Maps · head to head
ArcGIS Field Maps vs PositionStack

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

PositionStack
Maps
Free, developer-friendly geocoding API for forward and reverse geocoding with global coverage
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money; PositionStack the free plan allows only 100 requests per month
- They diverge on capability: ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, PositionStack covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArcGIS Field Maps and PositionStack actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArcGIS Field Maps | PositionStack |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence | Unknown |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
Only in PositionStack
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot PositionStack
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot PositionStack
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot PositionStack
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot PositionStack
PositionStack
- Forward geocoding addresses to coordinates via REST APInot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Reverse geocoding coordinates to addressesnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Batch geocoding location data in a backend servicenot ArcGIS Field Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
PositionStack
- The free plan allows only 100 requests per month
- The free plan is a personal licence, so commercial use requires a paid plan
- The free plan is rate limited, with an extended rate limit only from the Basic plan up
- Requests beyond the monthly quota are billed as overage, at $0.0003996 per request on Basic
- The lowest advertised rates require annual prepayment
- Enterprise volumes are priced by quote with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
PositionStack
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the PositionStack review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Choose PositionStack if
- You need core functionality.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is ArcGIS Field Maps or PositionStack better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and PositionStack at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArcGIS Field Maps or PositionStack?
- ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and PositionStack at On request.
- Does ArcGIS Field Maps or PositionStack run on more platforms?
- ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. PositionStack runs on Web.
- What is ArcGIS Field Maps best used for?
- ArcGIS Field Maps is most often used for a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys, a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later, an environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external gnss receiver recorded directly against the authoritative dataset, an organisation consolidating from collector, explorer, tracker and workforce onto a single app after esri retired them. Of those, a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys and a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later are not what PositionStack is typically brought in for.
- What can ArcGIS Field Maps do that PositionStack cannot?
- ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing. PositionStack covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
PositionStack: What annual billing discount does Positionstack offer?
Annual billing provides up to 15% discount compared to monthly billing total. For example, Basic annual is $8.99/month vs $9.99/month monthly, and Professional annual is $43.99/month vs $49.99/month monthly. Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
PositionStack: How do Positionstack overage notifications work?
Positionstack sends alerts at 75%, 90%, and 100% of your monthly request allowance. Overages are calculated at month-end and charged according to each tier's per-request rate (e.g., Business tier: $0.00013332/request). Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
PositionStack: What payment methods does Positionstack accept?
Positionstack accepts Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express, Diner's Club for monthly billing. Enterprise customers may arrange bank transfers for their custom agreements. Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
PositionStack: Can I downgrade or cancel my Positionstack plan?
Downgrades take effect at your billing cycle end. Cancellations require contacting customer service. Uptime guarantee is 99.9% average over 12 months. Source: https://positionstack.com/pricing
SourceRelated pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
More on PositionStack
Other head to heads
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs HERE Technologies
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Apple Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs LocationIQ
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Nominatim
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Stadia Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CesiumJS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Ride with GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Atlas.co
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Correlator3D
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Emlid Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- PositionStack vs QGIS
- PositionStack vs SW Maps
- PositionStack vs Felt
- PositionStack vs CARTO
- PositionStack vs Global Mapper
- PositionStack vs GRASS GIS
- PositionStack vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- PositionStack vs Trailforks
- PositionStack vs onX Maps
- PositionStack vs Mapbox
- PositionStack vs Google Maps Platform
- PositionStack vs Leaflet
- PositionStack vs Bing Maps
- PositionStack vs Cesium ion
- PositionStack vs Citymapper
- PositionStack vs Gaia GPS
- PositionStack vs GraphHopper
- PositionStack vs HERE Technologies
- PositionStack vs Apple Maps
- PositionStack vs LocationIQ
- PositionStack vs Nominatim
- PositionStack vs Stadia Maps
- PositionStack vs CesiumJS
- PositionStack vs Ride with GPS
- PositionStack vs Agisoft Metashape
- PositionStack vs Atlas.co
- PositionStack vs Correlator3D
- PositionStack vs Emlid Studio
- PositionStack vs Geographic Calculator
