Backup · head to head
CloudCasa vs Nasuni

CloudCasa
Backup
SaaS Kubernetes backup and migration with published per-node pricing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Nasuni
File Storage
Cloud file storage that keeps the authoritative copy in object storage and caches it at each site
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only CloudCasa has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CloudCasa at $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.; Nasuni subscription is based on managed capacity, so cold data that would cost almost nothing in an archive tier keeps paying the full platform rate, and there is limited incentive structure to delete.
- They diverge on capability: CloudCasa covers SaaS control plane, Nasuni covers Edge caching appliances.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudCasa and Nasuni actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CloudCasa
- SaaS control plane
- Free tier
- Cross-cluster restore
- Managed service support
- Bring your own storage
- Velero compatibility
Only in Nasuni
- Edge caching appliances
- Object storage back end
- Continuous versioning
- Global file lock
- Rapid site recovery
- Ransomware detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudCasa
- A team wanting Kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup servernot Nasuni
- A small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence costnot Nasuni
- An organisation running Velero already and wanting a managed control plane and catalogue over the topnot Nasuni
- Migrating workloads between EKS and AKS where the tool must restore into a different distributionnot Nasuni
Nasuni
- Consolidating file servers across many branch offices onto one namespace without shipping data between sitesnot CloudCasa
- Replacing a NAS plus backup plus offsite replication stack with a single recovery modelnot CloudCasa
- Engineering or media teams in different regions who need to work on the same large project filesnot CloudCasa
- An organisation that has been hit by ransomware on file shares and needs version level rollback rather than tape restoresnot CloudCasa
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudCasa
- At $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.
- The control plane is SaaS, so cluster metadata and backup catalogues sit with the vendor, which rules it out where policy prohibits external services holding infrastructure detail.
- Per-node pricing punishes clusters built from many small nodes, so the licensing metric can push architecture decisions in directions the platform team would not otherwise choose.
- The free tier stops at five nodes with no intermediate step, so growth from five to six nodes moves you from nothing to a full commercial rate.
- Catalogic is a much smaller vendor than Veeam or Commvault, which matters for procurement risk assessments and for long-term support commitments on a system you may depend on for years.
Nasuni
- Subscription is based on managed capacity, so cold data that would cost almost nothing in an archive tier keeps paying the full platform rate, and there is limited incentive structure to delete.
- Every site needs an appliance, virtual or physical, which is a footprint and a patching obligation at locations that previously had only a file server or nothing.
- A read that misses the local cache is fetched from object storage, so the first access to a cold large file is at cloud latency and users experience it as the system being slow at random.
- Global file lock serialises access across regions, so genuinely collaborative editing of the same large files still involves waiting for another site to release the lock rather than merging.
- The object storage underneath is your contract, so API transaction and egress charges from Azure or AWS land on your cloud bill and are not covered by the Nasuni subscription you were quoted against.
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudCasa
Free- BasicFree
- Up to 5 nodes at no cost
- Daily backup schedules for clusters and namespaces
- Basic and advanced restore options
- CloudCasa Pro$69/month
- Per node per month
- Advanced backup policies
- Application-aware backups
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Volume pricing negotiated
- Dedicated support and SLAs
- Custom retention and residency arrangements
Nasuni
On request- Nasuni File Data Platform$undefined/year
- Subscription based on managed capacity
- Edge appliances at each site
- Continuous versioning and rapid recovery
Which should you pick?
Choose CloudCasa if
- You need saas control plane.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want free tier.
Choose Nasuni if
- You need edge caching appliances.
- You work on Web, Windows, VMware, Hyper-V, AWS, Azure.
- You also want object storage back end.
Questions people ask
- Is CloudCasa or Nasuni better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudCasa starts at Free and Nasuni at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudCasa or Nasuni?
- CloudCasa has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CloudCasa and On request for Nasuni.
- Does CloudCasa or Nasuni run on more platforms?
- CloudCasa runs on Kubernetes, Web. Nasuni runs on Web, Windows, VMware, Hyper-V, AWS, Azure.
