Log Management · head to head
Filebeat vs Fluentd
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Filebeat filebeat ships only as part of the Elastic Stack and has no standalone commercial license; using it in production requires deploying Elasticsearch and typically Kibana alongside it.; Fluentd fluentd needs more than 60 MB of memory at runtime, against roughly 450 KB for Fluent Bit
- They diverge on capability: Filebeat covers File tailing, Fluentd covers Log collection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Filebeat and Fluentd actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Log Management), founded (2011).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Filebeat
- File tailing
- Log forwarding
- Event parsing
- Input harvesting
Only in Fluentd
- Log collection
- Data parsing
- Filtering and buffering
- Event routing
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Filebeat
- Log monitoringnot Fluentd
- Application performancenot Fluentd
- Security analyticsnot Fluentd
- Troubleshootingnot Fluentd
Fluentd
- Unified log collection and routing from many sources to many destinationsnot Filebeat
- Parsing and transforming log records before forwardingnot Filebeat
- Aggregating logs from containers into Elasticsearch, S3 or a SIEMnot Filebeat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Filebeat
- Filebeat ships only as part of the Elastic Stack and has no standalone commercial license; using it in production requires deploying Elasticsearch and typically Kibana alongside it.
Fluentd
- Fluentd needs more than 60 MB of memory at runtime, against roughly 450 KB for Fluent Bit
- Fluentd is built as a Ruby gem and depends on other gems, so a Ruby runtime is required
- Its capability comes from over 1,000 external plugins rather than built in functionality, so each added input or output is a separate dependency
- The Fluent Bit documentation states that cloud providers have switched from Fluentd to Fluent Bit for performance and compatibility and calls Fluent Bit the next generation solution
Pricing, plan by plan
Filebeat
Free- FreeFree
- File tailing
- Log forwarding
- Event parsing
Fluentd
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Data parsing
- Filtering and buffering
Which should you pick?
Choose Filebeat if
- You need file tailing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want log forwarding.
Choose Fluentd if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want data parsing.
Questions people ask
- Is Filebeat or Fluentd better?
- Neither clearly leads. Filebeat starts at Free and Fluentd at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Filebeat or Fluentd?
- Filebeat starts at Free and Fluentd at Free.
- Does Filebeat or Fluentd run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Filebeat for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Filebeat best used for?
- Filebeat is most often used for log monitoring, application performance, security analytics, troubleshooting. Of those, log monitoring and application performance are not what Fluentd is typically brought in for.
- What can Filebeat do that Fluentd cannot?
- Filebeat covers File tailing, Log forwarding, Event parsing, Input harvesting. Fluentd covers Log collection, Data parsing, Filtering and buffering, Event routing. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Filebeat vs Elastic Stack
- Filebeat vs New Relic
- Filebeat vs Datadog Logs
- Filebeat vs Coralogix
- Filebeat vs Grafana Loki
- Filebeat vs CloudWatch
- Filebeat vs Dynatrace
- Filebeat vs InfluxDB
- Filebeat vs Airbrake
- Filebeat vs AppDynamics
- Filebeat vs Axiom
- Filebeat vs Azure Monitor
- Filebeat vs Better Stack
- Filebeat vs Bugsnag
- Filebeat vs Dynatrace Logs
- Filebeat vs Elastic
- Filebeat vs Elastic APM
- Filebeat vs Elasticsearch Service
- Fluentd vs Elastic Stack
- Fluentd vs New Relic
- Fluentd vs Datadog Logs
- Fluentd vs Coralogix
- Fluentd vs Grafana Loki
- Fluentd vs CloudWatch
- Fluentd vs Dynatrace
- Fluentd vs InfluxDB
- Fluentd vs Airbrake
- Fluentd vs AppDynamics
- Fluentd vs Axiom
- Fluentd vs Azure Monitor
- Fluentd vs Better Stack
- Fluentd vs Bugsnag
- Fluentd vs Dynatrace Logs
- Fluentd vs Elastic
- Fluentd vs Elastic APM
- Fluentd vs Elasticsearch Service


