Maps · head to head
GraphHopper vs Radar

GraphHopper
Maps
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Radar
Maps
Geofencing, trip tracking, and location-based search APIs that power location features in
- From
- $0.02/per monthly tracked user
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; Radar no free tier available
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and Radar actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | Radar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $0.02/per monthly tracked user |
| Pricing model | freemium | usage-based |
| Platforms | Web | iOS, Android, Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
Nothing recorded that Radar does not also cover.
Only in Radar
Nothing recorded that GraphHopper does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Radar
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Radar
Radar
- Detecting and preventing fraud with geolocation verificationnot GraphHopper
- Tracking pickups and deliveries in real-time with geofencingnot GraphHopper
- Engaging customers with location-based marketing campaignsnot GraphHopper
- Managing geographic compliance and hyper-accurate location trackingnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Radar
- No free tier available
- Annual contracts required with committed monthly quotas
- Volume discounts applied manually; no public discount tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Radar
$0.02/per monthly tracked userNo published plan breakdown. See the Radar review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphHopper if
Nothing in the data separates GraphHopper from Radar on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or Radar better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and Radar at $0.02/per monthly tracked user, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or Radar?
- GraphHopper starts at On request and Radar at $0.02/per monthly tracked user.
- Does GraphHopper or Radar run on more platforms?
- GraphHopper runs on Web. Radar runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what Radar is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphHopper: Is the free plan actually usable for production?
No. The free tier is limited to non-commercial use only and includes 500 daily credits. To use GraphHopper in production, you need a paid plan starting at 69 euros per month.
SourceRadar: What is Radar's core function?
Radar is an all-in-one location platform providing SDKs and APIs for geofencing, trip tracking, geocoding, and location search. It handles 100+ billion annual queries from 100+ million devices.
SourceGraphHopper: What happens if I exceed my daily credit limit?
The page does not specify. Each tier has a daily credit limit (500 for free, 5,000 for Basic, 15,000 for Standard, 50,000 for Premium), but no overage policy is documented.
SourceRadar: Who uses Radar?
Companies like Sleeper, Panera, DICK's Sporting Goods, T-Mobile, and Zillow use Radar's geofencing SDKs and maps APIs for location-based solutions.
SourceGraphHopper: Does GraphHopper offer a trial period?
No. There is no trial period. You can start with the free plan to test, but commercial use requires a paid subscription.
SourceRadar: How is Radar's pricing structured?
Radar does not publicly disclose pricing. Custom quotes are required based on usage and requirements, meaning pricing varies per customer.
SourceGraphHopper: How much does the Premium plan cost and what do I get?
Premium is 479 euros per month and includes 50,000 daily credits, up to 200 locations per request, up to 20 vehicles, email and phone support, and access to all APIs including routing and optimization.
SourceRadar: What are Radar's security and privacy features?
Radar prioritizes enterprise-level security, privacy, and customer support. It maintains high uptime, low latency connections for reliable monitoring of location data across platforms.
SourceGraphHopper: Is there a discount if I link back to GraphHopper?
Yes. A 20% discount is available with proper attribution. The page also mentions a 99.5% uptime SLA on paid plans only.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs OSRM
- GraphHopper vs Ride with GPS
- GraphHopper vs Geoapify
- GraphHopper vs LocationIQ
- GraphHopper vs OpenRouteService
- GraphHopper vs Stadia Maps
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs GRASS GIS
- GraphHopper vs MapTiler
- GraphHopper vs onX Maps
- GraphHopper vs Potree
- GraphHopper vs SW Maps
- GraphHopper vs WhiteboxTools
- GraphHopper vs Agisoft Metashape
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs TomTom Developer Portal
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Felt
- GraphHopper vs Foursquare Places API
- GraphHopper vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- GraphHopper vs Fused
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps
- Radar vs Google Maps Platform
- Radar vs Apple Maps
- Radar vs Mapbox
- Radar vs HERE Technologies
- Radar vs OSRM
- Radar vs Ride with GPS
- Radar vs Geoapify
- Radar vs LocationIQ
- Radar vs OpenRouteService
- Radar vs Stadia Maps
- Radar vs Bing Maps
- Radar vs GRASS GIS
- Radar vs MapTiler
- Radar vs onX Maps
- Radar vs Potree
- Radar vs SW Maps
- Radar vs WhiteboxTools
- Radar vs Agisoft Metashape
- Radar vs Mappedin
- Radar vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Radar vs Esri ArcGIS
- Radar vs CARTO
- Radar vs Felt
- Radar vs Foursquare Places API
- Radar vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Radar vs Fused
- Radar vs Google Maps
