Maritime · head to head
exactEarth vs NAPA Fleet Intelligence

NAPA Fleet Intelligence
Maritime
Vessel performance, emissions compliance and voyage optimisation built on NAPA hydrodynamic ship models
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: exactEarth company acquired and redirected; no pricing published on successor site; NAPA Fleet Intelligence model-derived performance from AIS and noon reports is an estimate, so it supports fleet screening and dispute evidence better than fine-grained optimisation of a single ship.
- They diverge on capability: exactEarth covers Satellite AIS data, NAPA Fleet Intelligence covers NAPA Performance Model.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which exactEarth and NAPA Fleet Intelligence actually diverge.
| Attribute | exactEarth | NAPA Fleet Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1000/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Api, Web | Web, Cloud |
| Founded | 2009 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maritime).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in exactEarth
- Satellite AIS data
- Global vessel tracking
- Historical data archive
- Anomaly detection
- API
- Data feeds
- GIS platforms
- Api support
Only in NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- NAPA Performance Model
- AIS-based analysis
- Voyage optimisation
- Emissions reporting
- Hull and propeller performance
- Fleet benchmarking
- Onboard integration
- Passenger ship modules
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
exactEarth
No use cases recorded yet. See the exactEarth review.
NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- A charterer assessing hull performance of vessels it does not own using AIS data alonenot exactEarth
- An owner needing auditable CII and EU ETS numbers rather than spreadsheet estimatesnot exactEarth
- A technical manager deciding whether hull cleaning this quarter pays for itself in fuelnot exactEarth
- A fleet arguing a charter party speed and consumption claim and needing model-backed evidencenot exactEarth
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
exactEarth
- Company acquired and redirected; no pricing published on successor site
NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Model-derived performance from AIS and noon reports is an estimate, so it supports fleet screening and dispute evidence better than fine-grained optimisation of a single ship.
- Pricing is per vessel and unpublished, and modular scoping means the quote you compare against a competitor may not cover the same functions.
- Building the vessel-specific performance model requires hull form and design data that owners of older or second-hand tonnage often do not have, which turns onboarding into a data hunt.
- It is a monitoring and advisory layer, not a system of record; you still run a separate planned maintenance system, a chartering system and a crewing system.
- NAPA is strongest in the design and stability world, and its operational reference base, while real, is smaller than the pure voyage-optimisation specialists, so integration breadth with commercial shipping software is narrower.
Pricing, plan by plan
exactEarth
$1000/month- Enterprise$5000/month
- Global AIS data
- Historical archive
- Custom analytics
NAPA Fleet Intelligence
On request- NAPA Fleet Intelligence$undefined/year
- Licensed per vessel with modular scope
- Fleet agreements and multi-year terms negotiated
- Vessel model creation may be a one-off setup charge
Which should you pick?
Choose exactEarth if
- You need satellite ais data.
- You work on Api, Web.
- You also want global vessel tracking.
Choose NAPA Fleet Intelligence if
- You need napa performance model.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want ais-based analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is exactEarth or NAPA Fleet Intelligence better?
- Neither clearly leads. exactEarth starts at $1000/month and NAPA Fleet Intelligence at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, exactEarth or NAPA Fleet Intelligence?
- exactEarth starts at $1000/month and NAPA Fleet Intelligence at On request.
- Does exactEarth or NAPA Fleet Intelligence run on more platforms?
- exactEarth runs on Api, Web. NAPA Fleet Intelligence runs on Web, Cloud.
- What can exactEarth do that NAPA Fleet Intelligence cannot?
- exactEarth covers Satellite AIS data, Global vessel tracking, Historical data archive, Anomaly detection. NAPA Fleet Intelligence covers NAPA Performance Model, AIS-based analysis, Voyage optimisation, Emissions reporting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
exactEarth: How much does ExactEarth cost?
ExactEarth has been acquired and redirected to Kpler's maritime product. Kpler does not publish pricing information online and requires customers to request a demo to receive pricing quotes.
SourceNAPA Fleet Intelligence: Do we need onboard sensors?
No. NAPA can produce performance analysis from AIS and noon reports using its hydrodynamic model, though instrumented data improves accuracy.
NAPA Fleet Intelligence: Does it handle EU ETS and CII?
Yes, emissions calculation and regulatory reporting for EU MRV, IMO DCS, CII and EU ETS are covered.
NAPA Fleet Intelligence: Is it the same NAPA used for ship design?
Yes, same company, and Fleet Intelligence reuses the hydrodynamic modelling from that business.
NAPA Fleet Intelligence: Is pricing published?
No. It is licensed per vessel by module, quoted per fleet.
Related pages
More on NAPA Fleet Intelligence
Other head to heads
- exactEarth vs MarineTraffic
- exactEarth vs FleetMon
- exactEarth vs ChartCo
- exactEarth vs Kongsberg Maritime
- exactEarth vs Sea Machines
- exactEarth vs Pole Star Global
- exactEarth vs CargoSmart
- exactEarth vs VesselFinder
- exactEarth vs project44
- exactEarth vs Flexport
- exactEarth vs Kpler
- exactEarth vs Wartsila Voyage
- exactEarth vs Vizion
- exactEarth vs Vortexa
- exactEarth vs Voyager Worldwide
- exactEarth vs ZeroNorth
- exactEarth vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- exactEarth vs DNV Navigator Port
- exactEarth vs Veson Nautical
- exactEarth vs Bearing AI
- exactEarth vs Kongsberg Vessel Insight
- exactEarth vs Helm Operations
- exactEarth vs Danaos
- exactEarth vs SpeedyDock
- exactEarth vs Nautilus Labs
- exactEarth vs Kaleris
- exactEarth vs Linerlytica
- exactEarth vs MDS Transmodal
- exactEarth vs ORBCOMM
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs MarineTraffic
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs FleetMon
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs ChartCo
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kongsberg Maritime
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Sea Machines
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Pole Star Global
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs CargoSmart
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs VesselFinder
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs project44
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Flexport
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kpler
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Wartsila Voyage
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Vizion
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Vortexa
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Voyager Worldwide
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs ZeroNorth
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs DNV Navigator Port
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Veson Nautical
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Bearing AI
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kongsberg Vessel Insight
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Helm Operations
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Danaos
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs SpeedyDock
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Nautilus Labs
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kaleris
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Linerlytica
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs MDS Transmodal
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs ORBCOMM

