Healthcare · head to head
Bahmni vs Tebra

Bahmni
Healthcare
Open source hospital information system and EMR for low-resource hospitals, built on OpenMRS
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Tebra
Healthcare
Practice management combining EHR, billing and patient engagement for independent practices
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Bahmni has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Bahmni the licence is free and the implementation is not; configuration, data migration, training and multi-year support from a partner routinely cost far more than a small commercial system would have, and hospitals that budget only for hardware stall.; Tebra no pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bahmni and Tebra actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bahmni
- OpenMRS clinical record
- Configurable clinical forms
- Laboratory integration
- Billing and inventory
- Imaging
- Inpatient management
- Offline-capable clinical app
- Reporting
Only in Tebra
Nothing recorded that Bahmni does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bahmni
- A mission or charitable hospital in India or East Africa that cannot fund a commercial hospital information system licence but needs a real EMR rather than papernot Tebra
- A ministry of health standardising district hospitals on one system and required by donors to use a recognised Digital Public Goodnot Tebra
- An NGO health network wanting one clinical record across several facilities with reporting that can feed a national DHIS2 instancenot Tebra
- A hospital that needs the clinical record, laboratory, pharmacy and billing to share one patient identity rather than running four disconnected systemsnot Tebra
Tebra
- Consolidating scheduling, charting, billing into single systemnot Bahmni
- Automating claims submission and denial managementnot Bahmni
- Reducing appointment no-shows through automated remindersnot Bahmni
- Reducing documentation time to five minutes with AInot Bahmni
- E-prescribing controlled substances with PDMP and EPCSnot Bahmni
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bahmni
- The licence is free and the implementation is not; configuration, data migration, training and multi-year support from a partner routinely cost far more than a small commercial system would have, and hospitals that budget only for hardware stall.
- There is no single vendor with an obligation to you unless you contract one, so upgrade timing, security patching and defect resolution depend on whichever partner you hired and how long they stay engaged.
- It integrates four substantial open source systems, which means an upgrade touches OpenMRS, OpenELIS, Odoo and the imaging stack together, and hospitals with heavy customisation often freeze on an old version rather than risk it.
- Skilled Bahmni implementers are concentrated in a small number of firms in India and a few African countries, so a hospital outside those markets may find nobody local who can support it.
- Funding for the coalition and its shared engineering comes from donors and member contributions rather than licence revenue, which makes the pace of core development dependent on grant cycles rather than on customer demand.
Tebra
- No pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration
- Pricing based on per-provider licensing model with additional costs for EPCS setup and PDMP integration
Pricing, plan by plan
Bahmni
Free- BahmniFree
- AGPL open source, no licence fee
- All modules included
- Community support via forum and documentation
Tebra
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Tebra review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Bahmni if
- You need openmrs clinical record.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Android.
- You also want configurable clinical forms.
Choose Tebra if
Nothing in the data separates Tebra from Bahmni on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Bahmni or Tebra better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bahmni starts at Free and Tebra at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bahmni or Tebra?
- Bahmni has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Bahmni and On request for Tebra.
- Does Bahmni or Tebra run on more platforms?
- Bahmni runs on Web, Linux, Android. Tebra runs on Web.
- Can I use Bahmni for free?
- Yes. Bahmni has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Tebra starts at On request.
- What is Bahmni best used for?
- Bahmni is most often used for a mission or charitable hospital in india or east africa that cannot fund a commercial hospital information system licence but needs a real emr rather than paper, a ministry of health standardising district hospitals on one system and required by donors to use a recognised digital public good, an ngo health network wanting one clinical record across several facilities with reporting that can feed a national dhis2 instance, a hospital that needs the clinical record, laboratory, pharmacy and billing to share one patient identity rather than running four disconnected systems. Of those, a mission or charitable hospital in india or east africa that cannot fund a commercial hospital information system licence but needs a real emr rather than paper and a ministry of health standardising district hospitals on one system and required by donors to use a recognised digital public good are not what Tebra is typically brought in for.
