Developer Tools · head to head
Cody vs Frontegg

Frontegg
Cybersecurity
Customer identity and access management platform for SaaS applications
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page; Frontegg detailed per-unit pricing beyond the free tier is not published, requiring use of an online calculator or sales contact to estimate costs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cody and Frontegg actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Frontegg does not also cover.
Only in Frontegg
- Hosted login
- Enterprise SSO/SCIM
- Multi-tenant organizations
- Custom domains
- M2M tokens
- Fraud protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Frontegg
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Frontegg
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Frontegg
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Frontegg
Frontegg
- Adding enterprise SSO/SCIM to a B2B SaaS productnot Cody
- Multi-tenant customer identity managementnot Cody
- White-labeled, custom-domain login experiencesnot Cody
- Securing AI agent access to a SaaS product via Agen.conot Cody
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Frontegg
- Detailed per-unit pricing beyond the free tier is not published, requiring use of an online calculator or sales contact to estimate costs.
- Advanced fraud protection and multiple environments are Enterprise-only, unavailable on the Pay As You Go plan.
- The 7,500 free monthly active users is comparatively modest next to some competitors' free tiers.
- As a broader CIAM platform, it can be more complex to integrate than lighter-weight developer-first auth tools for smaller apps.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Frontegg
Free- Pay As You GoFree
- 7,500 monthly active users included
- 5 enterprise connections (SSO/SCIM)
- Unlimited organizations
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom pricing
- Multiple environments
- Advanced fraud protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Frontegg if
- You need hosted login.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want enterprise sso/scim.
Questions people ask
- Is Cody or Frontegg better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cody starts at Free and Frontegg at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cody or Frontegg?
- Cody starts at Free and Frontegg at Free.
- Does Cody or Frontegg run on more platforms?
- Cody runs on Web. Frontegg runs on web, api.
- Can I use Cody for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cody best used for?
- Cody is most often used for code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides, developer chat with codebase context awareness, automated debugging and error identification, customizable prompts for workflow automation. Of those, code completion and intelligent autocomplete in ides and developer chat with codebase context awareness are not what Frontegg is typically brought in for.
- What can Cody do that Frontegg cannot?
- Frontegg covers Hosted login, Enterprise SSO/SCIM, Multi-tenant organizations, Custom domains.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceFrontegg: What does Frontegg cost?
Frontegg's Pay As You Go plan is free up to 7,500 monthly active users, after which pricing scales with users, enterprise connections and M2M tokens via an online calculator; Enterprise pricing is custom.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceFrontegg: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the free Pay As You Go plan includes 7,500 monthly active users, 5 enterprise SSO/SCIM connections, unlimited organizations, and a custom domain.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceFrontegg: How is usage metered?
Pricing is consumption-based, driven by monthly active users, monthly enterprise connections (SSO/SCIM), and monthly M2M tokens, with customers paying only for usage beyond the free 7,500-user threshold.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Clerk
- Cody vs Authelia
- Cody vs Akeyless
- Cody vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Cody vs 1Password
- Cody vs authentik
- Cody vs Logto
- Cody vs Ory Kratos
- Cody vs Ping Identity
- Cody vs Speakeasy
- Cody vs Doppler
- Cody vs Infisical
- Cody vs Diligent
- Cody vs Endor Labs
- Cody vs Enpass
- Cody vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Cody vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Frontegg vs Turborepo
- Frontegg vs Visual Studio Code
- Frontegg vs ESLint
- Frontegg vs pnpm
- Frontegg vs Sourcegraph
- Frontegg vs Sweep
- Frontegg vs Deep Code
- Frontegg vs GitHub Copilot
- Frontegg vs Bazel
- Frontegg vs Fig
- Frontegg vs GoLand
- Frontegg vs Steampipe
- Frontegg vs Tilt
- Frontegg vs WarpBuild
- Frontegg vs Webpack
- Frontegg vs Avo
- Frontegg vs Azure DevOps
- Frontegg vs PhpStorm
- Frontegg vs Clerk
- Frontegg vs Authelia
- Frontegg vs Akeyless
- Frontegg vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Frontegg vs 1Password
- Frontegg vs authentik
- Frontegg vs Logto
- Frontegg vs Ory Kratos
- Frontegg vs Ping Identity
- Frontegg vs Speakeasy
- Frontegg vs Doppler
- Frontegg vs Infisical
- Frontegg vs Diligent
- Frontegg vs Endor Labs
- Frontegg vs Enpass
- Frontegg vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Frontegg vs Fortinet FortiGate

