Maps · head to head
deck.gl vs Felt

deck.gl
Maps
WebGL-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, developed by
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: deck.gl open source framework with no commercial support tier available; support relies on community and GitHub issues; Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- They diverge on capability: deck.gl covers Core Functionality, Felt covers Real-time collaboration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which deck.gl and Felt actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in deck.gl
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
deck.gl
- GPU-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browsernot Felt
- Composing map overlays from reusable layersnot Felt
- Adding data layers on top of Google Maps or Mapbox basemapsnot Felt
- High-precision plotting using 64-bit GPU computationnot Felt
- Use from React or plain JavaScriptnot Felt
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot deck.gl
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot deck.gl
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot deck.gl
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot deck.gl
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
deck.gl
- Open source framework with no commercial support tier available; support relies on community and GitHub issues
- Maintained by community contributors (vis.gl contributors), not by a dedicated company support team
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Pricing, plan by plan
deck.gl
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the deck.gl review.
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Which should you pick?
Choose deck.gl if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Questions people ask
- Is deck.gl or Felt better?
- Neither clearly leads. deck.gl starts at Free and Felt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, deck.gl or Felt?
- deck.gl starts at Free and Felt at Free.
- Does deck.gl or Felt run on more platforms?
- deck.gl runs on Web. Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use deck.gl for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is deck.gl best used for?
- deck.gl is most often used for gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser, composing map overlays from reusable layers, adding data layers on top of google maps or mapbox basemaps, high-precision plotting using 64-bit gpu computation. Of those, gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser and composing map overlays from reusable layers are not what Felt is typically brought in for.
- What can deck.gl do that Felt cannot?
- deck.gl covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
deck.gl: How much does deck.gl cost?
deck.gl is completely free to use. It is an open source framework maintained by the OpenJS Foundation and community contributors. The project is available on GitHub for anyone to use, modify, and contribute to without cost.
SourceFelt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
deck.gl: Is deck.gl open source?
Yes, deck.gl is open source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation and vis.gl contributors. The source code is publicly available, and the framework can be used freely in any project.
SourceFelt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
Felt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Felt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- deck.gl vs Lonboard
- deck.gl vs Apple Maps
- deck.gl vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- deck.gl vs Mapbox
- deck.gl vs Google Maps Platform
- deck.gl vs HERE Technologies
- deck.gl vs Fused
- deck.gl vs Kepler.gl
- deck.gl vs Potree
- deck.gl vs QGIS
- deck.gl vs Esri ArcGIS
- deck.gl vs Cesium ion
- deck.gl vs Trailforks
- deck.gl vs AllTrails
- deck.gl vs Bing Maps
- deck.gl vs Citymapper
- deck.gl vs ArcGIS Survey123
- deck.gl vs CARTO
- deck.gl vs Atlas.co
- deck.gl vs Global Mapper
- deck.gl vs GRASS GIS
- deck.gl vs onX Maps
- deck.gl vs Ride with GPS
- deck.gl vs SW Maps
- deck.gl vs TomTom Developer Portal
- deck.gl vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Lonboard
- Felt vs Apple Maps
- Felt vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Felt vs Mapbox
- Felt vs Google Maps Platform
- Felt vs HERE Technologies
- Felt vs Fused
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Potree
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
