Backup · head to head
Acronis Cyber Protect vs Nasuni

Acronis Cyber Protect
Backup
Integrated backup and cybersecurity protection
- From
- $68/year
- Rated
- -

Nasuni
File Storage
Cloud file storage that keeps the authoritative copy in object storage and caches it at each site
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Acronis Cyber Protect technical support response is slow and inconsistent for resolving issues; Nasuni subscription is based on managed capacity, so cold data that would cost almost nothing in an archive tier keeps paying the full platform rate, and there is limited incentive structure to delete.
- They diverge on capability: Acronis Cyber Protect covers AI-based ransomware protection, Nasuni covers Edge caching appliances.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acronis Cyber Protect and Nasuni actually diverge.
| Attribute | Acronis Cyber Protect | Nasuni |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $68/year | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, Mac, Linux, Cloud, On-premises | Web, Windows, VMware, Hyper-V, AWS, Azure |
| Category | Backup | File Storage |
| Founded | 2003 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acronis Cyber Protect
- AI-based ransomware protection
- Continuous data protection
- Disk cloning
- Universal restore
- Backup validation
- Vulnerability assessments
- Microsoft 365
- Google Workspace
Only in Nasuni
- Edge caching appliances
- Object storage back end
- Continuous versioning
- Global file lock
- Rapid site recovery
- Ransomware detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acronis Cyber Protect
- Data protectionnot Nasuni
- Disaster recoverynot Nasuni
- Business continuitynot Nasuni
- Ransomware protectionnot Nasuni
- Compliancenot Nasuni
Nasuni
- Consolidating file servers across many branch offices onto one namespace without shipping data between sitesnot Acronis Cyber Protect
- Replacing a NAS plus backup plus offsite replication stack with a single recovery modelnot Acronis Cyber Protect
- Engineering or media teams in different regions who need to work on the same large project filesnot Acronis Cyber Protect
- An organisation that has been hit by ransomware on file shares and needs version level rollback rather than tape restoresnot Acronis Cyber Protect
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acronis Cyber Protect
- Technical support response is slow and inconsistent for resolving issues
- UI performance is slow when handling operations like checking backup status or initiating restores
- Backup speed can be slow with limited replication options
- Complex pricing policies with multiple licensing models make cost prediction difficult
- Antivirus engine can significantly impact system performance on client machines
Nasuni
- Subscription is based on managed capacity, so cold data that would cost almost nothing in an archive tier keeps paying the full platform rate, and there is limited incentive structure to delete.
- Every site needs an appliance, virtual or physical, which is a footprint and a patching obligation at locations that previously had only a file server or nothing.
- A read that misses the local cache is fetched from object storage, so the first access to a cold large file is at cloud latency and users experience it as the system being slow at random.
- Global file lock serialises access across regions, so genuinely collaborative editing of the same large files still involves waiting for another site to release the lock rather than merging.
- The object storage underneath is your contract, so API transaction and egress charges from Azure or AWS land on your cloud bill and are not covered by the Nasuni subscription you were quoted against.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acronis Cyber Protect
$68/year- Standard$68/year
- Backup and recovery
- Basic security
- Advanced$129/year
- Enhanced security
- Ransomware protection
- Anti-malware
- Business$5.67/month
- Enterprise features
- Support
- Multiple workloads
Nasuni
On request- Nasuni File Data Platform$undefined/year
- Subscription based on managed capacity
- Edge appliances at each site
- Continuous versioning and rapid recovery
Which should you pick?
Choose Acronis Cyber Protect if
- You need ai-based ransomware protection.
- You work on Windows, Mac, Linux, Cloud, On-premises.
- You also want continuous data protection.
Choose Nasuni if
- You need edge caching appliances.
- You work on Web, Windows, VMware, Hyper-V, AWS, Azure.
- You also want object storage back end.
Questions people ask
- Is Acronis Cyber Protect or Nasuni better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acronis Cyber Protect starts at $68/year and Nasuni at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acronis Cyber Protect or Nasuni?
- Acronis Cyber Protect starts at $68/year and Nasuni at On request.
