Healthcare · head to head
Ambra Health vs Tebra

Ambra Health
Healthcare
Cloud medical image exchange and vendor neutral archive, now part of Intelerad
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tebra
Healthcare
Practice management combining EHR, billing and patient engagement for independent practices
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ambra Health intelerad now owns Ambra and ambrahealth.com redirects to Intelerad client support, so a buyer is committing to the Intelerad portfolio roadmap and should get written positioning on Ambra versus Intelerad own cloud PACS before signing.; Tebra no pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ambra Health and Tebra actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ambra Health | Tebra |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ambra Health
- Image exchange
- Cloud VNA
- Zero footprint viewer
- Patient upload portal
- Identity reconciliation
- Clinical trials workflow
- API and HL7 integration
Only in Tebra
Nothing recorded that Ambra Health does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ambra Health
- A trauma centre that receives transfers from regional hospitals and needs outside CT studies readable before the patient arrives, not after a disc is walked innot Tebra
- An oncology programme collecting outside imaging for multidisciplinary tumour board review from dozens of referring practicesnot Tebra
- A clinical research organisation routing de identified trial imaging from many sites to one central reading facilitynot Tebra
- A health system trying to eliminate the CD import desk by giving patients and referring practices a direct upload portalnot Tebra
Tebra
- Consolidating scheduling, charting, billing into single systemnot Ambra Health
- Automating claims submission and denial managementnot Ambra Health
- Reducing appointment no-shows through automated remindersnot Ambra Health
- Reducing documentation time to five minutes with AInot Ambra Health
- E-prescribing controlled substances with PDMP and EPCSnot Ambra Health
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ambra Health
- Intelerad now owns Ambra and ambrahealth.com redirects to Intelerad client support, so a buyer is committing to the Intelerad portfolio roadmap and should get written positioning on Ambra versus Intelerad own cloud PACS before signing.
- Ambra is built for cross organisation exchange, not for high volume in department diagnostic reading, so a radiology group that expects it to replace a departmental PACS finds the reading ergonomics and hanging protocols thinner than a dedicated PACS client.
- Pricing scales with study volume and stored capacity, so a health system that turns on patient upload broadly sees storage grow from low value outside studies it never intended to retain, and the renewal reflects that.
- Identity reconciliation of studies arriving with foreign patient identifiers still needs human review at volume, and sites that budget for zero touch matching end up staffing an imaging records queue.
- Adoption depends on referring practices actually using the portal, and the vendor cannot make that happen, so image exchange projects frequently stall at the outreach and change management step rather than at the technology.
Tebra
- No pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration
- Pricing based on per-provider licensing model with additional costs for EPCS setup and PDMP integration
Pricing, plan by plan
Ambra Health
On request- Ambra Health$undefined/year
- Priced by annual study volume and stored capacity
- Exchange partner connections and upload portals scoped per deployment
- Zero footprint viewer licensed with the platform
Tebra
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Tebra review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Ambra Health if
- You need image exchange.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want cloud vna.
Choose Tebra if
Nothing in the data separates Tebra from Ambra Health on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Ambra Health or Tebra better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ambra Health starts at On request and Tebra at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ambra Health or Tebra?
- Ambra Health starts at On request and Tebra at On request.
- Does Ambra Health or Tebra run on more platforms?
- Ambra Health runs on Web, iOS, Android. Tebra runs on Web.
- What is Ambra Health best used for?
- Ambra Health is most often used for a trauma centre that receives transfers from regional hospitals and needs outside ct studies readable before the patient arrives, not after a disc is walked in, an oncology programme collecting outside imaging for multidisciplinary tumour board review from dozens of referring practices, a clinical research organisation routing de identified trial imaging from many sites to one central reading facility, a health system trying to eliminate the cd import desk by giving patients and referring practices a direct upload portal. Of those, a trauma centre that receives transfers from regional hospitals and needs outside ct studies readable before the patient arrives, not after a disc is walked in and an oncology programme collecting outside imaging for multidisciplinary tumour board review from dozens of referring practices are not what Tebra is typically brought in for.
