Backup · head to head
CloudCasa vs Velero

CloudCasa
Backup
SaaS Kubernetes backup and migration with published per-node pricing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Velero
Backup
Open source backup and migration for Kubernetes cluster resources
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CloudCasa at $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.; Velero there is no vendor support contract from the project itself, so a failed restore during an outage is resolved by your team reading source code and GitHub issues.
- They diverge on capability: CloudCasa covers SaaS control plane, Velero covers Cluster resource backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudCasa and Velero actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CloudCasa
- SaaS control plane
- Free tier
- Managed service support
- Bring your own storage
- Velero compatibility
Only in Velero
- Cluster resource backup
- Volume snapshots
- File-level backup
- Backup hooks
- Scheduled backups
- Object storage targets
Both cover
- Cross-cluster restore
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudCasa
- A team wanting Kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup servernot Velero
- A small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence costnot Velero
- An organisation running Velero already and wanting a managed control plane and catalogue over the topnot Velero
- Migrating workloads between EKS and AKS where the tool must restore into a different distributionnot Velero
Velero
- A platform team needing namespace-level restore after an accidental deletion, with no budget for a backup productnot CloudCasa
- Migrating workloads between Kubernetes clusters or between cloud providers using backup and restorenot CloudCasa
- Capturing cluster configuration before a risky upgrade so the previous state can be reinstatednot CloudCasa
- An organisation proving a Kubernetes recovery capability to an auditor before deciding whether to buy a commercial productnot CloudCasa
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudCasa
- At $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.
- The control plane is SaaS, so cluster metadata and backup catalogues sit with the vendor, which rules it out where policy prohibits external services holding infrastructure detail.
- Per-node pricing punishes clusters built from many small nodes, so the licensing metric can push architecture decisions in directions the platform team would not otherwise choose.
- The free tier stops at five nodes with no intermediate step, so growth from five to six nodes moves you from nothing to a full commercial rate.
- Catalogic is a much smaller vendor than Veeam or Commvault, which matters for procurement risk assessments and for long-term support commitments on a system you may depend on for years.
Velero
- There is no vendor support contract from the project itself, so a failed restore during an outage is resolved by your team reading source code and GitHub issues.
- Application consistency depends on backup hooks you write and maintain, and a database backed up without a correct hook restores to a state that may not be usable.
- Restore ordering across dependent resources such as custom resource definitions and operators needs manual attention, and complex applications frequently need a documented runbook rather than a single restore command.
- Corporate engineering investment became uncertain after Broadcom acquired VMware, which is a real consideration for anyone building a long retention policy on the project.
- Object storage egress charges apply on restore and are billed by your cloud provider, so a full cluster recovery from another region carries a cost discovered during the incident rather than during planning.
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudCasa
Free- BasicFree
- Up to 5 nodes at no cost
- Daily backup schedules for clusters and namespaces
- Basic and advanced restore options
- CloudCasa Pro$69/month
- Per node per month
- Advanced backup policies
- Application-aware backups
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Volume pricing negotiated
- Dedicated support and SLAs
- Custom retention and residency arrangements
Velero
Free- VeleroFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed
- No cluster or capacity limits
- Community support via Kubernetes Slack and GitHub
Which should you pick?
Choose CloudCasa if
- You need saas control plane.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want free tier.
Choose Velero if
- You need cluster resource backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want volume snapshots.
Questions people ask
- Is CloudCasa or Velero better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudCasa starts at Free and Velero at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudCasa or Velero?
- CloudCasa starts at Free and Velero at Free.
- Does CloudCasa or Velero run on more platforms?
- CloudCasa runs on Kubernetes, Web. Velero runs on Linux.
- Can I use CloudCasa for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CloudCasa best used for?
- CloudCasa is most often used for a team wanting kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup server, a small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence cost, an organisation running velero already and wanting a managed control plane and catalogue over the top, migrating workloads between eks and aks where the tool must restore into a different distribution. Of those, a team wanting kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup server and a small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence cost are not what Velero is typically brought in for.
- What can CloudCasa do that Velero cannot?
- CloudCasa covers SaaS control plane, Free tier, Managed service support, Bring your own storage. Velero covers Cluster resource backup, Volume snapshots, File-level backup, Backup hooks. Both handle Cross-cluster restore.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CloudCasa: What does it cost?
Free for up to five nodes. CloudCasa Pro is $69 per node per month. Enterprise arrangements are negotiated.
Velero: Can we buy support for Velero?
Not from the project. Several commercial Kubernetes backup products package or extend it and sell support, which is the practical route to an accountable vendor.
CloudCasa: Where does the backup data go?
Typically to your own S3-compatible bucket. The vendor hosts the control plane and catalogue, not necessarily your data.
Velero: Does it back up persistent volume data?
Yes, through cloud or Container Storage Interface snapshots, or through file-level upload where snapshots are not available.
CloudCasa: Does it work with Velero?
Yes. It can manage existing Velero installations, which makes it a lower-friction upgrade than a rip and replace.
Velero: What does it cost?
Nothing to licence. You pay for object storage capacity and for egress on restore, both billed by your cloud provider.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CloudCasa vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- CloudCasa vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- CloudCasa vs HYCU
- CloudCasa vs Trilio
- CloudCasa vs Portworx Backup
- CloudCasa vs BDRShield
- CloudCasa vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- CloudCasa vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- CloudCasa vs Redstor
- CloudCasa vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- CloudCasa vs Spanning Backup
- CloudCasa vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- CloudCasa vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- CloudCasa vs IBM Storage Protect
- CloudCasa vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- CloudCasa vs Macrium Reflect
- CloudCasa vs Restic
- CloudCasa vs UrBackup
- CloudCasa vs Kopia
- CloudCasa vs Amanda Enterprise
- CloudCasa vs Bacula Enterprise
- CloudCasa vs Borg Backup
- CloudCasa vs Axcient x360Recover
- CloudCasa vs Clonezilla
- CloudCasa vs Clumio
- CloudCasa vs Cohesity
- Velero vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Velero vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Velero vs HYCU
- Velero vs Trilio
- Velero vs Portworx Backup
- Velero vs BDRShield
- Velero vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Velero vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Velero vs Redstor
- Velero vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Velero vs Spanning Backup
- Velero vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Velero vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Velero vs IBM Storage Protect
- Velero vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Velero vs Macrium Reflect
- Velero vs Restic
- Velero vs UrBackup
- Velero vs Kopia
- Velero vs Amanda Enterprise
- Velero vs Bacula Enterprise
- Velero vs Borg Backup
- Velero vs Axcient x360Recover
- Velero vs Clonezilla
- Velero vs Clumio
- Velero vs Cohesity
