Technology · head to head
Close vs Postgres

Close
Technology
The inside sales CRM of choice for startups & SMBs
- From
- $9/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Postgres has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription); Postgres each major version is supported for only 5 years after its initial release, after which it is end-of-life
- They diverge on capability: Close covers Built-in calling, Postgres covers ACID compliance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Close and Postgres actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Technology).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Reporting
- Mobile app
Only in Postgres
- ACID compliance
- Complex queries
- Foreign keys
- Triggers
- Views
- Stored procedures
- JSON/JSONB support
- Full-text search
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Close
- Inside salesnot Postgres
- Outbound salesnot Postgres
- Lead managementnot Postgres
- Sales engagementnot Postgres
- Pipeline trackingnot Postgres
Postgres
- Running a general purpose relational database for applicationsnot Close
- Self-hosting an open source SQL database with no licence feenot Close
- Workloads needing extensions, JSON and full text search in one enginenot Close
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
Postgres
- Each major version is supported for only 5 years after its initial release, after which it is end-of-life
- Major version upgrades break on-disk compatibility and require a full dump and reload or the pg_upgrade tool
- New major versions ship about once a year, so staying supported means a disruptive upgrade cycle
- Minor releases contain only frequently-encountered bug fixes, low-risk fixes, security issues and data corruption fixes, so feature gaps are not addressed within a major version
- There is no vendor SLA; commercial support must be bought separately from third party professional services listed by the project
Pricing, plan by plan
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
Postgres
Free- Community EditionFree
- Full database features
- No limitations
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Choose Postgres if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker.
- You also want complex queries.
Questions people ask
- Is Close or Postgres better?
- Neither clearly leads. Close starts at $9/month and Postgres at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Close or Postgres?
- Postgres has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $9/month for Close and Free for Postgres.
- Does Close or Postgres run on more platforms?
- Close runs on Web, iOS, Android. Postgres runs on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker.
- Can I use Postgres for free?
- Yes. Postgres has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Close starts at $9/month.
- What is Close best used for?
- Close is most often used for inside sales, outbound sales, lead management, sales engagement. Of those, inside sales and outbound sales are not what Postgres is typically brought in for.
- What can Close do that Postgres cannot?
- Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management. Postgres covers ACID compliance, Complex queries, Foreign keys, Triggers.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Close: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourcePostgres: How much does PostgreSQL cost to use?
PostgreSQL is completely free to download, install, and use. No licensing fees, subscription costs, or per-seat charges apply. The database is open source under the PostgreSQL License. Source: https://www.postgresql.org
SourceClose: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourcePostgres: Are there commercial PostgreSQL support options available?
Official PostgreSQL (the project) is free. Commercial PostgreSQL services such as hosting, professional support, training, and managed database services are offered by third-party vendors, not the PostgreSQL project itself. Source: https://www.postgresql.org
SourceClose: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourcePostgres: Do I need a license to use PostgreSQL commercially?
No. PostgreSQL is open source under the PostgreSQL License, which permits free commercial use without royalties, licensing fees, or support obligations. Source: https://www.postgresql.org
SourceClose: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceClose: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceClose: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Close vs Attio
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs Asana
- Close vs Docker
- Close vs Mozilla Firefox
- Close vs Userpilot
- Close vs Personetics
- Close vs Superhuman
- Close vs ClickUp
- Close vs Linear
- Close vs Notion
- Close vs Amplitude
- Close vs Jenkins
- Close vs Miro
- Close vs Plane
- Close vs Postman
- Close vs Raycast
- Close vs Figma
- Close vs Supabase
- Close vs Redis
- Close vs Aha!
- Close vs Eclipse
- Close vs Excalidraw
- Close vs MongoDB
- Close vs Okta
- Close vs Coda
- Close vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Close vs LogRocket
- Close vs Neovim
- Postgres vs Attio
- Postgres vs Drift
- Postgres vs Asana
- Postgres vs Docker
- Postgres vs Mozilla Firefox
- Postgres vs Userpilot
- Postgres vs Personetics
- Postgres vs Superhuman
- Postgres vs ClickUp
- Postgres vs Linear
- Postgres vs Notion
- Postgres vs Amplitude
- Postgres vs Jenkins
- Postgres vs Miro
- Postgres vs Plane
- Postgres vs Postman
- Postgres vs Raycast
- Postgres vs Figma
- Postgres vs Supabase
- Postgres vs Redis
- Postgres vs Aha!
- Postgres vs Eclipse
- Postgres vs Excalidraw
- Postgres vs MongoDB
- Postgres vs Okta
- Postgres vs Coda
- Postgres vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Postgres vs LogRocket
- Postgres vs Neovim

