Developer Tools · head to head
Earthly vs Shufti Pro

Shufti Pro
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening at the low cost end of the market
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Earthly has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Earthly pricing model not published; requires sales contact; Shufti Pro rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- They diverge on capability: Earthly covers Policy as code, Shufti Pro covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Earthly and Shufti Pro actually diverge.
| Attribute | Earthly | Shufti Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | No pricing published on website | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, CLI | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2020 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Earthly
- Policy as code
- Multi-stage enforcement
- AI agent governance
- Repository-wide policies
- Incident response automation
- Compliance management
- Earthfiles build tool
- Satellites
Only in Shufti Pro
- Document verification
- Facial biometrics
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- Address verification
- Age verification
- Pay as you go option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Earthly
- Enforcing engineering standards across AI and human developersnot Shufti Pro
- Automating incident response procedures across all repositoriesnot Shufti Pro
- Embedding compliance requirements into development workflowsnot Shufti Pro
- Standardizing build processes with Earthfilesnot Shufti Pro
Shufti Pro
- A crypto exchange onboarding users in markets where premium vendors have poor document coveragenot Earthly
- A gambling operator needing age assurance at high volume where per-check cost dominates the unit economicsnot Earthly
- A gig economy platform verifying couriers whose documents are photographed on low end phonesnot Earthly
- A startup that needs verification without signing an annual volume commitment before it knows its volumenot Earthly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Earthly
- Pricing model not published; requires sales contact
- Earthly Lunar is a recent launch (2025) with limited track record
- Primarily GitHub-focused; limited integration with other platforms
- No public documentation on pricing or feature tiers
Shufti Pro
- Rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- Accuracy on difficult document types trails the premium vendors, and the saving per check is often consumed by the manual review headcount handling the additional referrals.
- The enterprise assurance profile is thinner than that of larger competitors, so regulated bank procurement teams frequently rule it out at the vendor risk stage rather than on capability.
- Support responsiveness scales with contract size, and pay as you go customers have limited recourse when a document type suddenly starts failing in one market.
- Country coverage is broad but uneven in depth, meaning the same product can perform very differently across two markets you are launching in simultaneously.
Pricing, plan by plan
Earthly
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Earthly review.
Shufti Pro
On request- Pay as you go$undefined/month
- Consumption billing with no annual commitment
- Rate quoted by sales, not published
- Resubmission sessions stated as not billable
- Monthly commitment$undefined/month
- Lower per-verification rate against a volume commitment
- AML screening and KYB priced as add-ons
- Free trial available before contracting
Which should you pick?
Choose Earthly if
- You need policy as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want multi-stage enforcement.
Choose Shufti Pro if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want facial biometrics.
Questions people ask
- Is Earthly or Shufti Pro better?
- Neither clearly leads. Earthly starts at Free and Shufti Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Earthly or Shufti Pro?
- Earthly has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Earthly and On request for Shufti Pro.
- Does Earthly or Shufti Pro run on more platforms?
- Earthly runs on Web, CLI. Shufti Pro runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Earthly for free?
- Yes. Earthly has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Shufti Pro starts at On request.
- What is Earthly best used for?
- Earthly is most often used for enforcing engineering standards across ai and human developers, automating incident response procedures across all repositories, embedding compliance requirements into development workflows, standardizing build processes with earthfiles. Of those, enforcing engineering standards across ai and human developers and automating incident response procedures across all repositories are not what Shufti Pro is typically brought in for.
- What can Earthly do that Shufti Pro cannot?
- Earthly covers Policy as code, Multi-stage enforcement, AI agent governance, Repository-wide policies. Shufti Pro covers Document verification, Facial biometrics, AML screening, KYB verification.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Earthly: What is the difference between Earthfiles and Earthly Lunar?
Earthfiles is an open-source build tool that reached 12,000 GitHub stars and is used by companies like NVIDIA, Intel, and Databricks. Earthly Lunar is a separate governance platform launched in 2025 for enforcing standards across development workflows.
SourceShufti Pro: Are failed attempts charged?
Shufti states that resubmission sessions are not charged and that billing follows successful verification attempts. Get that written into the contract, because it materially changes total cost.
Earthly: How does Earthly Lunar enforce standards?
Lunar converts engineering standards, compliance requirements, and processes documented in AGENTS.md files, wikis, and incident postmortems into enforceable guardrails that apply consistently across repositories and development stages.
SourceShufti Pro: Is there a published price?
No. Plan structures are published but rates are quoted. Third party estimates put effective cost well below premium vendors.
Earthly: What is the pricing for Earthly Lunar?
Pricing is not published on the website. Interested customers should contact Earthly's sales team for current pricing and feature tiers.
SourceShufti Pro: Can we start without a commitment?
Yes. A pay as you go option exists, which is unusual in this category and useful for early stage volume.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Earthly vs Spacelift
- Earthly vs Dagger
- Earthly vs Nixpacks
- Earthly vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Earthly vs OpsLevel
- Earthly vs Namespace
- Earthly vs Depot
- Earthly vs Blacksmith
- Earthly vs WarpBuild
- Earthly vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Earthly vs Garden
- Earthly vs Nx Cloud
- Earthly vs Cody
- Earthly vs ConfigCat
- Earthly vs Cortex
- Earthly vs Deep Code
- Earthly vs Deno
- Earthly vs Sumsub
- Earthly vs Jumio
- Earthly vs Veriff
- Earthly vs iDenfy
- Earthly vs Socure
- Earthly vs IDnow
- Earthly vs Trulioo
- Earthly vs Yoti
- Earthly vs Quantexa
- Earthly vs Fenergo
- Earthly vs NICE Actimize
- Earthly vs Signicat
- Earthly vs Keeper Password Manager
- Earthly vs Keygen
- Earthly vs KnowBe4
- Earthly vs Legit Security
- Earthly vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Earthly vs Metasploit
- Shufti Pro vs Spacelift
- Shufti Pro vs Dagger
- Shufti Pro vs Nixpacks
- Shufti Pro vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Shufti Pro vs OpsLevel
- Shufti Pro vs Namespace
- Shufti Pro vs Depot
- Shufti Pro vs Blacksmith
- Shufti Pro vs WarpBuild
- Shufti Pro vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Shufti Pro vs Garden
- Shufti Pro vs Nx Cloud
- Shufti Pro vs Cody
- Shufti Pro vs ConfigCat
- Shufti Pro vs Cortex
- Shufti Pro vs Deep Code
- Shufti Pro vs Deno
- Shufti Pro vs Sumsub
- Shufti Pro vs Jumio
- Shufti Pro vs Veriff
- Shufti Pro vs iDenfy
- Shufti Pro vs Socure
- Shufti Pro vs IDnow
- Shufti Pro vs Trulioo
- Shufti Pro vs Yoti
- Shufti Pro vs Quantexa
- Shufti Pro vs Fenergo
- Shufti Pro vs NICE Actimize
- Shufti Pro vs Signicat
- Shufti Pro vs Keeper Password Manager
- Shufti Pro vs Keygen
- Shufti Pro vs KnowBe4
- Shufti Pro vs Legit Security
- Shufti Pro vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Shufti Pro vs Metasploit

