Softwr

Healthcare · head to head

Philips IntelliSpace PACS vs Tebra

Philips IntelliSpace PACS logo

Philips IntelliSpace PACS

Healthcare

Enterprise radiology PACS and diagnostic image viewing from Philips

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Tebra logo

Tebra

Healthcare

Practice management combining EHR, billing and patient engagement for independent practices

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Philips IntelliSpace PACS philips has consolidated its imaging marketing under Philips Enterprise Imaging and several IntelliSpace PACS regional pages now redirect to a generic medical imaging page, so a buyer signing a long PACS term should demand a written product lifecycle and version support statement before committing.; Tebra no pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Philips IntelliSpace PACS and Tebra actually diverge.

Attributes where Philips IntelliSpace PACS and Tebra differ
AttributePhilips IntelliSpace PACSTebra
PlatformsWeb, WindowsWeb

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Philips IntelliSpace PACS

  • Diagnostic reading client
  • Zero footprint web viewer
  • Enterprise archive
  • Advanced visualisation
  • IntelliSpace Radiology on AWS
  • Worklist and workflow
  • AI results integration

Only in Tebra

Nothing recorded that Philips IntelliSpace PACS does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS

  • A hospital replacing an end of life PACS that already runs a large Philips CT and MR estate and wants modality and reading integration in one support contractnot Tebra
  • A radiology group consolidating several departmental archives into one enterprise archive with a single radiologist worklistnot Tebra
  • A health system that wants to move diagnostic reading off local workstations into a cloud hosted environment via the AWS listingnot Tebra
  • Sites that need server side advanced visualisation so radiologists can do 3D and vessel work without dedicated 3D workstationsnot Tebra

Tebra

  • Consolidating scheduling, charting, billing into single systemnot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
  • Automating claims submission and denial managementnot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
  • Reducing appointment no-shows through automated remindersnot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
  • Reducing documentation time to five minutes with AInot Philips IntelliSpace PACS
  • E-prescribing controlled substances with PDMP and EPCSnot Philips IntelliSpace PACS

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS

  • Philips has consolidated its imaging marketing under Philips Enterprise Imaging and several IntelliSpace PACS regional pages now redirect to a generic medical imaging page, so a buyer signing a long PACS term should demand a written product lifecycle and version support statement before committing.
  • Advanced visualisation is licensed by concurrent user separately from the base PACS, so a department that sizes concurrency from average use finds radiologists blocked at the morning peak and buys more licences after go live.
  • The deepest integration is with Philips modalities, so sites running mixed GE and Siemens scanner fleets get less of the workflow benefit than the demonstration environment implies.
  • Third party AI findings arrive through a results interface rather than natively in the hanging protocol, so radiologists context switch to see algorithm output and adoption of purchased AI is lower than expected.
  • Data migration from a legacy PACS is a separate, large and often underquoted professional services line, and migrations of a decade of priors routinely run longer than the go live plan allows.

Tebra

  • No pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration
  • Pricing based on per-provider licensing model with additional costs for EPCS setup and PDMP integration

Pricing, plan by plan

Philips IntelliSpace PACS

On request
  • IntelliSpace PACS$undefined/year
    • Priced by annual study volume and concurrent diagnostic users
    • Advanced visualisation licensed separately by concurrent user
    • Storage and archive tiering priced by capacity

Tebra

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Tebra review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Philips IntelliSpace PACS if

  • You need diagnostic reading client.
  • You work on Web, Windows.
  • You also want zero footprint web viewer.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS review

Choose Tebra if

Nothing in the data separates Tebra from Philips IntelliSpace PACS on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Tebra review

Questions people ask

Is Philips IntelliSpace PACS or Tebra better?
Neither clearly leads. Philips IntelliSpace PACS starts at On request and Tebra at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Philips IntelliSpace PACS or Tebra?
Philips IntelliSpace PACS starts at On request and Tebra at On request.
Does Philips IntelliSpace PACS or Tebra run on more platforms?
Philips IntelliSpace PACS runs on Web, Windows. Tebra runs on Web.
What is Philips IntelliSpace PACS best used for?
Philips IntelliSpace PACS is most often used for a hospital replacing an end of life pacs that already runs a large philips ct and mr estate and wants modality and reading integration in one support contract, a radiology group consolidating several departmental archives into one enterprise archive with a single radiologist worklist, a health system that wants to move diagnostic reading off local workstations into a cloud hosted environment via the aws listing, sites that need server side advanced visualisation so radiologists can do 3d and vessel work without dedicated 3d workstations. Of those, a hospital replacing an end of life pacs that already runs a large philips ct and mr estate and wants modality and reading integration in one support contract and a radiology group consolidating several departmental archives into one enterprise archive with a single radiologist worklist are not what Tebra is typically brought in for.
What can Philips IntelliSpace PACS do that Tebra cannot?
Philips IntelliSpace PACS covers Diagnostic reading client, Zero footprint web viewer, Enterprise archive, Advanced visualisation.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Is IntelliSpace PACS being discontinued?

It is still sold and supported, but Philips has moved its marketing to Philips Enterprise Imaging and some regional IntelliSpace product pages now redirect. Ask Philips for the written lifecycle statement before signing a multi year term.

Tebra: How does Tebra's pricing model work?

Pricing is based on the number of clinical providers rather than user seats. Non-clinical staff get unlimited access at no additional cost. Low-volume providers billing under 100 claims monthly receive lower-tier pricing.

Source
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Can I run it in the cloud?

Yes. Philips lists IntelliSpace Radiology on AWS Marketplace, and Philips also offers a managed hosted deployment. Both are quoted rather than self service.

Tebra: What are the setup and integration costs beyond the monthly fee?

Electronic Prescribing Controlled Substances (EPCS) setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee. PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus approximately $50 per user per year.

Source
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Does Philips publish pricing?

No. Pricing is by study volume, concurrent diagnostic users and storage, and is usually negotiated alongside modality capital.

Tebra: Are there volume discounts for practices using multiple modules?

Yes, bundled pricing and volume incentives are available for multi-module adoption. Practices can request a personalized quote to see potential savings.

Source
Philips IntelliSpace PACS: Will it read images from non Philips scanners?

Yes, it is a standard DICOM archive and viewer. The gap is in advanced visualisation and modality workflow integration, which is deeper on Philips equipment.

Tebra: Does Tebra offer published pricing or is a quote always required?

Tebra does not publish specific monthly costs. Pricing varies depending on the number of providers, platform features needed, and implementation requirements. A personalized quote is required to get pricing.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Philips IntelliSpace PACS

More on Tebra

Keep looking

Other head to heads