- What can Ambra Health do that Tebra cannot?
- Ambra Health covers Image exchange, Cloud VNA, Zero footprint viewer, Patient upload portal.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ambra Health: Is Ambra Health still sold under its own name?
Yes. Intelerad still markets Ambra Health as a named product line, but the standalone website redirects to Intelerad, and support and contracting run through Intelerad.
Tebra: How does Tebra's pricing model work?
Pricing is based on the number of clinical providers rather than user seats. Non-clinical staff get unlimited access at no additional cost. Low-volume providers billing under 100 claims monthly receive lower-tier pricing.
SourceAmbra Health: Can Ambra replace our PACS?
For image exchange, archiving and clinical viewing, yes. For high volume diagnostic radiology reading it is generally deployed alongside a departmental PACS rather than instead of one.
Tebra: What are the setup and integration costs beyond the monthly fee?
Electronic Prescribing Controlled Substances (EPCS) setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee. PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus approximately $50 per user per year.
SourceAmbra Health: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by annual study volume, stored capacity and the scope of exchange connections.
Tebra: Are there volume discounts for practices using multiple modules?
Yes, bundled pricing and volume incentives are available for multi-module adoption. Practices can request a personalized quote to see potential savings.
SourceAmbra Health: Does the viewer require software on referring physician machines?
No. The viewer is zero footprint HTML5, which is the main reason referring practices adopt it at all.
Tebra: Does Tebra offer published pricing or is a quote always required?
Tebra does not publish specific monthly costs. Pricing varies depending on the number of providers, platform features needed, and implementation requirements. A personalized quote is required to get pricing.
SourceRelated pages
More on Ambra Health
Other head to heads
- Ambra Health vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Ambra Health vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Ambra Health vs PathAI
- Ambra Health vs Epic Systems
- Ambra Health vs Sectra
- Ambra Health vs Aidoc
- Ambra Health vs Figure 1
- Ambra Health vs GNU Health
- Ambra Health vs OpenMRS
- Ambra Health vs Paige
- Ambra Health vs Bahmni
- Ambra Health vs Doctor on Demand
- Ambra Health vs TheraNest
- Ambra Health vs Updox
- Ambra Health vs UpToDate
- Ambra Health vs Woebot Health
- Ambra Health vs Zanda Health
- Ambra Health vs Athenahealth
- Ambra Health vs Cerner
- Ambra Health vs Amwell
- Ambra Health vs ChiroTouch
- Ambra Health vs Dentrix
- Ambra Health vs RXNT
- Ambra Health vs Kareo
- Ambra Health vs Healthie
- Ambra Health vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Ambra Health vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Ambra Health vs Carestream Dental
- Ambra Health vs athenaOne
- Ambra Health vs Kareo Clinical
- Ambra Health vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Tebra vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Tebra vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Tebra vs PathAI
- Tebra vs Epic Systems
- Tebra vs Sectra
- Tebra vs Aidoc
- Tebra vs Figure 1
- Tebra vs GNU Health
- Tebra vs OpenMRS
- Tebra vs Paige
- Tebra vs Bahmni
- Tebra vs Doctor on Demand
- Tebra vs TheraNest
- Tebra vs Updox
- Tebra vs UpToDate
- Tebra vs Woebot Health
- Tebra vs Zanda Health
- Tebra vs Athenahealth
- Tebra vs Cerner
- Tebra vs Amwell
- Tebra vs ChiroTouch
- Tebra vs Dentrix
- Tebra vs RXNT
- Tebra vs Kareo
- Tebra vs Healthie
- Tebra vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Tebra vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Tebra vs Carestream Dental
- Tebra vs athenaOne
- Tebra vs Kareo Clinical
- Tebra vs Allscripts TouchWorks