- Does Acronis Cyber Protect or Nasuni run on more platforms?
- Acronis Cyber Protect runs on Windows, Mac, Linux, Cloud, On-premises. Nasuni runs on Web, Windows, VMware, Hyper-V, AWS, Azure.
- What is Acronis Cyber Protect best used for?
- Acronis Cyber Protect is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Nasuni is typically brought in for.
- What can Acronis Cyber Protect do that Nasuni cannot?
- Acronis Cyber Protect covers AI-based ransomware protection, Continuous data protection, Disk cloning, Universal restore. Nasuni covers Edge caching appliances, Object storage back end, Continuous versioning, Global file lock.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acronis Cyber Protect: What does Acronis Cyber Protect include?
Acronis Cyber Protect combines backup, disaster recovery, next-generation anti-malware, cybersecurity, and endpoint management in a single platform for complete cyber resilience.
SourceNasuni: Do I still need a backup product?
That is the pitch: continuous versioning in object storage replaces the backup schedule for file data. Databases and virtual machines still need their own tooling.
Acronis Cyber Protect: What are the main pricing plans for Acronis Cyber Protect?
Acronis offers Cyber Protect Standard at $68/year, Cyber Protect Advanced at $129+/year for consumers, and business plans at $5.67-$8.60/month. Acronis runs three licensing models: per-workload, per-GB, and solution-based.
SourceNasuni: Who owns the storage account?
You do. Nasuni writes into object storage you contract for, which also means the cloud provider bills you directly for it.
Acronis Cyber Protect: Does Acronis offer an API for integrations?
Yes, Acronis exposes REST APIs allowing partners to integrate existing solutions and create new ones. They provide 300+ pre-built integrations and support both inbound (CyberApps) and outbound API integrations.
SourceNasuni: How fast is recovery of a whole site?
An appliance can be serving files within hours because data is pulled on demand, but performance stays degraded while the cache refills.
Acronis Cyber Protect: Can Acronis Cyber Protect be deployed on-premises?
Yes, Acronis Cyber Protect supports multiple deployment options including on-premises and SaaS, giving organizations flexibility in how they manage their backup and disaster recovery infrastructure.
SourceNasuni: Is pricing published?
No. Nasuni sells through quotes based on managed capacity and site count, so comparisons need a real proposal rather than a list price.
Related pages
More on Acronis Cyber Protect
Other head to heads
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Cohesity
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs IBM Storage Protect
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs HPE StoreOnce
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Spanning Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Borg Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Duplicacy
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Restic
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Altaro VM Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Bacula
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Comet Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs CloudCasa
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Datto Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Kopia
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs MSP360 Backup
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Panzura
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Nextcloud
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs LucidLink
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Zerto
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs VAST Data
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs TrueNAS
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Scality RING
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Carbonite
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Ceph
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs MinIO
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Cloudflare R2
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs pCloud
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Storj
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Sync.com
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Tigris
- Acronis Cyber Protect vs Tresorit
- Nasuni vs Cohesity
- Nasuni vs IBM Storage Protect
- Nasuni vs HPE StoreOnce
- Nasuni vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Nasuni vs Spanning Backup
- Nasuni vs Borg Backup
- Nasuni vs Duplicacy
- Nasuni vs Restic
- Nasuni vs Altaro VM Backup
- Nasuni vs Bacula
- Nasuni vs Comet Backup
- Nasuni vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Nasuni vs CloudCasa
- Nasuni vs Datto Backup
- Nasuni vs Kopia
- Nasuni vs MSP360 Backup
- Nasuni vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Nasuni vs Panzura
- Nasuni vs Nextcloud
- Nasuni vs LucidLink
- Nasuni vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Nasuni vs Zerto
- Nasuni vs VAST Data
- Nasuni vs TrueNAS
- Nasuni vs Scality RING
- Nasuni vs Carbonite
- Nasuni vs Ceph
- Nasuni vs MinIO
- Nasuni vs Cloudflare R2
- Nasuni vs pCloud
- Nasuni vs Storj
- Nasuni vs Sync.com
- Nasuni vs Tigris
- Nasuni vs Tresorit
