Developer Tools · head to head
ConfigCat vs Namespace

ConfigCat
Developer Tools
Feature flag service priced per flag and environment with unlimited seats and unlimited monthly active users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Namespace
Developer Tools
The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ConfigCat there is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.; Namespace developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- They diverge on capability: ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Namespace covers Devboxes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ConfigCat and Namespace actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ConfigCat
- Feature flags and configuration
- Percentage rollouts
- Targeting rules and segments
- Unlimited seats
- Global CDN delivery
- Audit log
- Public API and webhooks
- SDKs across languages
Only in Namespace
- Devboxes
- GitHub Actions runners
- Docker builds
- Cross-invocation caching
- NVMe storage
- High-speed networking
- Multiple OS support
- Bazel and Turborepo support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ConfigCat
- A consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-MAU flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worthnot Namespace
- A team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seatnot Namespace
- Decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platformnot Namespace
- A small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tiernot Namespace
Namespace
- Providing AI coding agents with cloud-based development environmentsnot ConfigCat
- Accelerating CI builds with faster GitHub Actions runnersnot ConfigCat
- Distributing builds across teams with managed infrastructurenot ConfigCat
- Scaling development velocity for monorepo organizationsnot ConfigCat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ConfigCat
- There is no experimentation or statistical analysis engine, so teams wanting real A/B tests with significance testing must buy and integrate a separate analytics or experimentation product.
- Pricing by flag count punishes exactly the hygiene you want: the Pro tier caps at 100 flags, so teams that do not aggressively retire stale flags are pushed to the 325 dollar Smart tier for housekeeping reasons rather than growth.
- The free tier allows only 2 environments, which does not cover the common development, staging and production split, so almost any real deployment starts on a paid plan.
- It is a smaller vendor than the category incumbents, so enterprise procurement teams will find less depth in compliance attestations, contractual terms and reference architecture than LaunchDarkly offers.
- Flag evaluation relies on SDK-side caching of a CDN-delivered config, which is fast but means propagation of a change is eventually consistent rather than instant, something to understand before relying on it as an emergency kill switch.
Namespace
- Developer plan is pay-as-you-go only; minimum usage unclear
- Team plan $100/mo is competitive but usage limits may be tight
- Devbox pricing separate at $0.004/minute could add up quickly
- Enterprise plan requires custom sales conversation
Pricing, plan by plan
ConfigCat
Free- Forever FreeFree
- 10 feature flags
- 2 environments and 2 products
- 2 segments
- Pro$110/month
- 100 feature flags
- 3 environments and 3 products
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Smart$325/month
- Unlimited feature flags
- Unlimited environments, products and segments
- Unlimited seats and MAUs
- Enterprise$900/month
- Everything in Smart
- Enterprise support and controls
- Unlimited everything on flag counts
Namespace
Free- DeveloperFree
- Pay-as-you-go
- On-demand compute
- Docker builds
- Team$100/month
- 100,000 unit minutes
- 1,000 Docker builds
- Everything in Developer
- Business$250/month
- 250,000 unit minutes
- 2,500 Docker builds
- Everything in Team
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom compute/Docker build limits
- Audit log export
- Enterprise SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose ConfigCat if
- You need feature flags and configuration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go.
- You also want percentage rollouts.
Choose Namespace if
- You need devboxes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- You also want github actions runners.
Questions people ask
- Is ConfigCat or Namespace better?
- Neither clearly leads. ConfigCat starts at Free and Namespace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ConfigCat or Namespace?
- ConfigCat starts at Free and Namespace at Free.
- Does ConfigCat or Namespace run on more platforms?
- ConfigCat runs on Web, API, iOS, Android, Node.js, .NET, Java, Python, Go. Namespace runs on Cloud, Mac, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use ConfigCat for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ConfigCat best used for?
- ConfigCat is most often used for a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth, a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat, decoupling deployment from release with percentage rollouts and a kill switch, without buying an experimentation platform, a small team that needs ten flags permanently and can run indefinitely on the free tier. Of those, a consumer or mobile app with millions of users where per-mau flag pricing would cost more than the flags are worth and a team that wants every engineer, product manager and support agent to have a login without paying per seat are not what Namespace is typically brought in for.
- What can ConfigCat do that Namespace cannot?
- ConfigCat covers Feature flags and configuration, Percentage rollouts, Targeting rules and segments, Unlimited seats. Namespace covers Devboxes, GitHub Actions runners, Docker builds, Cross-invocation caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ConfigCat: How is ConfigCat priced?
By feature flag, environment and product count. Seats, monthly active users and flag reads are unlimited on every plan.
Namespace: How is compute usage metered on the Developer plan?
Developer plan uses pay-as-you-go billing. Devboxes bill at $0.004 per minute. Storage and caching services have separate usage-based fees. A 30-day free trial is available to test usage patterns.
SourceConfigCat: Is the free tier usable?
For small projects yes, but at 10 flags and 2 environments it will not cover a dev, staging and production setup.
Namespace: What is the difference between Team and Business plans?
Team ($100/mo) includes 100,000 unit minutes and 1,000 Docker builds with email support. Business ($250/mo) includes 250,000 unit minutes, 2,500 Docker builds, and high concurrency with a dedicated Slack channel.
SourceConfigCat: Can it run A/B tests?
It can split traffic, but there is no statistics engine. You need a separate analytics tool to decide a winner.
Namespace: Can Namespace support AI coding agents?
Yes, Namespace Devboxes are specifically designed as feature-rich development environments for AI coding agents, with full tooling and performance optimization.
SourceConfigCat: How fast does a flag change take effect?
SDKs poll and cache, so changes propagate on the polling interval rather than instantly.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ConfigCat vs Nix
- ConfigCat vs Depot
- ConfigCat vs Blacksmith
- ConfigCat vs WarpBuild
- ConfigCat vs OpsLevel
- ConfigCat vs Earthly
- ConfigCat vs Ansible
- ConfigCat vs Garden
- ConfigCat vs Okteto
- ConfigCat vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- ConfigCat vs Bazel
- ConfigCat vs Fig
- ConfigCat vs Frappe
- ConfigCat vs Git
- ConfigCat vs GoLand
- ConfigCat vs Hookdeck
- ConfigCat vs JFrog Artifactory
- ConfigCat vs CodeSandbox
- ConfigCat vs Daytona
- ConfigCat vs Webpack
- ConfigCat vs Avo
- ConfigCat vs Azure DevOps
- ConfigCat vs Backstage
- ConfigCat vs Bitbucket
- ConfigCat vs Claude Code
- Namespace vs Nix
- Namespace vs Depot
- Namespace vs Blacksmith
- Namespace vs WarpBuild
- Namespace vs OpsLevel
- Namespace vs Earthly
- Namespace vs Ansible
- Namespace vs Garden
- Namespace vs Okteto
- Namespace vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Namespace vs Bazel
- Namespace vs Fig
- Namespace vs Frappe
- Namespace vs Git
- Namespace vs GoLand
- Namespace vs Hookdeck
- Namespace vs JFrog Artifactory
- Namespace vs CodeSandbox
- Namespace vs Daytona
- Namespace vs Webpack
- Namespace vs Avo
- Namespace vs Azure DevOps
- Namespace vs Backstage
- Namespace vs Bitbucket
- Namespace vs Claude Code
