Developer Tools · head to head
Earthly vs WarpBuild

WarpBuild
Developer Tools
2x faster, 50% cheaper GitHub Actions runners
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Earthly has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Earthly pricing model not published; requires sales contact; WarpBuild per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
- They diverge on capability: Earthly covers Policy as code, WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Earthly and WarpBuild actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Earthly
- Policy as code
- Multi-stage enforcement
- AI agent governance
- Repository-wide policies
- Incident response automation
- Compliance management
- Earthfiles build tool
- Satellites
Only in WarpBuild
- Optimized runner infrastructure
- Intelligent caching
- Incremental builds
- Multi-architecture support
- Unlimited concurrency
- Autoscaling
- BYOC support
- Docker builders
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Earthly
- Enforcing engineering standards across AI and human developersnot WarpBuild
- Automating incident response procedures across all repositoriesnot WarpBuild
- Embedding compliance requirements into development workflowsnot WarpBuild
- Standardizing build processes with Earthfilesnot WarpBuild
WarpBuild
- Accelerating CI builds for teams with high test volumesnot Earthly
- Running tests generated by AI coding assistants efficientlynot Earthly
- Reducing GitHub Actions costs by 50% or morenot Earthly
- Supporting teams that need ARM64 architecture runnersnot Earthly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Earthly
- Pricing model not published; requires sales contact
- Earthly Lunar is a recent launch (2025) with limited track record
- Primarily GitHub-focused; limited integration with other platforms
- No public documentation on pricing or feature tiers
WarpBuild
- Per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
- Large configuration runners (32 vCPU) expensive at $0.064/min
- macOS M4 Pro 12-core at $0.16/min is highest-cost option
- BYOC option requires cloud setup by customer
Pricing, plan by plan
Earthly
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Earthly review.
WarpBuild
On request- Linux x86-64 (2vCPU, 8GB)$0.004/minute
- 2 vCPU
- 8 GB RAM
- Standard performance
- Linux x86-64 (4vCPU, 16GB)$0.008/minute
- 4 vCPU
- 16 GB RAM
- Increased performance
- Linux x86-64 (8vCPU, 32GB)$0.016/minute
- 8 vCPU
- 32 GB RAM
- High performance
- Linux x86-64 (16vCPU, 64GB)$0.032/minute
- 16 vCPU
- 64 GB RAM
- Enterprise performance
Which should you pick?
Choose Earthly if
- You need policy as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want multi-stage enforcement.
Choose WarpBuild if
- You need optimized runner infrastructure.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- You also want intelligent caching.
Questions people ask
- Is Earthly or WarpBuild better?
- Neither clearly leads. Earthly starts at Free and WarpBuild at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Earthly or WarpBuild?
- Earthly has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Earthly and On request for WarpBuild.
- Does Earthly or WarpBuild run on more platforms?
- Earthly runs on Web, CLI. WarpBuild runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Cloud.
- Can I use Earthly for free?
- Yes. Earthly has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. WarpBuild starts at On request.
- What is Earthly best used for?
- Earthly is most often used for enforcing engineering standards across ai and human developers, automating incident response procedures across all repositories, embedding compliance requirements into development workflows, standardizing build processes with earthfiles. Of those, enforcing engineering standards across ai and human developers and automating incident response procedures across all repositories are not what WarpBuild is typically brought in for.
- What can Earthly do that WarpBuild cannot?
- Earthly covers Policy as code, Multi-stage enforcement, AI agent governance, Repository-wide policies. WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure, Intelligent caching, Incremental builds, Multi-architecture support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Earthly: What is the difference between Earthfiles and Earthly Lunar?
Earthfiles is an open-source build tool that reached 12,000 GitHub stars and is used by companies like NVIDIA, Intel, and Databricks. Earthly Lunar is a separate governance platform launched in 2025 for enforcing standards across development workflows.
SourceWarpBuild: How much cheaper is WarpBuild compared to GitHub Actions?
WarpBuild offers approximately 50% cost savings compared to GitHub-hosted runners. For example, Linux x86-64 2vCPU/8GB costs $0.004/min with WarpBuild vs $0.008/min with GitHub Actions.
SourceEarthly: How does Earthly Lunar enforce standards?
Lunar converts engineering standards, compliance requirements, and processes documented in AGENTS.md files, wikis, and incident postmortems into enforceable guardrails that apply consistently across repositories and development stages.
SourceWarpBuild: What is BYOC and how does it differ from managed runners?
BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) allows customers to run WarpBuild on their own cloud infrastructure at $0.002/min. Managed runners use WarpBuild's cloud infrastructure. BYOC provides lower costs but requires customer setup.
SourceEarthly: What is the pricing for Earthly Lunar?
Pricing is not published on the website. Interested customers should contact Earthly's sales team for current pricing and feature tiers.
SourceWarpBuild: Does WarpBuild support ARM64 runners?
Yes, WarpBuild offers ARM64 runners at lower costs than x86-64. Linux ARM64 starts at $0.003/min for 2vCPU/8GB configuration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Earthly vs Spacelift
- Earthly vs Dagger
- Earthly vs Nixpacks
- Earthly vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Earthly vs OpsLevel
- Earthly vs Namespace
- Earthly vs Depot
- Earthly vs Blacksmith
- Earthly vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Earthly vs Garden
- Earthly vs Nx Cloud
- Earthly vs ConfigCat
- Earthly vs Cortex
- Earthly vs Deep Code
- Earthly vs Deno
- Earthly vs Fig
- Earthly vs Nix
- Earthly vs Rust
- Earthly vs Ansible
- Earthly vs Refact
- Earthly vs Restate
- Earthly vs RubyMine
- Earthly vs Soketi
- Earthly vs SonarQube
- Earthly vs Sourcegraph
- WarpBuild vs Spacelift
- WarpBuild vs Dagger
- WarpBuild vs Nixpacks
- WarpBuild vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- WarpBuild vs OpsLevel
- WarpBuild vs Namespace
- WarpBuild vs Depot
- WarpBuild vs Blacksmith
- WarpBuild vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- WarpBuild vs Garden
- WarpBuild vs Nx Cloud
- WarpBuild vs ConfigCat
- WarpBuild vs Cortex
- WarpBuild vs Deep Code
- WarpBuild vs Deno
- WarpBuild vs Fig
- WarpBuild vs Nix
- WarpBuild vs Rust
- WarpBuild vs Ansible
- WarpBuild vs Refact
- WarpBuild vs Restate
- WarpBuild vs RubyMine
- WarpBuild vs Soketi
- WarpBuild vs SonarQube
- WarpBuild vs Sourcegraph

