Healthcare · head to head
Fujifilm Synapse vs Practice Fusion

Fujifilm Synapse
Healthcare
Enterprise imaging platform covering PACS, VNA, cardiology and 3D from Fujifilm Healthcare
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Practice Fusion has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fujifilm Synapse pACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.; Practice Fusion cloud-based architecture requires constant internet connectivity
- They diverge on capability: Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS, Practice Fusion covers Electronic Health Records.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fujifilm Synapse and Practice Fusion actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fujifilm Synapse | Practice Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2005 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fujifilm Synapse
- Synapse PACS
- Synapse VNA
- Synapse Cardiovascular
- Synapse 3D
- Synapse Mobility
- Deconstructed PACS support
- Cloud services
Only in Practice Fusion
- Electronic Health Records
- e-Prescribing
- Lab Orders
- Patient Portal
- Scheduling
- Labs
- Pharmacies
- Imaging Centers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fujifilm Synapse
- A hospital replacing PACS that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitivenot Practice Fusion
- A health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policynot Practice Fusion
- An outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotelynot Practice Fusion
- A site pursuing a deconstructed PACS strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archivenot Practice Fusion
Practice Fusion
- Small to medium medical practicesnot Fujifilm Synapse
- Primary care clinicsnot Fujifilm Synapse
- Independent clinicians needing electronic chartingnot Fujifilm Synapse
- Practice management and billing workflowsnot Fujifilm Synapse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fujifilm Synapse
- PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular and 3D are separately licensed and separately versioned, so an enterprise deployment means four upgrade cycles and four support relationships under one brand rather than one platform upgrade.
- Synapse 3D is licensed by concurrent user and sized from average concurrency, which leaves radiologists queued for advanced visualisation at the morning reading peak and forces an unplanned licence purchase.
- As an independent informatics vendor Fujifilm has less privileged access to proprietary modality data than Philips or Siemens have on their own scanners, so some vendor specific post processing is not available.
- The vendor neutral archive absorbs non DICOM object types only after per specialty configuration work, and departments such as ophthalmology and dermatology usually need bespoke ingestion projects that were not in the original scope.
- Migrating a decade of priors from a legacy archive is a large professional services line that Fujifilm quotes separately, and these migrations regularly run past the contracted go live date.
Practice Fusion
- Cloud-based architecture requires constant internet connectivity
- Requires annual commitment for pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
Fujifilm Synapse
On request- Synapse$undefined/year
- Each module licensed separately: PACS, VNA, Cardiovascular, 3D
- Priced by annual study volume and concurrent diagnostic users
- Synapse 3D licensed by concurrent user, separate from PACS
Practice Fusion
Free- Standard$199/month
- Provider license with e-prescribing and chart signing
- 3 signing staff licenses included
- Unlimited non-signing staff licenses
Which should you pick?
Choose Fujifilm Synapse if
- You need synapse pacs.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want synapse vna.
Choose Practice Fusion if
- You need electronic health records.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want e-prescribing.
Questions people ask
- Is Fujifilm Synapse or Practice Fusion better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fujifilm Synapse starts at On request and Practice Fusion at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fujifilm Synapse or Practice Fusion?
- Practice Fusion has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Fujifilm Synapse and Free for Practice Fusion.
- Does Fujifilm Synapse or Practice Fusion run on more platforms?
- Fujifilm Synapse runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android. Practice Fusion runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Practice Fusion for free?
- Yes. Practice Fusion has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fujifilm Synapse starts at On request.
- What is Fujifilm Synapse best used for?
- Fujifilm Synapse is most often used for a hospital replacing pacs that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitive, a health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policy, an outpatient imaging chain that needs one worklist across multiple sites and radiologists reading remotely, a site pursuing a deconstructed pacs strategy that wants to replace the viewer later without touching the archive. Of those, a hospital replacing pacs that wants the archive decoupled from its scanner vendor so future modality purchases stay competitive and a health system consolidating radiology, cardiology, ophthalmology and wound images into one vendor neutral archive with a single retention policy are not what Practice Fusion is typically brought in for.
- What can Fujifilm Synapse do that Practice Fusion cannot?
- Fujifilm Synapse covers Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular, Synapse 3D. Practice Fusion covers Electronic Health Records, e-Prescribing, Lab Orders, Patient Portal.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fujifilm Synapse: Is Synapse one product or several?
Several. Synapse PACS, Synapse VNA, Synapse Cardiovascular and Synapse 3D are separately licensed products under one brand. Price and scope each one individually.
Practice Fusion: How much does Practice Fusion cost?
Practice Fusion starts at $199 per month per provider with an annual commitment required. The pricing includes 3 signing staff licenses and unlimited non-signing staff licenses.
SourceFujifilm Synapse: Do I have to buy Fujifilm scanners?
No. Fujifilm sells Synapse independently of imaging hardware, which is a large part of why it wins competitive PACS replacements at mixed fleet sites.
Practice Fusion: Does Practice Fusion offer a free trial?
Yes, Practice Fusion offers a complimentary 2-week trial with no commitment, no upfront costs, and no credit card required.
SourceFujifilm Synapse: Does Synapse publish pricing?
No. Pricing is quoted by study volume, concurrent users, module mix and storage capacity.
Fujifilm Synapse: Can Synapse VNA store non radiology images?
Yes, including visible light, ophthalmology and wound photography, but each specialty typically needs its own ingestion and metadata configuration project.
Related pages
More on Fujifilm Synapse
More on Practice Fusion
Other head to heads
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ambra Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Epic Systems
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sectra
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Visage Imaging
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Rad AI
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Gleamer
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Annalise.ai
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Nookal
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Lunit
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Flo
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Talkspace
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Ro
- Fujifilm Synapse vs RXNT
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Signant Health
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Sysmex
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Athenahealth
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Cerner
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Amwell
- Fujifilm Synapse vs DrChrono
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Kareo Clinical
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Fujifilm Synapse vs ChiroTouch
- Fujifilm Synapse vs NextGen Healthcare
- Fujifilm Synapse vs WebPT
- Fujifilm Synapse vs eClinicalWorks
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Healthie
- Fujifilm Synapse vs PioneerRx
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Aidoc
- Fujifilm Synapse vs Rx30
- Practice Fusion vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Practice Fusion vs Ambra Health
- Practice Fusion vs Epic Systems
- Practice Fusion vs Sectra
- Practice Fusion vs Visage Imaging
- Practice Fusion vs Rad AI
- Practice Fusion vs Gleamer
- Practice Fusion vs Annalise.ai
- Practice Fusion vs Nookal
- Practice Fusion vs Lunit
- Practice Fusion vs Flo
- Practice Fusion vs Talkspace
- Practice Fusion vs Ro
- Practice Fusion vs RXNT
- Practice Fusion vs Signant Health
- Practice Fusion vs Sysmex
- Practice Fusion vs Athenahealth
- Practice Fusion vs Cerner
- Practice Fusion vs Amwell
- Practice Fusion vs DrChrono
- Practice Fusion vs Kareo Clinical
- Practice Fusion vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Practice Fusion vs ChiroTouch
- Practice Fusion vs NextGen Healthcare
- Practice Fusion vs WebPT
- Practice Fusion vs eClinicalWorks
- Practice Fusion vs Healthie
- Practice Fusion vs PioneerRx
- Practice Fusion vs Aidoc
- Practice Fusion vs Rx30

