Softwr

Insurance · head to head

FRISS vs InsurancePro

FRISS logo

FRISS

Insurance

Trust automation for insurance

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
I

InsurancePro

Insurance

Agency management system for small US personal lines insurance agencies, now sold by Zywave

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: FRISS no pricing plans, tiers, or costs are published on the website; InsurancePro commercial lines handling is thin next to Applied Epic or AMS360, so an agency that grows into mid-market commercial accounts will usually have to migrate rather than upgrade, and agency management migrations routinely take six months and lose historic activity notes.
  • They diverge on capability: FRISS covers Underwriting risk scoring, InsurancePro covers Policy and client records.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which FRISS and InsurancePro actually diverge.

Attributes where FRISS and InsurancePro differ
AttributeFRISSInsurancePro
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
PlatformsWeb, ApiWeb, Windows, iOS, Android
Founded2006Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in FRISS

  • Underwriting risk scoring
  • Claims fraud detection
  • Network analysis
  • Real-time decisioning
  • Third-party data enrichment
  • Case management
  • Predictive analytics
  • Compliance monitoring

Only in InsurancePro

  • Policy and client records
  • TurboRater integration
  • Commission tracking
  • ACORD forms and certificates
  • Automated task lists
  • Document storage
  • Reporting
  • Download processing

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

FRISS

  • Fraud detectionnot InsurancePro
  • Risk assessmentnot InsurancePro
  • Underwriting automationnot InsurancePro
  • Claims investigationnot InsurancePro
  • Compliancenot InsurancePro

InsurancePro

  • A five person personal lines agency already running TurboRater that wants a management system from the same vendor so quotes flow through without rekeyingnot FRISS
  • An agency leaving paper files and spreadsheets that needs ACORD forms and carrier download without an enterprise implementation projectnot FRISS
  • A start-up agency that cannot justify Applied Epic pricing but needs commission reconciliation from day onenot FRISS
  • An agency owner who wants one supplier relationship covering rating, management and forms rather than stitching three vendors togethernot FRISS

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

FRISS

  • No pricing plans, tiers, or costs are published on the website
  • Requires direct contact through 'Let's talk' call-to-action for pricing inquiries

InsurancePro

  • Commercial lines handling is thin next to Applied Epic or AMS360, so an agency that grows into mid-market commercial accounts will usually have to migrate rather than upgrade, and agency management migrations routinely take six months and lose historic activity notes.
  • TurboRater is a separate purchase, so the integration that is the main reason to buy InsurancePro is only available if you pay for both products, which changes the total cost comparison against systems that include no rater at all.
  • Pricing is not published anywhere, so agencies cannot benchmark before entering a sales conversation and the quote varies with agency size and negotiation.
  • Since the Zywave acquisition the product sits inside a portfolio whose strategic focus is benefits and commercial content, which raises a real question about how much engineering investment a small personal lines AMS will attract over the next few years.
  • Carrier download coverage depends on IVANS connections that the agency must arrange with each carrier, so a new agency can spend weeks chasing download authorisations before the automation the system promises actually works.

Pricing, plan by plan

FRISS

On request
  • Underwriting$undefined/year
    • Risk scoring
    • Application fraud detection
    • Real-time assessment
  • Claims$undefined/year
    • Claims fraud detection
    • Network analysis
    • Investigation prioritization
  • Enterprise Platform$undefined/year
    • All modules
    • Custom models
    • Advanced analytics

InsurancePro

On request
  • InsurancePro$undefined/year
    • Agency management system
    • TurboRater integration sold separately
    • Carrier download

Which should you pick?

Choose FRISS if

  • You need underwriting risk scoring.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want claims fraud detection.
FRISS review

Choose InsurancePro if

  • You need policy and client records.
  • You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
  • You also want turborater integration.
InsurancePro review

Questions people ask

Is FRISS or InsurancePro better?
Neither clearly leads. FRISS starts at On request and InsurancePro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, FRISS or InsurancePro?
FRISS starts at On request and InsurancePro at On request.
Does FRISS or InsurancePro run on more platforms?
FRISS runs on Web, Api. InsurancePro runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
What is FRISS best used for?
FRISS is most often used for fraud detection, risk assessment, underwriting automation, claims investigation. Of those, fraud detection and risk assessment are not what InsurancePro is typically brought in for.
What can FRISS do that InsurancePro cannot?
FRISS covers Underwriting risk scoring, Claims fraud detection, Network analysis, Real-time decisioning. InsurancePro covers Policy and client records, TurboRater integration, Commission tracking, ACORD forms and certificates.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

FRISS: How does FRISS publish pricing information?

FRISS does not publicly disclose pricing on their website. The company directs interested parties to contact their sales team directly for pricing and licensing details.

Source
InsurancePro: Is InsurancePro still sold under its own name?

Yes. It is now a Zywave product, sold on the TurboRater site as InsurancePro, but it retains its own name and its own product page.

FRISS: What pricing model does FRISS use?

FRISS does not specify their pricing model on publicly available pages, requiring direct contact with their sales team to discuss pricing structure and implementation costs.

Source
InsurancePro: Do I need TurboRater to use InsurancePro?

No, but without it you lose the quote-to-management data flow that is the main commercial argument for choosing this system over a rival.

InsurancePro: Can it handle commercial lines?

It can record commercial policies and produce commercial ACORD forms, but agencies writing substantial commercial books generally find the workflow and reporting insufficient.

InsurancePro: What does it cost?

Zywave does not publish pricing. Expect a quote based on agency headcount and modules, with rating licensed separately.

Share

Related pages

More on FRISS

More on InsurancePro

Keep looking

Other head to heads