Maps · head to head
ArcGIS Field Maps vs OSRM

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
OSRM
Maps
High-performance open-source routing engine designed for OpenStreetMap data, providing fast route calculations
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OSRM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money; OSRM free and open source routing engine under the 2-clause BSD license, no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, OSRM covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArcGIS Field Maps and OSRM actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArcGIS Field Maps | OSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
Only in OSRM
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot OSRM
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot OSRM
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot OSRM
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot OSRM
OSRM
- Calculating efficient delivery routes across continental-sized road networks in millisecondsnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Building navigation features for mobile apps without constructing routing infrastructurenot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Customizing route optimization for car, bicycle, and pedestrian transportation modesnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Integrating OpenStreetMap data for real-time routing in web applicationsnot ArcGIS Field Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
OSRM
- Free and open source routing engine under the 2-clause BSD license, no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
OSRM
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the OSRM review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Choose OSRM if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is ArcGIS Field Maps or OSRM better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and OSRM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArcGIS Field Maps or OSRM?
- OSRM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for ArcGIS Field Maps and Free for OSRM.
- Does ArcGIS Field Maps or OSRM run on more platforms?
- ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. OSRM runs on Web.
- Can I use OSRM for free?
- Yes. OSRM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request.
- What is ArcGIS Field Maps best used for?
- ArcGIS Field Maps is most often used for a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys, a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later, an environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external gnss receiver recorded directly against the authoritative dataset, an organisation consolidating from collector, explorer, tracker and workforce onto a single app after esri retired them. Of those, a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys and a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later are not what OSRM is typically brought in for.
- What can ArcGIS Field Maps do that OSRM cannot?
- ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing. OSRM covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
OSRM: How much does Project OSRM cost?
Project OSRM is completely free and open source, distributed under the permissive 2-clause BSD license with no licensing costs or fees.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs HERE Technologies
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Apple Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Stadia Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Ride with GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Nominatim
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs OpenLayers
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs OpenRouteService
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs OsmAnd
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs IndoorAtlas
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs HERE WeGo
- OSRM vs QGIS
- OSRM vs SW Maps
- OSRM vs Felt
- OSRM vs CARTO
- OSRM vs Global Mapper
- OSRM vs GRASS GIS
- OSRM vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- OSRM vs Trailforks
- OSRM vs onX Maps
- OSRM vs Mapbox
- OSRM vs Google Maps Platform
- OSRM vs Leaflet
- OSRM vs Bing Maps
- OSRM vs Cesium ion
- OSRM vs Citymapper
- OSRM vs Gaia GPS
- OSRM vs GraphHopper
- OSRM vs HERE Technologies
- OSRM vs Apple Maps
- OSRM vs Stadia Maps
- OSRM vs Ride with GPS
- OSRM vs Nominatim
- OSRM vs OpenLayers
- OSRM vs OpenRouteService
- OSRM vs OsmAnd
- OSRM vs ArcGIS Survey123
- OSRM vs IndoorAtlas
- OSRM vs HERE WeGo
