File Storage · head to head
Nasuni vs Zerto

Nasuni
File Storage
Cloud file storage that keeps the authoritative copy in object storage and caches it at each site
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nasuni subscription is based on managed capacity, so cold data that would cost almost nothing in an archive tier keeps paying the full platform rate, and there is limited incentive structure to delete.; Zerto zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
- They diverge on capability: Nasuni covers Edge caching appliances, Zerto covers Continuous data protection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nasuni and Zerto actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nasuni
- Edge caching appliances
- Object storage back end
- Continuous versioning
- Global file lock
- Rapid site recovery
- Ransomware detection
Only in Zerto
- Continuous data protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Automated failover
- Non-disruptive testing
- Multi-cloud mobility
- Long-term retention
- VMware
- Hyper-V
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nasuni
- Consolidating file servers across many branch offices onto one namespace without shipping data between sitesnot Zerto
- Replacing a NAS plus backup plus offsite replication stack with a single recovery modelnot Zerto
- Engineering or media teams in different regions who need to work on the same large project filesnot Zerto
- An organisation that has been hit by ransomware on file shares and needs version level rollback rather than tape restoresnot Zerto
Zerto
- Data protectionnot Nasuni
- Disaster recoverynot Nasuni
- Business continuitynot Nasuni
- Ransomware protectionnot Nasuni
- Compliancenot Nasuni
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nasuni
- Subscription is based on managed capacity, so cold data that would cost almost nothing in an archive tier keeps paying the full platform rate, and there is limited incentive structure to delete.
- Every site needs an appliance, virtual or physical, which is a footprint and a patching obligation at locations that previously had only a file server or nothing.
- A read that misses the local cache is fetched from object storage, so the first access to a cold large file is at cloud latency and users experience it as the system being slow at random.
- Global file lock serialises access across regions, so genuinely collaborative editing of the same large files still involves waiting for another site to release the lock rather than merging.
- The object storage underneath is your contract, so API transaction and egress charges from Azure or AWS land on your cloud bill and are not covered by the Nasuni subscription you were quoted against.
Zerto
- Zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
Pricing, plan by plan
Nasuni
On request- Nasuni File Data Platform$undefined/year
- Subscription based on managed capacity
- Edge appliances at each site
- Continuous versioning and rapid recovery
Zerto
$5/month- Zerto Enterprise Cloud$5/month
- Continuous protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Multi-cloud mobility
Which should you pick?
Choose Nasuni if
- You need edge caching appliances.
- You work on Web, Windows, VMware, Hyper-V, AWS, Azure.
- You also want object storage back end.
Choose Zerto if
- You need continuous data protection.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want journal-based recovery.
Questions people ask
- Is Nasuni or Zerto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nasuni starts at On request and Zerto at $5/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nasuni or Zerto?
- Nasuni starts at On request and Zerto at $5/month.
- Does Nasuni or Zerto run on more platforms?
- Nasuni runs on Web, Windows, VMware, Hyper-V, AWS, Azure. Zerto runs on Windows, Linux, Web.
- What is Nasuni best used for?
- Nasuni is most often used for consolidating file servers across many branch offices onto one namespace without shipping data between sites, replacing a nas plus backup plus offsite replication stack with a single recovery model, engineering or media teams in different regions who need to work on the same large project files, an organisation that has been hit by ransomware on file shares and needs version level rollback rather than tape restores. Of those, consolidating file servers across many branch offices onto one namespace without shipping data between sites and replacing a nas plus backup plus offsite replication stack with a single recovery model are not what Zerto is typically brought in for.
- What can Nasuni do that Zerto cannot?
- Nasuni covers Edge caching appliances, Object storage back end, Continuous versioning, Global file lock. Zerto covers Continuous data protection, Journal-based recovery, Automated failover, Non-disruptive testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nasuni: Do I still need a backup product?
That is the pitch: continuous versioning in object storage replaces the backup schedule for file data. Databases and virtual machines still need their own tooling.
Zerto: Can I try Zerto before buying?
Yes, Zerto offers a 14-day free trial or on-demand lab access to test the platform.
SourceNasuni: Who owns the storage account?
You do. Nasuni writes into object storage you contract for, which also means the cloud provider bills you directly for it.
Nasuni: How fast is recovery of a whole site?
An appliance can be serving files within hours because data is pulled on demand, but performance stays degraded while the cache refills.
Nasuni: Is pricing published?
No. Nasuni sells through quotes based on managed capacity and site count, so comparisons need a real proposal rather than a list price.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Nasuni vs Panzura
- Nasuni vs Nextcloud
- Nasuni vs LucidLink
- Nasuni vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Nasuni vs VAST Data
- Nasuni vs TrueNAS
- Nasuni vs Scality RING
- Nasuni vs Carbonite
- Nasuni vs Ceph
- Nasuni vs MinIO
- Nasuni vs Cloudflare R2
- Nasuni vs pCloud
- Nasuni vs Storj
- Nasuni vs Sync.com
- Nasuni vs Tigris
- Nasuni vs Tresorit
- Nasuni vs Barracuda Backup
- Nasuni vs Backblaze
- Nasuni vs Veritas NetBackup
- Nasuni vs CrashPlan
- Nasuni vs IDrive
- Nasuni vs IDrive e2
- Zerto vs Panzura
- Zerto vs Nextcloud
- Zerto vs LucidLink
- Zerto vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Zerto vs VAST Data
- Zerto vs TrueNAS
- Zerto vs Scality RING
- Zerto vs Carbonite
- Zerto vs Ceph
- Zerto vs MinIO
- Zerto vs Cloudflare R2
- Zerto vs pCloud
- Zerto vs Storj
- Zerto vs Sync.com
- Zerto vs Tigris
- Zerto vs Tresorit
- Zerto vs Barracuda Backup
- Zerto vs Backblaze
- Zerto vs Veritas NetBackup
- Zerto vs CrashPlan
- Zerto vs IDrive
- Zerto vs IDrive e2

