Cybersecurity · head to head
Beyond Identity vs Cody

Beyond Identity
Cybersecurity
Phishing-resistant passwordless authentication with device trust enforced at every login
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Cody has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Beyond Identity it is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.; Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Beyond Identity and Cody actually diverge.
| Attribute | Beyond Identity | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Beyond Identity
- Device-bound credentials
- Continuous device posture
- No shared secrets
- Identity provider integration
- Secure developer signing
- Administrator policy engine
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Beyond Identity does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Beyond Identity
- An organisation that suffered a breach through MFA push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineerednot Cody
- A software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patchesnot Cody
- A firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systemsnot Cody
- A security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on topnot Cody
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Beyond Identity
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Beyond Identity
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Beyond Identity
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Beyond Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Beyond Identity
- It is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.
- Every device that authenticates needs the platform authenticator installed, which makes onboarding contractors, third parties and shared kiosks awkward and sometimes impossible.
- Pricing is quoted per user with no published rates, so buyers cannot benchmark it against the increasingly capable passkey support now included in identity provider base licences.
- Losing all enrolled devices requires an administrative recovery path, and organisations that design that path poorly reintroduce a social-engineering target at the helpdesk.
- Legacy applications that only speak passwords or older protocols need a federation shim or stay outside the policy, so coverage is rarely complete in an estate with old systems.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Pricing, plan by plan
Beyond Identity
On request- Secure Access Platform$undefined/year
- Per-user annual subscription quoted by seat count
- Deployed alongside an existing identity provider rather than replacing it
- Device posture integrations with major EDR and MDM vendors included
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Beyond Identity if
- You need device-bound credentials.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want continuous device posture.
Questions people ask
- Is Beyond Identity or Cody better?
- Neither clearly leads. Beyond Identity starts at On request and Cody at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Beyond Identity or Cody?
- Cody has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Beyond Identity and Free for Cody.
- Does Beyond Identity or Cody run on more platforms?
- Beyond Identity runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android. Cody runs on Web.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Yes. Cody has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Beyond Identity starts at On request.
- What is Beyond Identity best used for?
- Beyond Identity is most often used for an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered, a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches, a firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systems, a security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on top. Of those, an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered and a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches are not what Cody is typically brought in for.
- What can Beyond Identity do that Cody cannot?
- Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials, Continuous device posture, No shared secrets, Identity provider integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Beyond Identity: Does it replace Okta or Entra ID?
No. It sits in front of them as the authentication method. Budget for both.
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceBeyond Identity: What happens when a user loses their laptop?
They authenticate from another enrolled device, or go through an administrative recovery flow. Designing that recovery well matters, because it is the weakest point.
Cody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceBeyond Identity: Is it different from passkeys?
The credential mechanism is similar in spirit. The difference is enforcing device security posture at every authentication, which standard passkeys do not do.
Cody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceRelated pages
More on Beyond Identity
Other head to heads
- Beyond Identity vs 1Password
- Beyond Identity vs Cisco Duo
- Beyond Identity vs Transmit Security
- Beyond Identity vs Teleport
- Beyond Identity vs Authelia
- Beyond Identity vs authentik
- Beyond Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Beyond Identity vs Clerk
- Beyond Identity vs Frontegg
- Beyond Identity vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Beyond Identity vs Logto
- Beyond Identity vs Ory
- Beyond Identity vs WorkOS
- Beyond Identity vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Beyond Identity vs Milestone XProtect
- Beyond Identity vs Osano
- Beyond Identity vs Proton Mail
- Beyond Identity vs Veriff
- Beyond Identity vs Turborepo
- Beyond Identity vs Visual Studio Code
- Beyond Identity vs ESLint
- Beyond Identity vs pnpm
- Beyond Identity vs Sourcegraph
- Beyond Identity vs Sweep
- Beyond Identity vs Deep Code
- Beyond Identity vs GitHub Copilot
- Beyond Identity vs Bazel
- Beyond Identity vs Fig
- Beyond Identity vs GoLand
- Beyond Identity vs Steampipe
- Beyond Identity vs Tilt
- Beyond Identity vs WarpBuild
- Beyond Identity vs Webpack
- Beyond Identity vs Avo
- Beyond Identity vs Azure DevOps
- Beyond Identity vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs 1Password
- Cody vs Cisco Duo
- Cody vs Transmit Security
- Cody vs Teleport
- Cody vs Authelia
- Cody vs authentik
- Cody vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Cody vs Clerk
- Cody vs Frontegg
- Cody vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Cody vs Logto
- Cody vs Ory
- Cody vs WorkOS
- Cody vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Cody vs Milestone XProtect
- Cody vs Osano
- Cody vs Proton Mail
- Cody vs Veriff
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm

