Maps · head to head
ArcGIS Field Maps vs Polaris Navigation GPS

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Polaris Navigation GPS
Maps
Professional GPS navigation for outdoor professionals
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Polaris Navigation GPS has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- They diverge on capability: ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Polaris Navigation GPS covers Precision GPS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArcGIS Field Maps and Polaris Navigation GPS actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArcGIS Field Maps | Polaris Navigation GPS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2010 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
Only in Polaris Navigation GPS
- Precision GPS
- Multiple coordinate systems
- Waypoint averaging
- Area measurement
- NMEA output
- External GPS receivers
- Bluetooth GPS
- Local data storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot Polaris Navigation GPS
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot Polaris Navigation GPS
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot Polaris Navigation GPS
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot Polaris Navigation GPS
Polaris Navigation GPS
- Land surveyingnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Search and rescuenot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Geocachingnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field data collectionnot ArcGIS Field Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
Polaris Navigation GPS
Nothing recorded yet. See the Polaris Navigation GPS review.
Pricing, plan by plan
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
Polaris Navigation GPS
Free- FreeFree
- Basic GPS tracking
- Waypoint management
- Multiple coordinate formats
- Pro$5.99/one-time
- NMEA output
- External GPS support
- Waypoint averaging
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Choose Polaris Navigation GPS if
- You need precision gps.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Android.
- You also want multiple coordinate systems.
Questions people ask
- Is ArcGIS Field Maps or Polaris Navigation GPS better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and Polaris Navigation GPS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArcGIS Field Maps or Polaris Navigation GPS?
- Polaris Navigation GPS has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for ArcGIS Field Maps and Free for Polaris Navigation GPS.
- Does ArcGIS Field Maps or Polaris Navigation GPS run on more platforms?
- ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. Polaris Navigation GPS runs on Android.
- Can I use Polaris Navigation GPS for free?
- Yes. Polaris Navigation GPS has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request.
- What is ArcGIS Field Maps best used for?
- ArcGIS Field Maps is most often used for a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys, a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later, an environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external gnss receiver recorded directly against the authoritative dataset, an organisation consolidating from collector, explorer, tracker and workforce onto a single app after esri retired them. Of those, a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys and a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later are not what Polaris Navigation GPS is typically brought in for.
- What can ArcGIS Field Maps do that Polaris Navigation GPS cannot?
- ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing. Polaris Navigation GPS covers Precision GPS, Multiple coordinate systems, Waypoint averaging, Area measurement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
ArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
More on Polaris Navigation GPS
Other head to heads
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs HERE Technologies
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Apple Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs AllTrails
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leica Infinity
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs LocationIQ
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mappedin
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs MapTiler
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Potree
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs WhiteboxTools
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs QGIS
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs SW Maps
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Felt
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs CARTO
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Global Mapper
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs GRASS GIS
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Trailforks
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs onX Maps
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Mapbox
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Google Maps Platform
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Leaflet
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Bing Maps
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Cesium ion
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Citymapper
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Gaia GPS
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs GraphHopper
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs HERE Technologies
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Apple Maps
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs AllTrails
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Leica Infinity
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs LocationIQ
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Agisoft Metashape
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Mappedin
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs MapTiler
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs Potree
- Polaris Navigation GPS vs WhiteboxTools
