Software · head to head
GraphHopper vs Leaflet

GraphHopper
Software
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Leaflet
Software
Leading open-source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps, used by millions of developers worldwide
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Leaflet has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; Leaflet 2D only with no support for 3D features, tilt, or rotation
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and Leaflet actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | Leaflet |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that Leaflet does not also cover.
Only in Leaflet
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Leaflet
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Leaflet
Leaflet
- Embedding interactive maps in a web pagenot GraphHopper
- Mobile-friendly map interfaces across desktop and mobile browsersnot GraphHopper
- Mapping where bundle size matters, at roughly 42 KB of JavaScriptnot GraphHopper
- Extending a basic map with plugins rather than adopting a full platformnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Leaflet
- 2D only with no support for 3D features, tilt, or rotation
- Performance degrades when rendering large datasets of complex vector geometries without optimization
- Limited dynamic styling support; style is fixed on the server when using raster tiles
- Lacks native support for WMS features; requires plugins like Leaflet.WMS and complex feature identification is cumbersome
- Requires external tile service for map imagery; does not provide map tiles natively
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Leaflet
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Leaflet review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from Leaflet on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or Leaflet better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and Leaflet at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or Leaflet?
- Leaflet has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GraphHopper and Free for Leaflet.
- Does GraphHopper or Leaflet run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Leaflet for free?
- Yes. Leaflet has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GraphHopper starts at On request.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what Leaflet is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Leaflet: Is Leaflet free and open source?
Yes. Leaflet is open-source JavaScript library licensed for free use. Over 400 plugins add capabilities like marker clustering, heatmaps, drawing tools, geocoding, and routing.
SourceLeaflet: How do I include Leaflet in my project via CDN?
Leaflet is available on multiple free CDNs including unpkg, cdnjs, and jsDelivr. Include the CSS stylesheet from https://unpkg.com/leaflet@1.9.4/dist/leaflet.css and JavaScript from https://unpkg.com/leaflet@1.9.4/dist/leaflet.js in your HTML head.
SourceLeaflet: What mapping services does Leaflet support?
Leaflet integrates seamlessly with various mapping services including OpenStreetMap, Google Maps, Bing, and other custom tile providers, allowing developers to choose the best base layer.
SourceLeaflet: What is the file size of Leaflet?
Leaflet weighs about 42 KB of JavaScript.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Samsara
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Geotab
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Verizon Connect
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
- Leaflet vs Mapbox
- Leaflet vs Google Maps Platform
- Leaflet vs HERE Technologies
- Leaflet vs Apple Maps
- Leaflet vs Esri ArcGIS
- Leaflet vs CesiumJS
- Leaflet vs Samsara
- Leaflet vs Bing Maps
- Leaflet vs CARTO
- Leaflet vs Geotab
- Leaflet vs HERE WeGo
- Leaflet vs IndoorAtlas
- Leaflet vs Mappedin
- Leaflet vs Verizon Connect
- Leaflet vs AllTrails
- Leaflet vs Citymapper
- Leaflet vs deck.gl
