Logging · head to head
Fluentd vs Loggly
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fluentd fluentd needs more than 60 MB of memory at runtime, against roughly 450 KB for Fluent Bit; Loggly the free Lite plan caps ingest at 200 MB per day with 7 day retention
- They diverge on capability: Fluentd covers Log collection, Loggly covers Log aggregation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fluentd and Loggly actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fluentd
- Log collection
- Data parsing
- Filtering and buffering
- Event routing
Only in Loggly
- Log aggregation
- Real-time search
- Custom dashboards
- Alert management
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fluentd
- Unified log collection and routing from many sources to many destinationsnot Loggly
- Parsing and transforming log records before forwardingnot Loggly
- Aggregating logs from containers into Elasticsearch, S3 or a SIEMnot Loggly
Loggly
- Cloud-hosted log aggregation for small and mid-sized engineering teamsnot Fluentd
- Alerting on log patterns via email, webhook, PagerDuty or Slacknot Fluentd
- Log analysis alongside SolarWinds infrastructure and application monitoringnot Fluentd
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fluentd
- Fluentd needs more than 60 MB of memory at runtime, against roughly 450 KB for Fluent Bit
- Fluentd is built as a Ruby gem and depends on other gems, so a Ruby runtime is required
- Its capability comes from over 1,000 external plugins rather than built in functionality, so each added input or output is a separate dependency
- The Fluent Bit documentation states that cloud providers have switched from Fluentd to Fluent Bit for performance and compatibility and calls Fluent Bit the next generation solution
Loggly
- The free Lite plan caps ingest at 200 MB per day with 7 day retention
- API access and archiving to Amazon S3 start on the Pro plan at $159 per month billed annually
- Federated identity management is an Enterprise feature, starting at $279 per month billed annually
- The Standard plan at $79 per month is limited to 1 GB per day and 3 source groups
- Maximum retention is 90 days and only on Enterprise; Standard is fixed at 15 days
Pricing, plan by plan
Fluentd
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Data parsing
- Filtering and buffering
Loggly
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Real-time search
- Custom dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Fluentd if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want data parsing.
Choose Loggly if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want real-time search.
Questions people ask
- Is Fluentd or Loggly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fluentd starts at Free and Loggly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fluentd or Loggly?
- Fluentd starts at Free and Loggly at Free.
- Does Fluentd or Loggly run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Fluentd for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Fluentd best used for?
- Fluentd is most often used for unified log collection and routing from many sources to many destinations, parsing and transforming log records before forwarding, aggregating logs from containers into elasticsearch, s3 or a siem. Of those, unified log collection and routing from many sources to many destinations and parsing and transforming log records before forwarding are not what Loggly is typically brought in for.
- What can Fluentd do that Loggly cannot?
- Fluentd covers Log collection, Data parsing, Filtering and buffering, Event routing. Loggly covers Log aggregation, Real-time search, Custom dashboards, Alert management. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fluentd: How much does Fluentd cost?
Fluentd is free and open-source under the Apache 2 License from the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). There are no subscription fees, licensing costs, or commercial pricing tiers.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fluentd vs New Relic
- Fluentd vs Datadog Logs
- Fluentd vs Elastic Stack
- Fluentd vs Coralogix
- Fluentd vs InfluxDB
- Fluentd vs Graylog
- Fluentd vs Traceloop
- Fluentd vs Splunk Enterprise
- Fluentd vs Honeybadger
- Fluentd vs Humio
- Fluentd vs ELK Stack
- Fluentd vs Telegraf
- Fluentd vs Kibana
- Fluentd vs Logstash
- Fluentd vs Elasticsearch Service
- Fluentd vs Filebeat
- Fluentd vs Sumo Logic
- Fluentd vs Dynatrace Logs
- Fluentd vs Splunk Cloud
- Fluentd vs FireHydrant
- Fluentd vs Rootly
- Fluentd vs Axiom
- Fluentd vs Uptime.com
- Fluentd vs Vector
- Fluentd vs Checkly
- Fluentd vs CloudWatch
- Fluentd vs Airbrake
- Fluentd vs Dynatrace
- Loggly vs New Relic
- Loggly vs Datadog Logs
- Loggly vs Elastic Stack
- Loggly vs Coralogix
- Loggly vs InfluxDB
- Loggly vs Graylog
- Loggly vs Traceloop
- Loggly vs Splunk Enterprise
- Loggly vs Honeybadger
- Loggly vs Humio
- Loggly vs ELK Stack
- Loggly vs Telegraf
- Loggly vs Kibana
- Loggly vs Logstash
- Loggly vs Elasticsearch Service
- Loggly vs Filebeat
- Loggly vs Sumo Logic
- Loggly vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loggly vs Splunk Cloud
- Loggly vs FireHydrant
- Loggly vs Rootly
- Loggly vs Axiom
- Loggly vs Uptime.com
- Loggly vs Vector
- Loggly vs Checkly
- Loggly vs CloudWatch
- Loggly vs Airbrake
- Loggly vs Dynatrace