- Can I use CloudCasa for free?
- Yes. CloudCasa has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Nasuni starts at On request.
- What is CloudCasa best used for?
- CloudCasa is most often used for a team wanting kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup server, a small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence cost, an organisation running velero already and wanting a managed control plane and catalogue over the top, migrating workloads between eks and aks where the tool must restore into a different distribution. Of those, a team wanting kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup server and a small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence cost are not what Nasuni is typically brought in for.
- What can CloudCasa do that Nasuni cannot?
- CloudCasa covers SaaS control plane, Free tier, Cross-cluster restore, Managed service support. Nasuni covers Edge caching appliances, Object storage back end, Continuous versioning, Global file lock.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CloudCasa: What does it cost?
Free for up to five nodes. CloudCasa Pro is $69 per node per month. Enterprise arrangements are negotiated.
Nasuni: Do I still need a backup product?
That is the pitch: continuous versioning in object storage replaces the backup schedule for file data. Databases and virtual machines still need their own tooling.
CloudCasa: Where does the backup data go?
Typically to your own S3-compatible bucket. The vendor hosts the control plane and catalogue, not necessarily your data.
Nasuni: Who owns the storage account?
You do. Nasuni writes into object storage you contract for, which also means the cloud provider bills you directly for it.
CloudCasa: Does it work with Velero?
Yes. It can manage existing Velero installations, which makes it a lower-friction upgrade than a rip and replace.
Nasuni: How fast is recovery of a whole site?
An appliance can be serving files within hours because data is pulled on demand, but performance stays degraded while the cache refills.
Nasuni: Is pricing published?
No. Nasuni sells through quotes based on managed capacity and site count, so comparisons need a real proposal rather than a list price.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CloudCasa vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- CloudCasa vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- CloudCasa vs HYCU
- CloudCasa vs Trilio
- CloudCasa vs Portworx Backup
- CloudCasa vs Velero
- CloudCasa vs BDRShield
- CloudCasa vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- CloudCasa vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- CloudCasa vs Redstor
- CloudCasa vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- CloudCasa vs Spanning Backup
- CloudCasa vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- CloudCasa vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- CloudCasa vs IBM Storage Protect
- CloudCasa vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- CloudCasa vs Macrium Reflect
- CloudCasa vs Panzura
- CloudCasa vs Nextcloud
- CloudCasa vs LucidLink
- CloudCasa vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- CloudCasa vs Zerto
- CloudCasa vs VAST Data
- CloudCasa vs TrueNAS
- CloudCasa vs Scality RING
- CloudCasa vs Carbonite
- CloudCasa vs Ceph
- CloudCasa vs MinIO
- CloudCasa vs Cloudflare R2
- CloudCasa vs pCloud
- CloudCasa vs Storj
- CloudCasa vs Sync.com
- CloudCasa vs Tigris
- CloudCasa vs Tresorit
- Nasuni vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Nasuni vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Nasuni vs HYCU
- Nasuni vs Trilio
- Nasuni vs Portworx Backup
- Nasuni vs Velero
- Nasuni vs BDRShield
- Nasuni vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Nasuni vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Nasuni vs Redstor
- Nasuni vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Nasuni vs Spanning Backup
- Nasuni vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Nasuni vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Nasuni vs IBM Storage Protect
- Nasuni vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Nasuni vs Macrium Reflect
- Nasuni vs Panzura
- Nasuni vs Nextcloud
- Nasuni vs LucidLink
- Nasuni vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Nasuni vs Zerto
- Nasuni vs VAST Data
- Nasuni vs TrueNAS
- Nasuni vs Scality RING
- Nasuni vs Carbonite
- Nasuni vs Ceph
- Nasuni vs MinIO
- Nasuni vs Cloudflare R2
- Nasuni vs pCloud
- Nasuni vs Storj
- Nasuni vs Sync.com
- Nasuni vs Tigris
- Nasuni vs Tresorit
