Software · head to head
Fluentd vs Splunk Enterprise

Splunk Enterprise
Software
Enterprise Search, Monitoring, and Analytics
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Fluentd has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fluentd fluentd needs more than 60 MB of memory at runtime, against roughly 450 KB for Fluent Bit; Splunk Enterprise splunk Platform and Enterprise Security offerings carry no published rate and require contacting sales for a quote
- They diverge on capability: Fluentd covers Log collection, Splunk Enterprise covers Log aggregation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fluentd and Splunk Enterprise actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fluentd | Splunk Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | open-source | usage-based |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2011 | 2003 |
Identical on both: platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fluentd
- Log collection
- Data parsing
- Filtering and buffering
- Event routing
Only in Splunk Enterprise
- Log aggregation
- Real-time monitoring
- Advanced analytics
- Compliance
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fluentd
- Unified log collection and routing from many sources to many destinationsnot Splunk Enterprise
- Parsing and transforming log records before forwardingnot Splunk Enterprise
- Aggregating logs from containers into Elasticsearch, S3 or a SIEMnot Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise
- Indexing and searching machine data and logs at enterprise scalenot Fluentd
- Security information and event management via Enterprise Securitynot Fluentd
- IT service intelligence and infrastructure observabilitynot Fluentd
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fluentd
- Fluentd needs more than 60 MB of memory at runtime, against roughly 450 KB for Fluent Bit
- Fluentd is built as a Ruby gem and depends on other gems, so a Ruby runtime is required
- Its capability comes from over 1,000 external plugins rather than built in functionality, so each added input or output is a separate dependency
- The Fluent Bit documentation states that cloud providers have switched from Fluentd to Fluent Bit for performance and compatibility and calls Fluent Bit the next generation solution
Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Platform and Enterprise Security offerings carry no published rate and require contacting sales for a quote
- Four different pricing models are offered (activity, ingest, workload and entity based) and the applicable one depends on the product purchased
- Published Observability Cloud rates start at $15 per host per month and are billed annually rather than monthly
- Volume discounts are not published and require direct consultation with sales
Pricing, plan by plan
Fluentd
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Data parsing
- Filtering and buffering
Splunk Enterprise
On request- Starter$undefined/month
- Log aggregation
- Real-time monitoring
- Advanced analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Fluentd if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want data parsing.
Choose Splunk Enterprise if
- You need log aggregation.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want real-time monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Fluentd or Splunk Enterprise better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fluentd starts at Free and Splunk Enterprise at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fluentd or Splunk Enterprise?
- Fluentd has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fluentd and On request for Splunk Enterprise.
- Does Fluentd or Splunk Enterprise run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Fluentd for free?
- Yes. Fluentd has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Splunk Enterprise starts at On request.
- What is Fluentd best used for?
- Fluentd is most often used for unified log collection and routing from many sources to many destinations, parsing and transforming log records before forwarding, aggregating logs from containers into elasticsearch, s3 or a siem. Of those, unified log collection and routing from many sources to many destinations and parsing and transforming log records before forwarding are not what Splunk Enterprise is typically brought in for.
- What can Fluentd do that Splunk Enterprise cannot?
- Fluentd covers Log collection, Data parsing, Filtering and buffering, Event routing. Splunk Enterprise covers Log aggregation, Real-time monitoring, Advanced analytics, Compliance. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Splunk Enterprise
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Fluentd vs Elastic Stack
- Fluentd vs New Relic
- Fluentd vs Datadog Logs
- Fluentd vs Coralogix
- Fluentd vs Grafana Loki
- Fluentd vs CloudWatch
- Fluentd vs Dynatrace
- Fluentd vs InfluxDB
- Fluentd vs Airbrake
- Fluentd vs AppDynamics
- Fluentd vs Axiom
- Fluentd vs Azure Monitor
- Fluentd vs Better Stack
- Fluentd vs Bugsnag
- Fluentd vs Dynatrace Logs
- Fluentd vs Elastic
- Fluentd vs Elastic APM
- Fluentd vs Elasticsearch Service
- Splunk Enterprise vs Elastic Stack
- Splunk Enterprise vs New Relic
- Splunk Enterprise vs Datadog Logs
- Splunk Enterprise vs Coralogix
- Splunk Enterprise vs Grafana Loki
- Splunk Enterprise vs CloudWatch
- Splunk Enterprise vs Dynatrace
- Splunk Enterprise vs InfluxDB
- Splunk Enterprise vs Airbrake
- Splunk Enterprise vs AppDynamics
- Splunk Enterprise vs Axiom
- Splunk Enterprise vs Azure Monitor
- Splunk Enterprise vs Better Stack
- Splunk Enterprise vs Bugsnag
- Splunk Enterprise vs Dynatrace Logs
- Splunk Enterprise vs Elastic
- Splunk Enterprise vs Elastic APM
- Splunk Enterprise vs Elasticsearch Service

