Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Entrust Identity as a Service

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Cody has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Entrust Identity as a Service actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cody | Entrust Identity as a Service |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2/month |
| Pricing model | freemium | Per user per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2013 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Entrust Identity as a Service does not also cover.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Cody
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Cody
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Cody
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Entrust Identity as a Service better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Entrust Identity as a Service at $2/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Entrust Identity as a Service?
- Cody has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cody and $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service.
- Does Cody or Entrust Identity as a Service run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Yes. Cody has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Entrust Identity as a Service is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that Entrust Identity as a Service cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Cody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Cody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Cisco Duo
- Cody vs JumpCloud
- Cody vs Ping Identity
- Cody vs Frontegg
- Cody vs Authelia
- Cody vs Beyond Identity
- Cody vs Transmit Security
- Cody vs Akeyless
- Cody vs authentik
- Cody vs Logto
- Cody vs Speakeasy
- Cody vs Authy
- Cody vs ExpressVPN
- Cody vs Falco
- Cody vs Fenergo
- Cody vs Google Authenticator
- Cody vs Grype
- Cody vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Turborepo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Visual Studio Code
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ESLint
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs pnpm
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Sourcegraph
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Sweep
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Deep Code
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs GitHub Copilot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bazel
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fig
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs GoLand
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Steampipe
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Tilt
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs WarpBuild
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Webpack
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Avo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Azure DevOps
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs PhpStorm
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision

