Backup · head to head
CloudCasa vs Portworx Backup

CloudCasa
Backup
SaaS Kubernetes backup and migration with published per-node pricing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Portworx Backup
Backup
Kubernetes application backup with a free tier up to one terabyte
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CloudCasa at $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.; Portworx Backup the paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- They diverge on capability: CloudCasa covers SaaS control plane, Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudCasa and Portworx Backup actually diverge.
| Attribute | CloudCasa | Portworx Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per node per month | Per node hour |
| Platforms | Kubernetes, Web | Web, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CloudCasa
- SaaS control plane
- Managed service support
- Bring your own storage
- Velero compatibility
Only in Portworx Backup
- Application-level backup
- Any CSI provider
- Namespace and label selection
- Scheduled policies
- Role-based access
Both cover
- Free tier
- Cross-cluster restore
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudCasa
- A team wanting Kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup servernot Portworx Backup
- A small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence costnot Portworx Backup
- An organisation running Velero already and wanting a managed control plane and catalogue over the topnot Portworx Backup
- Migrating workloads between EKS and AKS where the tool must restore into a different distributionnot Portworx Backup
Portworx Backup
- A platform team running Velero that needs an accountable vendor for restore failuresnot CloudCasa
- Protecting Kubernetes applications across EKS, GKE and on premises clusters under one policy setnot CloudCasa
- Restoring a namespace into a different cloud provider as a disaster recovery testnot CloudCasa
- A small team that wants real Kubernetes backup within the free one terabyte tier before committing budgetnot CloudCasa
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudCasa
- At $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.
- The control plane is SaaS, so cluster metadata and backup catalogues sit with the vendor, which rules it out where policy prohibits external services holding infrastructure detail.
- Per-node pricing punishes clusters built from many small nodes, so the licensing metric can push architecture decisions in directions the platform team would not otherwise choose.
- The free tier stops at five nodes with no intermediate step, so growth from five to six nodes moves you from nothing to a full commercial rate.
- Catalogic is a much smaller vendor than Veeam or Commvault, which matters for procurement risk assessments and for long-term support commitments on a system you may depend on for years.
Portworx Backup
- The paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- It is licensed separately from Portworx Enterprise, so organisations that assumed storage and backup came together find a second subscription in the quote.
- The free tier caps at one terabyte of protected data, which is quickly exceeded by any database of consequence and forces a jump straight to the minimum commitment.
- Backup targets are object stores you provide, so restore egress charges from your cloud provider are outside the vendor price and appear during a recovery rather than in procurement.
- Application-consistent backup of databases still depends on correct pre and post hooks, so the product does not remove the requirement to understand and rehearse your own restore ordering.
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudCasa
Free- BasicFree
- Up to 5 nodes at no cost
- Daily backup schedules for clusters and namespaces
- Basic and advanced restore options
- CloudCasa Pro$69/month
- Per node per month
- Advanced backup policies
- Application-aware backups
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Volume pricing negotiated
- Dedicated support and SLAs
- Custom retention and residency arrangements
Portworx Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Up to one terabyte of protected data
- No feature restrictions
- Fully managed service
- Portworx Backup$0.2/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Unlimited protected capacity
- Any Container Storage Interface provider
Which should you pick?
Choose CloudCasa if
- You need saas control plane.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want managed service support.
Choose Portworx Backup if
- You need application-level backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want any csi provider.
Questions people ask
- Is CloudCasa or Portworx Backup better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudCasa starts at Free and Portworx Backup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudCasa or Portworx Backup?
- CloudCasa starts at Free and Portworx Backup at Free.
- Does CloudCasa or Portworx Backup run on more platforms?
- CloudCasa runs on Kubernetes, Web. Portworx Backup runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use CloudCasa for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CloudCasa best used for?
- CloudCasa is most often used for a team wanting kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup server, a small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence cost, an organisation running velero already and wanting a managed control plane and catalogue over the top, migrating workloads between eks and aks where the tool must restore into a different distribution. Of those, a team wanting kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup server and a small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence cost are not what Portworx Backup is typically brought in for.
- What can CloudCasa do that Portworx Backup cannot?
- CloudCasa covers SaaS control plane, Managed service support, Bring your own storage, Velero compatibility. Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup, Any CSI provider, Namespace and label selection, Scheduled policies. Both handle Free tier, Cross-cluster restore.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CloudCasa: What does it cost?
Free for up to five nodes. CloudCasa Pro is $69 per node per month. Enterprise arrangements are negotiated.
Portworx Backup: Is the free tier real?
Yes, up to one terabyte of protected data with no feature restrictions as a managed service. It is a usable production tier for small footprints, not a trial.
CloudCasa: Where does the backup data go?
Typically to your own S3-compatible bucket. The vendor hosts the control plane and catalogue, not necessarily your data.
Portworx Backup: Does it only protect Portworx volumes?
No. It works across Container Storage Interface providers, including cloud provider storage and other vendors' drivers.
CloudCasa: Does it work with Velero?
Yes. It can manage existing Velero installations, which makes it a lower-friction upgrade than a rip and replace.
Portworx Backup: Is it included with Portworx Enterprise?
No. It is a separate licence at 0.20 USD per node hour with its own minimum.
Related pages
More on Portworx Backup
Other head to heads
- CloudCasa vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- CloudCasa vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- CloudCasa vs HYCU
- CloudCasa vs Trilio
- CloudCasa vs Velero
- CloudCasa vs BDRShield
- CloudCasa vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- CloudCasa vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- CloudCasa vs Redstor
- CloudCasa vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- CloudCasa vs Spanning Backup
- CloudCasa vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- CloudCasa vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- CloudCasa vs IBM Storage Protect
- CloudCasa vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- CloudCasa vs Macrium Reflect
- CloudCasa vs Kopia
- CloudCasa vs rustic
- CloudCasa vs Proxmox Backup Server
- CloudCasa vs Datto Backup
- CloudCasa vs HPE StoreOnce
- CloudCasa vs MSP360 Backup
- CloudCasa vs N-able Backup
- CloudCasa vs OwnBackup
- Portworx Backup vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Portworx Backup vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Portworx Backup vs HYCU
- Portworx Backup vs Trilio
- Portworx Backup vs Velero
- Portworx Backup vs BDRShield
- Portworx Backup vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Portworx Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Portworx Backup vs Redstor
- Portworx Backup vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Portworx Backup vs Spanning Backup
- Portworx Backup vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Portworx Backup vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Portworx Backup vs IBM Storage Protect
- Portworx Backup vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Portworx Backup vs Macrium Reflect
- Portworx Backup vs Kopia
- Portworx Backup vs rustic
- Portworx Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Portworx Backup vs Datto Backup
- Portworx Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Portworx Backup vs MSP360 Backup
- Portworx Backup vs N-able Backup
- Portworx Backup vs OwnBackup
