Maritime · head to head
exactEarth vs ORBCOMM
The short version
- Each has a real cost: exactEarth company acquired and redirected; no pricing published on successor site; ORBCOMM satellite latency of approximately 600 milliseconds limits real-time applications
- They diverge on capability: exactEarth covers Satellite AIS data, ORBCOMM covers Satellite tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which exactEarth and ORBCOMM actually diverge.
| Attribute | exactEarth | ORBCOMM |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1000/month | $25/month |
| Platforms | Api, Web | Satellite, Web |
| Founded | 2009 | 1995 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maritime).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in exactEarth
- Satellite AIS data
- Global vessel tracking
- Historical data archive
- Anomaly detection
- API
- Data feeds
- GIS platforms
Only in ORBCOMM
- Satellite tracking
- Container monitoring
- Cold chain monitoring
- Fleet telematics
- TMS systems
- ERP platforms
- Warehouse management
- Mobile support
Both cover
- Api support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
exactEarth
No use cases recorded yet. See the exactEarth review.
ORBCOMM
- Tracking shipping container temperatures for refrigerated cargonot exactEarth
- Detecting vessel AIS spoofing to identify anomalous maritime activitynot exactEarth
- Monitoring fuel consumption patterns across fleet operationsnot exactEarth
- Screening shipments for sanctions compliance violationsnot exactEarth
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
exactEarth
- Company acquired and redirected; no pricing published on successor site
ORBCOMM
- Satellite latency of approximately 600 milliseconds limits real-time applications
- Higher cost per message compared to terrestrial cellular IoT solutions
- Coverage remains near-global rather than fully global in all remote regions
Pricing, plan by plan
exactEarth
$1000/month- Enterprise$5000/month
- Global AIS data
- Historical archive
- Custom analytics
ORBCOMM
$25/month- Fleet Manager$99/month
- Real-time tracking
- Geofencing
- Reporting
Which should you pick?
Choose exactEarth if
- You need satellite ais data.
- You work on Api, Web.
- You also want global vessel tracking.
Choose ORBCOMM if
- You need satellite tracking.
- You work on Satellite, Web.
- You also want container monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is exactEarth or ORBCOMM better?
- Neither clearly leads. exactEarth starts at $1000/month and ORBCOMM at $25/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, exactEarth or ORBCOMM?
- exactEarth starts at $1000/month and ORBCOMM at $25/month.
- Does exactEarth or ORBCOMM run on more platforms?
- exactEarth runs on Api, Web. ORBCOMM runs on Satellite, Web.
- What can exactEarth do that ORBCOMM cannot?
- exactEarth covers Satellite AIS data, Global vessel tracking, Historical data archive, Anomaly detection. ORBCOMM covers Satellite tracking, Container monitoring, Cold chain monitoring, Fleet telematics. Both handle Api support, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
exactEarth: How much does ExactEarth cost?
ExactEarth has been acquired and redirected to Kpler's maritime product. Kpler does not publish pricing information online and requires customers to request a demo to receive pricing quotes.
SourceORBCOMM: What is ORBCOMM's satellite coverage?
ORBCOMM's OGx service provides nearly global coverage across over 160 countries using a constellation of low Earth orbit satellites for two-way messaging and IoT data services.
SourceORBCOMM: How does satellite IoT compare to cellular connectivity?
ORBCOMM satellite offers immunity from cellular blind spots, network outages, congestion, and weather-related disruptions. However, satellite connectivity introduces approximately 600 milliseconds of round-trip latency.
SourceORBCOMM: What can ORBCOMM monitor in containers?
ORBCOMM's CT 1010 device provides sensor-based monitoring for container fire detection, unauthorized access alerts, damage detection, and asset visibility, with real-time satellite-based tracking.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- exactEarth vs MarineTraffic
- exactEarth vs FleetMon
- exactEarth vs ChartCo
- exactEarth vs Kongsberg Maritime
- exactEarth vs Sea Machines
- exactEarth vs Pole Star Global
- exactEarth vs CargoSmart
- exactEarth vs VesselFinder
- exactEarth vs project44
- exactEarth vs Flexport
- exactEarth vs Kpler
- exactEarth vs Wartsila Voyage
- exactEarth vs Vizion
- exactEarth vs Vortexa
- exactEarth vs Voyager Worldwide
- exactEarth vs ZeroNorth
- exactEarth vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- exactEarth vs Portcast
- exactEarth vs Terminal49
- exactEarth vs Linerlytica
- exactEarth vs MDS Transmodal
- exactEarth vs DNV Maritime
- exactEarth vs ShipNet
- exactEarth vs Alphaliner
- exactEarth vs Clarksons
- exactEarth vs Q88
- exactEarth vs Sea-Intelligence
- exactEarth vs Shone
- exactEarth vs Signal Ocean Platform
- exactEarth vs StormGlass
- ORBCOMM vs MarineTraffic
- ORBCOMM vs FleetMon
- ORBCOMM vs ChartCo
- ORBCOMM vs Kongsberg Maritime
- ORBCOMM vs Sea Machines
- ORBCOMM vs Pole Star Global
- ORBCOMM vs CargoSmart
- ORBCOMM vs VesselFinder
- ORBCOMM vs project44
- ORBCOMM vs Flexport
- ORBCOMM vs Kpler
- ORBCOMM vs Wartsila Voyage
- ORBCOMM vs Vizion
- ORBCOMM vs Vortexa
- ORBCOMM vs Voyager Worldwide
- ORBCOMM vs ZeroNorth
- ORBCOMM vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- ORBCOMM vs Portcast
- ORBCOMM vs Terminal49
- ORBCOMM vs Linerlytica
- ORBCOMM vs MDS Transmodal
- ORBCOMM vs DNV Maritime
- ORBCOMM vs ShipNet
- ORBCOMM vs Alphaliner
- ORBCOMM vs Clarksons
- ORBCOMM vs Q88
- ORBCOMM vs Sea-Intelligence
- ORBCOMM vs Shone
- ORBCOMM vs Signal Ocean Platform
- ORBCOMM vs StormGlass


