Technology · head to head
Close vs Finxact

Close
Technology
The inside sales CRM of choice for startups & SMBs
- From
- $9/month
- Rated
- -

Finxact
Technology
Cloud native core banking, sold as Finxact from Fiserv since the 2022 acquisition
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription); Finxact fiserv sells several core platforms, so a buyer should demand written investment and support commitments for Finxact specifically rather than trusting that the surviving brand implies a protected roadmap.
- They diverge on capability: Close covers Built-in calling, Finxact covers Cloud native core.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Close and Finxact actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Technology).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Reporting
- Mobile app
Only in Finxact
- Cloud native core
- Real time posting
- Configurable product definitions
- Fiserv ecosystem access
- Embedded banking support
- Open API model
- Multi tenant deployment
- Regulatory reporting hooks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Close
- Inside salesnot Finxact
- Outbound salesnot Finxact
- Lead managementnot Finxact
- Sales engagementnot Finxact
- Pipeline trackingnot Finxact
Finxact
- A United States regional bank replacing a legacy core but unwilling to take supplier viability risk on an independent challengernot Close
- A community bank launching an embedded banking or sponsor bank programme on modern railsnot Close
- An institution already running Fiserv card and payment services that wants the core on the same vendor relationshipnot Close
- A bank standing up a new digital brand on a clean core while leaving the existing back book in placenot Close
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
Finxact
- Fiserv sells several core platforms, so a buyer should demand written investment and support commitments for Finxact specifically rather than trusting that the surviving brand implies a protected roadmap.
- Core migration is a multi year programme where the licence is a small share of total cost against integration, data migration and parallel running.
- Buying the core from Fiserv strengthens a relationship that already covers cards and payments, which weakens your negotiating position across the whole estate at renewal.
- It is a United States product with United States regulatory and product assumptions, so international banks get little from it.
- Being part of a very large vendor changes the service experience: the responsiveness that made Finxact attractive as a startup is not guaranteed inside a company of Fiserv's scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
Finxact
On request- Finxact from Fiserv$undefined/year
- Quoted per institution, commonly on accounts or asset size
- Implementation and integration costs typically exceed the licence fee
- Bundled commercially with other Fiserv services in many deals
Which should you pick?
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Choose Finxact if
- You need cloud native core.
- You work on Web, API, Cloud.
- You also want real time posting.
Questions people ask
- Is Close or Finxact better?
- Neither clearly leads. Close starts at $9/month and Finxact at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Close or Finxact?
- Close starts at $9/month and Finxact at On request.
- Does Close or Finxact run on more platforms?
- Close runs on Web, iOS, Android. Finxact runs on Web, API, Cloud.
- What is Close best used for?
- Close is most often used for inside sales, outbound sales, lead management, sales engagement. Of those, inside sales and outbound sales are not what Finxact is typically brought in for.
- What can Close do that Finxact cannot?
- Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management. Finxact covers Cloud native core, Real time posting, Configurable product definitions, Fiserv ecosystem access.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Close: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourceFinxact: Is Finxact still sold under its own name?
Yes. Fiserv acquired it in 2022 and continues to market it as Finxact from Fiserv, winning named core deals with it.
Close: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourceFinxact: Is it genuinely cloud native?
Yes, API first with real time posting on public cloud, rather than a hosted version of a legacy core.
Close: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourceFinxact: How long is a migration?
Plan in years. Even a focused deployment is a multi year programme once integration and data migration are counted.
Close: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceClose: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceClose: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Close vs Attio
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs Asana
- Close vs Docker
- Close vs Mozilla Firefox
- Close vs Userpilot
- Close vs Personetics
- Close vs Superhuman
- Close vs ClickUp
- Close vs Linear
- Close vs Notion
- Close vs Amplitude
- Close vs Jenkins
- Close vs Miro
- Close vs Plane
- Close vs Postman
- Close vs Raycast
- Close vs Zeta
- Close vs Thought Machine
- Close vs Alkami
- Close vs Envoy
- Close vs etcd
- Close vs Datadog
- Close vs Safari
- Close vs Dashlane
- Close vs Heap
- Close vs Lovable
- Close vs Lucidchart
- Close vs MongoDB
- Close vs Nagios XI
- Close vs Postgres
- Close vs MongoDB Atlas
- Finxact vs Attio
- Finxact vs Drift
- Finxact vs Asana
- Finxact vs Docker
- Finxact vs Mozilla Firefox
- Finxact vs Userpilot
- Finxact vs Personetics
- Finxact vs Superhuman
- Finxact vs ClickUp
- Finxact vs Linear
- Finxact vs Notion
- Finxact vs Amplitude
- Finxact vs Jenkins
- Finxact vs Miro
- Finxact vs Plane
- Finxact vs Postman
- Finxact vs Raycast
- Finxact vs Zeta
- Finxact vs Thought Machine
- Finxact vs Alkami
- Finxact vs Envoy
- Finxact vs etcd
- Finxact vs Datadog
- Finxact vs Safari
- Finxact vs Dashlane
- Finxact vs Heap
- Finxact vs Lovable
- Finxact vs Lucidchart
- Finxact vs MongoDB
- Finxact vs Nagios XI
- Finxact vs Postgres
- Finxact vs MongoDB Atlas
