rules engine, a multi site laboratory network that needs identical autoverification rules applied consistently across every site, which remisol advance is built for, a laboratory whose lis cannot express delta checks or repeat rules and needs that logic to live in middleware instead. Of those, a hospital laboratory standardising on beckman dxc and dxi analysers that wants autoverification to release the majority of routine chemistry without technologist review and a low volume rural laboratory that cannot justify on premises middleware servers and needs a cloud hosted rules engine are not what Fujifilm Synapse is typically brought in for.
What can Beckman Coulter DxONE do that Fujifilm Synapse cannot?
Beckman Coulter DxONE covers DxONE Command Central, DxONE Workflow Manager, REMISOL Advance, DxONE Inventory Manager. Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular, Synapse 3D.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Beckman Coulter DxONE: Can I buy DxONE without buying Beckman analysers?

Not realistically. It is quoted as part of an instrument or reagent agreement and its value is in the depth of integration with Beckman platforms. A laboratory with other analysers should look at vendor neutral middleware.

Fujifilm Synapse: Is Synapse one product or several?

Several. Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular and Synapse 3D are separately licensed products under one brand. Price and scope each one individually.

Beckman Coulter DxONE: Is DxONE the same as REMISOL Advance?

No. REMISOL Advance is the on premises middleware for higher volume and multi site laboratories. DxONE Workflow Manager is a separate cloud product aimed at low volume laboratories. They are not the same rule engine.

Fujifilm Synapse: Do I have to buy Fujifilm scanners?

No. Fujifilm sells Synapse independently of imaging hardware, which is a large part of why it wins competitive PACS replacements at mixed fleet sites.

Beckman Coulter DxONE: Does Beckman publish pricing?

No. Everything is quoted, and the software cost is usually folded into a cost per reportable result on a reagent contract rather than shown as a licence fee.

Fujifilm Synapse: Does Synapse publish pricing?

No. Pricing is quoted by study volume, concurrent users, module mix and storage capacity.

Beckman Coulter DxONE: Is DxONE a regulated medical device?

The middleware components carry regulatory registrations that vary by product and region. Autoverification of diagnostic results is a regulated function, so confirm the specific clearance for the module and country before deployment.

Fujifilm Synapse: Can Synapse VNA store non radiology images?

Yes, including visible light, ophthalmology and wound photography, but each specialty typically needs its own ingestion and metadata configuration project.

Share

Related pages

More on Beckman Coulter DxONE

More on Fujifilm Synapse

Keep looking

Other head to heads