- What can Bahmni do that Tebra cannot?
- Bahmni covers OpenMRS clinical record, Configurable clinical forms, Laboratory integration, Billing and inventory.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bahmni: Is Bahmni free?
The software is, under an open source licence. Implementation, hosting, configuration, training and support are charged by whichever partner you engage.
Tebra: How does Tebra's pricing model work?
Pricing is based on the number of clinical providers rather than user seats. Non-clinical staff get unlimited access at no additional cost. Low-volume providers billing under 100 claims monthly receive lower-tier pricing.
SourceBahmni: Who owns and governs Bahmni?
Thoughtworks transferred ownership in October 2017 to the Bahmni Coalition, under the fiscal sponsorship of the non-profit OpenMRS Inc. Thoughtworks remains on the governing committee.
Tebra: What are the setup and integration costs beyond the monthly fee?
Electronic Prescribing Controlled Substances (EPCS) setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee. PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus approximately $50 per user per year.
SourceBahmni: What does an implementation actually cost?
It varies by hospital size and country, but expect the dominant costs to be partner services, training and multi-year support rather than software or hardware. Get a fixed-scope quote covering upgrades, not just go-live.
Tebra: Are there volume discounts for practices using multiple modules?
Yes, bundled pricing and volume incentives are available for multi-module adoption. Practices can request a personalized quote to see potential savings.
SourceBahmni: Is it a recognised Digital Public Good?
Yes, Bahmni is on the Digital Public Goods Alliance register, which is increasingly a condition of donor funding for health information systems.
Tebra: Does Tebra offer published pricing or is a quote always required?
Tebra does not publish specific monthly costs. Pricing varies depending on the number of providers, platform features needed, and implementation requirements. A personalized quote is required to get pricing.
SourceBahmni: Where is it used?
More than 500 implementations across roughly 50 countries, concentrated in South Asia and Africa.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bahmni vs OpenMRS
- Bahmni vs DHIS2
- Bahmni vs GNU Health
- Bahmni vs OpenClinica
- Bahmni vs Open Dental
- Bahmni vs Doctolib
- Bahmni vs Ambra Health
- Bahmni vs Clue
- Bahmni vs Meditech
- Bahmni vs Medscape
- Bahmni vs Cerner
- Bahmni vs PioneerRx
- Bahmni vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Bahmni vs Rad AI
- Bahmni vs Aidoc
- Bahmni vs Annalise.ai
- Bahmni vs Rx30
- Bahmni vs Athenahealth
- Bahmni vs Epic Systems
- Bahmni vs Amwell
- Bahmni vs ChiroTouch
- Bahmni vs Dentrix
- Bahmni vs RXNT
- Bahmni vs Updox
- Bahmni vs Kareo
- Bahmni vs Healthie
- Bahmni vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Bahmni vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Bahmni vs Carestream Dental
- Bahmni vs athenaOne
- Bahmni vs Kareo Clinical
- Bahmni vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Tebra vs OpenMRS
- Tebra vs DHIS2
- Tebra vs GNU Health
- Tebra vs OpenClinica
- Tebra vs Open Dental
- Tebra vs Doctolib
- Tebra vs Ambra Health
- Tebra vs Clue
- Tebra vs Meditech
- Tebra vs Medscape
- Tebra vs Cerner
- Tebra vs PioneerRx
- Tebra vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Tebra vs Rad AI
- Tebra vs Aidoc
- Tebra vs Annalise.ai
- Tebra vs Rx30
- Tebra vs Athenahealth
- Tebra vs Epic Systems
- Tebra vs Amwell
- Tebra vs ChiroTouch
- Tebra vs Dentrix
- Tebra vs RXNT
- Tebra vs Updox
- Tebra vs Kareo
- Tebra vs Healthie
- Tebra vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Tebra vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Tebra vs Carestream Dental
- Tebra vs athenaOne
- Tebra vs Kareo Clinical
- Tebra vs Allscripts TouchWorks
