Game Development · head to head
Defold vs Shapr3D
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Defold the Defold License requires you to include the Defold license and copyright notice in any work you create with the engine; Shapr3D the free Basic plan is limited to 2 projects
- They diverge on capability: Defold covers Lua scripting, Shapr3D covers Direct modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Defold and Shapr3D actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Defold
- Lua scripting
- Physics engine
- Sprite system
- Particle effects
- Sound management
- Collection editor
- Mobile optimization
- Lightweight
Only in Shapr3D
- Direct modeling
- Parametric history
- Visualization
- 2D drawings
- Apple Pencil support
- Import/export
- Annotations
- Fusion 360
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Defold
- Building 2D games for mobile, desktop, web and console from a single projectnot Shapr3D
- Shipping small-footprint HTML5 gamesnot Shapr3D
- Teams wanting a free engine with no revenue share on gamesnot Shapr3D
Shapr3D
- Direct modelling CAD on iPad with Apple Pencilnot Defold
- Producing manufacturable solid models and technical drawingsnot Defold
- Sharing CAD projects with collaborators on desktop and tabletnot Defold
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Defold
- The Defold License requires you to include the Defold license and copyright notice in any work you create with the engine
- The licence forbids commercialising original or modified versions of the Defold editor or engine itself
- Significant changes made to the Defold source must be documented under the licence terms
Shapr3D
- The free Basic plan is limited to 2 projects
- Free plan exports only basic resolution 3MF and STL, so no STEP or IGES output
- Free plan caps generative renders at 3 per day; Pro raises this to 50 per day and only Enterprise is unlimited
- Importing SLDPRT and SLDASM SolidWorks files requires Pro
- Importing NX, JT, CREO, Solid Edge and Rhino files requires Enterprise
- Exporting ACIS, FBX, Parasolid and PRC requires Enterprise
- On premises and single tenant data storage is Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is by quote with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Defold
Free- FreeFree
- Full editor
- Lua scripting
- Physics engine
Shapr3D
Free- BasicFree
- 2 projects
- cloud storage
- basic import/export (XT, STEP, IGES, DWG, STL)
- Pro$299/year
- unlimited shared team projects
- up to 2 contributors
- high-resolution exports
- Enterprise$null/custom
- granular access control
- flexible data storage (single tenant/private cloud/on-premises)
- unlimited renders
Which should you pick?
Choose Defold if
- You need lua scripting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Web.
- You also want physics engine.
Choose Shapr3D if
- You need direct modeling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on IPadOS, MacOS, Windows.
- You also want parametric history.
Questions people ask
- Is Defold or Shapr3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. Defold starts at Free and Shapr3D at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Defold or Shapr3D?
- Defold starts at Free and Shapr3D at Free.
- Does Defold or Shapr3D run on more platforms?
- Defold runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android, Web. Shapr3D runs on IPadOS, MacOS, Windows.
- Can I use Defold for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Defold best used for?
- Defold is most often used for building 2d games for mobile, desktop, web and console from a single project, shipping small-footprint html5 games, teams wanting a free engine with no revenue share on games. Of those, building 2d games for mobile, desktop, web and console from a single project and shipping small-footprint html5 games are not what Shapr3D is typically brought in for.
- What can Defold do that Shapr3D cannot?
- Defold covers Lua scripting, Physics engine, Sprite system, Particle effects. Shapr3D covers Direct modeling, Parametric history, Visualization, 2D drawings. Both handle Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Defold: How much does Defold cost?
Defold is completely free with no up-front cost, no licensing cost, no royalties, and no runtime fees. The game engine is free forever, supported by the Defold Foundation with source code available under a developer-friendly license.
SourceShapr3D: How much does Shapr3D cost?
Shapr3D Basic tier is free. Pro tier is $299 per year or available monthly with price not specified on the pricing page. Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting sales.
SourceDefold: Is Defold free to use commercially?
Yes, Defold is free forever with no royalties or revenue sharing required. Developers can create and monetize commercial games without any fees to Defold.
SourceShapr3D: Is there a free trial for Shapr3D Pro?
Yes, Shapr3D offers a 14-day free trial for Pro tier that requires a credit card, plus a 14-day money-back guarantee on purchases.
SourceShapr3D: What is the difference between Shapr3D Pro and Enterprise?
Pro tier includes up to 2 contributors on unlimited shared team projects, 50 renders daily, technical drawings, and AR on iPad. Enterprise provides granular access control, flexible data storage options (single tenant, private cloud, on-premises, or cloud off), unlimited renders, extended import/export formats, and dedicated account management.
SourceShapr3D: Does Shapr3D offer educational pricing?
Yes, Shapr3D is free for students and educators with annual license renewal through an in-app application form.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Defold vs Unity
- Defold vs DragonBones
- Defold vs Aseprite
- Defold vs Godot Engine
- Defold vs Cocos2d-x
- Defold vs LÖVE
- Defold vs Pico-8
- Defold vs Buildbox
- Defold vs Cocos Creator
- Defold vs LDtk
- Defold vs libGDX
- Defold vs MonoGame
- Defold vs Clickteam Fusion
- Defold vs CryEngine
- Defold vs Flax Engine
- Defold vs FMOD
- Defold vs FreeCAD
- Defold vs V-Ray
- Defold vs Enscape
- Defold vs KeyShot
- Defold vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Defold vs IronCAD
- Defold vs Creo
- Defold vs Houdini
- Defold vs Inventor
- Defold vs Plasticity
- Defold vs 3D-Coat
- Defold vs Alibre Design
- Defold vs Substance 3D Designer
- Defold vs Vectorworks
- Defold vs Zoo
- Defold vs Twinmotion
- Defold vs Tinkercad
- Shapr3D vs Unity
- Shapr3D vs DragonBones
- Shapr3D vs Aseprite
- Shapr3D vs Godot Engine
- Shapr3D vs Cocos2d-x
- Shapr3D vs LÖVE
- Shapr3D vs Pico-8
- Shapr3D vs Buildbox
- Shapr3D vs Cocos Creator
- Shapr3D vs LDtk
- Shapr3D vs libGDX
- Shapr3D vs MonoGame
- Shapr3D vs Clickteam Fusion
- Shapr3D vs CryEngine
- Shapr3D vs Flax Engine
- Shapr3D vs FMOD
- Shapr3D vs FreeCAD
- Shapr3D vs V-Ray
- Shapr3D vs Enscape
- Shapr3D vs KeyShot
- Shapr3D vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- Shapr3D vs IronCAD
- Shapr3D vs Creo
- Shapr3D vs Houdini
- Shapr3D vs Inventor
- Shapr3D vs Plasticity
- Shapr3D vs 3D-Coat
- Shapr3D vs Alibre Design
- Shapr3D vs Substance 3D Designer
- Shapr3D vs Vectorworks
- Shapr3D vs Zoo
- Shapr3D vs Twinmotion
- Shapr3D vs Tinkercad


