Softwr

Automation Integration · head to head

Cyclr vs Relevance AI

Cyclr logo

Cyclr

Automation Integration

Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product

From
$1595/month
Rated
-
Relevance AI logo

Relevance AI

Automation Integration

Specialist AI Agents for Every Task

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Relevance AI no published standard pricing tiers or plans
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Relevance AI actually diverge.

Attributes where Cyclr and Relevance AI differ
AttributeCyclrRelevance AI
Starting price$1595/monthOn request
Pricing modelPer month by API call volumeusage-based
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Cyclr

  • White-label integration UI
  • Connector library
  • Workflow builder
  • Custom connectors
  • Regional hosting
  • MCP server offering
  • Usage metering
  • Templates

Only in Relevance AI

Nothing recorded that Cyclr does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Cyclr

  • A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Relevance AI
  • A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Relevance AI
  • A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Relevance AI
  • A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Relevance AI

Relevance AI

  • AI agent platform for automating business processes with LLMsnot Cyclr
  • Low-code automation and workflow orchestration using language modelsnot Cyclr

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Cyclr

  • Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
  • Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
  • Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
  • Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
  • Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.

Relevance AI

  • No published standard pricing tiers or plans
  • Pay-per-task model pricing varies significantly by AI model selection
  • Enterprise quotes require direct contact with sales
  • Task costs range from 0.01 to 0.11 USD depending on model used

Pricing, plan by plan

Cyclr

$1595/month
  • PAYG$1595/month
    • 100,000 API calls included
    • 1 connector included
    • Unlimited integrations and users
  • Growth$2595/month
    • 1,000,000 API calls included
    • 10 connectors included
    • Everything in PAYG
  • Scale$7195/month
    • 5,000,000 API calls included
    • Unlimited connectors
    • Everything in Growth
  • Private Cloud$undefined/month
    • Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
    • Configurable processing and runtime
    • Quoted pricing

Relevance AI

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Relevance AI review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Cyclr if

  • You need white-label integration ui.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want connector library.

Choose Relevance AI if

Nothing in the data separates Relevance AI from Cyclr on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Questions people ask

Is Cyclr or Relevance AI better?
Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Relevance AI at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Relevance AI?
Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Relevance AI at On request.
Does Cyclr or Relevance AI run on more platforms?
Cyclr runs on Web, API. Relevance AI runs on Web.
What is Cyclr best used for?
Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Relevance AI is typically brought in for.
What can Cyclr do that Relevance AI cannot?
Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?

Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.

Relevance AI: What is Relevance AI's pricing model?

Relevance AI uses a pay-per-task model where costs vary by AI model selected. Average cost per task is approximately 0.09 USD, with actual costs ranging from 0.01 to 0.11 USD depending on which model the system routes to. The platform automatically selects the lowest-cost model that meets performance requirements.

Source
Cyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?

No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.

Relevance AI: How much do Relevance AI tasks cost?

Task costs depend on model selection. Example usage shows customers spending 11800 USD monthly while processing 1.24 million tasks. For enterprise custom pricing, users must book a demo or contact the sales team.

Source
Cyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?

Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.

Cyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?

You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads