Developer Tools · head to head
ConfigCat vs Resolver

ConfigCat
Developer Tools
Feature flag service priced per flag and environment with unlimited seats and unlimited monthly active users
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only ConfigCat has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ConfigCat there is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Resolver covers Incident management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ConfigCat and Resolver actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ConfigCat
- Feature flags and configuration
- Percentage rollouts
- Targeting rules and segments
- Unlimited seats
- Global CDN delivery
- Audit log
- Public API and webhooks
- SDKs across languages
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ConfigCat
- A consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-MAU flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worthnot Resolver
- A team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seatnot Resolver
- Decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platformnot Resolver
- A small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tiernot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot ConfigCat
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot ConfigCat
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot ConfigCat
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot ConfigCat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ConfigCat
- There is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.
- Pricing by flag count punishes exactly the hygiene you want: the Pro tier caps at 100 flags, so teams that do not aggressively retire stale flags are pushed to the 325 dollar Smart tier for housekeeping reasons rather than growth.
- The free tier allows only 2 environments, which does not cover the common development, staging and production split, so almost any real deployment starts on a paid plan.
- It is a smaller vendor than the category incumbents, so enterprise procurement teams will find less depth in compliance attestations, contractual terms and reference architecture than LaunchDarkly offers.
- Flag evaluation relies on SDK-side caching of a CDN-delivered config, which is fast but means propagation of a change is eventually consistent rather than instant, something to understand before relying on it as an emergency kill switch.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
ConfigCat
Free- Forever FreeFree
- 10 feature flags
- 2 environments and 2 products
- 2 segments
- Pro$110/month
- 100 feature flags
- 3 environments and 3 products
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Smart$325/month
- Unlimited feature flags
- Unlimited environments, products and segments
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Enterprise$900/month
- Everything in Smart
- Enterprise support and controls
- Unlimited everything on flag counts
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose ConfigCat if
- You need feature flags and configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go.
- You also want percentage rollouts.
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is ConfigCat or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. ConfigCat starts at Free and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ConfigCat or Resolver?
- ConfigCat has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for ConfigCat and On request for Resolver.
- Does ConfigCat or Resolver run on more platforms?
- ConfigCat runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use ConfigCat for free?
- Yes. ConfigCat has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is ConfigCat best used for?
- ConfigCat is most often used for a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth, a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat, decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platform, a small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tier. Of those, a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth and a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can ConfigCat do that Resolver cannot?
- ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Percentage rollouts, Targeting rules and segments, Unlimited seats. Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ConfigCat: How is ConfigCat priced?
By feature flag, environment and product count. Seats, monthly active users and flag reads are unlimited on every plan.
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
ConfigCat: Is the free tier usable?
For small projects yes, but at 10 flags and 2 environments it will not cover a dev, staging and production setup.
Resolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
ConfigCat: Can it run A/B tests?
It can split traffic, but there is no statistics engine. You need a separate analytics tool to decide a winner.
Resolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
ConfigCat: How fast does a flag change take effect?
SDKs poll and cache, so changes propagate on the polling interval rather than instantly.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ConfigCat vs Nix
- ConfigCat vs Depot
- ConfigCat vs Blacksmith
- ConfigCat vs WarpBuild
- ConfigCat vs Namespace
- ConfigCat vs OpsLevel
- ConfigCat vs Earthly
- ConfigCat vs Ansible
- ConfigCat vs Garden
- ConfigCat vs Okteto
- ConfigCat vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- ConfigCat vs Bazel
- ConfigCat vs Backstage
- ConfigCat vs Bitbucket
- ConfigCat vs Claude Code
- ConfigCat vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- ConfigCat vs Cody
- ConfigCat vs Cortex
- ConfigCat vs LogicManager
- ConfigCat vs Diligent
- ConfigCat vs MetricStream
- ConfigCat vs NICE Actimize
- ConfigCat vs Omada Identity
- ConfigCat vs Sardine
- ConfigCat vs Silent Eight
- ConfigCat vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- ConfigCat vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- ConfigCat vs OneTrust
- ConfigCat vs Rhombus Systems
- ConfigCat vs Trulioo
- ConfigCat vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- ConfigCat vs ExpressVPN
- ConfigCat vs Falco
- ConfigCat vs Fenergo
- ConfigCat vs Google Authenticator
- ConfigCat vs Grype
- Resolver vs Nix
- Resolver vs Depot
- Resolver vs Blacksmith
- Resolver vs WarpBuild
- Resolver vs Namespace
- Resolver vs OpsLevel
- Resolver vs Earthly
- Resolver vs Ansible
- Resolver vs Garden
- Resolver vs Okteto
- Resolver vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Resolver vs Bazel
- Resolver vs Backstage
- Resolver vs Bitbucket
- Resolver vs Claude Code
- Resolver vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Resolver vs Cody
- Resolver vs Cortex
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
