Softwr

Recruitment · head to head

Codility vs Lever

Codility logo

Codility

Recruitment

Technical coding assessment platform priced by annual invite volume, not by seat count alone

From
On request
Rated
-
Lever logo

Lever

Recruitment

Talent acquisition suite built for collaboration

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Codility pricing is capped by candidate invites per year, not by hiring headcount, so a busy recruiting quarter or hiring surge can exhaust the allowance faster than a company's growth plan anticipated.; Lever customized pricing requires sales contact, no public pricing
  • They diverge on capability: Codility covers Coding task library, Lever covers Applicant Tracking.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Codility and Lever actually diverge.

Attributes where Codility and Lever differ
AttributeCodilityLever
Pricing modelPer year by candidate invite volume, with platform user limits per tierquote
FoundedUnknown2012

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Codility

  • Coding task library
  • Automated scoring
  • Plagiarism detection
  • Live coding interviews
  • ATS integrations
  • Candidate experience reporting

Only in Lever

  • Applicant Tracking
  • Candidate CRM
  • Sourcing
  • Interview Management
  • Analytics
  • Offer Management
  • LinkedIn
  • Indeed

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Codility

  • An engineering team with a steady, moderate hiring volume that fits comfortably within the Starter or Scale invite allowancenot Lever
  • A company that wants automated coding assessments integrated directly into an existing applicant tracking systemnot Lever
  • A hiring team concerned about AI-generated or copied solutions wanting built-in plagiarism detectionnot Lever
  • An organisation running live, interviewer-led coding sessions in addition to take-home assessmentsnot Lever

Lever

  • Applicant tracking from sourcing through offernot Codility
  • Building and nurturing talent pipelines of passive candidatesnot Codility
  • Automating interview scheduling, follow-ups and offer lettersnot Codility
  • Reporting on hiring performance across sourcesnot Codility
  • Screening at volume with AI ranking and recommendationsnot Codility

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Codility

  • Pricing is capped by candidate invites per year, not by hiring headcount, so a busy recruiting quarter or hiring surge can exhaust the allowance faster than a company's growth plan anticipated.
  • The Starter plan supports only one platform user, making it impractical for any team with more than a single recruiter or hiring manager needing direct access.
  • Annual-only billing on the Starter tier requires a full year's commitment before a company knows whether its actual invite usage matches the plan it bought.
  • As with any automated coding assessment, over-reliance on it as an early filter risks screening out strong candidates who do not perform well under artificial timed test conditions.
  • Its assessment format is squarely aimed at software engineering roles, so it offers no coverage for non-technical or adjacent technical hiring needs that HackerRank's broader question library covers.

Lever

  • Customized pricing requires sales contact, no public pricing
  • Premium features like advanced CRM functionality require additional fees
  • Implementation requires some technical configuration

Pricing, plan by plan

Codility

On request
  • Starter$1200/year
    • Up to 120 assessment invites per year
    • 1 platform user
    • Annual billing only
  • Scale$500/month
    • Up to 300 assessment invites per year (25 a month)
    • 3 platform users
    • Discount available on annual billing
  • Custom$undefined/year
    • Custom quote
    • Unlimited or high-volume invites
    • Unlimited users, SSO, integrations and dedicated support

Lever

On request
  • LeverTRM$undefined/month
    • ATS
    • CRM
    • Sourcing
  • LeverTRM for Enterprise$undefined/month
    • All LeverTRM features
    • Advanced Security
    • Dedicated Support

Which should you pick?

Choose Codility if

  • You need coding task library.
  • You also want automated scoring.

Choose Lever if

  • You need applicant tracking.
  • You also want candidate crm.

Questions people ask

Is Codility or Lever better?
Neither clearly leads. Codility starts at On request and Lever at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Codility or Lever?
Codility starts at On request and Lever at On request.
Does Codility or Lever run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Codility best used for?
Codility is most often used for an engineering team with a steady, moderate hiring volume that fits comfortably within the starter or scale invite allowance, a company that wants automated coding assessments integrated directly into an existing applicant tracking system, a hiring team concerned about ai-generated or copied solutions wanting built-in plagiarism detection, an organisation running live, interviewer-led coding sessions in addition to take-home assessments. Of those, an engineering team with a steady, moderate hiring volume that fits comfortably within the starter or scale invite allowance and a company that wants automated coding assessments integrated directly into an existing applicant tracking system are not what Lever is typically brought in for.
What can Codility do that Lever cannot?
Codility covers Coding task library, Automated scoring, Plagiarism detection, Live coding interviews. Lever covers Applicant Tracking, Candidate CRM, Sourcing, Interview Management.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Codility: What counts against the invite limit?

Each candidate assessment invitation sent counts toward the plan's annual (or monthly, for Scale) invite allowance.

Lever: What is Lever used for?

Lever is modern recruiting software that centralizes recruiting into a single system for sourcing candidates, managing applications, scheduling interviews, collaborating with hiring managers, automating workflows, and measuring hiring performance.

Source
Codility: What happens if we exceed our invite allowance?

Additional invites beyond the plan limit typically incur per-invite charges or require an upgrade to a higher tier.

Lever: Does Lever include both ATS and CRM?

Yes. Lever integrates comprehensive Applicant Tracking System (ATS) and Candidate Relationship Management (CRM) functionalities within a single offering called LeverTRM, with features like AI-powered screening and interview transcripts.

Source
Codility: Is there a free tier?

No published free tier exists; all plans require payment, with Starter billed annually only.

Lever: What integrations does Lever support?

Lever integrates with 300+ tools including Slack for notifications, Zoom for interviews, calendar applications for scheduling, background check services, job boards, and leading HRIS platforms for talent management workflows.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads