Construction · head to head
Buildots vs Egnyte

Buildots
Construction
Hard hat mounted 360 cameras and computer vision that score build progress against the BIM model
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Egnyte
Construction
Cloud-based file management and collaboration platform
- From
- $60/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Buildots tracking depends on a BIM model maintained at construction level of detail; on a job where the model is stale or was never built for coordination, the comparison degrades and much of the value disappears.; Egnyte storage is allocated per plan rather than per user, at 100 GB on Business and 150 GB on every tier above it
- They diverge on capability: Buildots covers Hard hat 360 capture, Egnyte covers File sync and sharing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buildots and Egnyte actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Buildots
- Hard hat 360 capture
- Model to as-built comparison
- Per activity progress scoring
- Programme deviation alerts
- Delay forecasting
- Visual evidence trail
- Subcontractor performance reporting
Only in Egnyte
- File sync and sharing
- Team collaboration
- Mobile access
- Version control
- Access controls
- Microsoft 365
- Slack
- Box
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buildots
- A residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle timenot Egnyte
- A hospital or data centre fit-out where MEP first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every monthnot Egnyte
- A developer that wants independent progress evidence before certifying an interim payment applicationnot Egnyte
- A contractor building a production rate history across projects so future programmes are based on measured output rather than assumptionnot Egnyte
Egnyte
- Managing and syncing files across an organisation with governance controlsnot Buildots
- Sharing large project files with external collaboratorsnot Buildots
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buildots
- Tracking depends on a BIM model maintained at construction level of detail; on a job where the model is stale or was never built for coordination, the comparison degrades and much of the value disappears.
- The data only arrives if someone walks the site every week with the camera, so coverage decays quietly when the site team is under pressure, exactly when the reporting is most needed.
- Pricing is per project rather than per seat and includes hardware, so a contractor cannot roll it out cheaply across a portfolio of small jobs and it is uneconomic below a certain project value.
- It reads interior fit-out and repetitive vertical work far better than structure, groundworks or external envelope, so a large fraction of a project's programme is outside what it can score.
- Making progress objective creates commercial friction with subcontractors whose valuations have historically been negotiated, and contractors who deploy it without addressing that in the subcontract get pushback rather than adoption.
Egnyte
- Storage is allocated per plan rather than per user, at 100 GB on Business and 150 GB on every tier above it
- That means Elite at $48 per user per month carries the same 150 GB as Enterprise Lite at $39
- The Business plan caps the account at 100 power users, so growth past that forces a jump to $39 per user
- Every published price requires annual payment
- The Ultimate tier is quoted rather than listed
Pricing, plan by plan
Buildots
On request- Buildots$undefined/year
- Priced per project by size and duration
- Camera hardware included in the engagement
- Model onboarding and setup quoted separately
Egnyte
$60/month- Team Collaboration$60/month
- File sync and sharing
- Team collaboration
- Mobile access
- EnterpriseFree
- Advanced governance
- Compliance controls
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Buildots if
- You need hard hat 360 capture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want model to as-built comparison.
Choose Egnyte if
- You need file sync and sharing.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Windows.
- You also want team collaboration.
Questions people ask
- Is Buildots or Egnyte better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buildots starts at On request and Egnyte at $60/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buildots or Egnyte?
- Buildots starts at On request and Egnyte at $60/month.
- Does Buildots or Egnyte run on more platforms?
- Buildots runs on Web, iOS, Android. Egnyte runs on Web, Ios, Android, Windows.
- What is Buildots best used for?
- Buildots is most often used for a residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle time, a hospital or data centre fit-out where mep first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every month, a developer that wants independent progress evidence before certifying an interim payment application, a contractor building a production rate history across projects so future programmes are based on measured output rather than assumption. Of those, a residential tower where the same fit-out sequence repeats on forty floors and the contractor wants an objective read on cycle time and a hospital or data centre fit-out where mep first fix progress is disputed between the main contractor and trades every month are not what Egnyte is typically brought in for.
- What can Buildots do that Egnyte cannot?
- Buildots covers Hard hat 360 capture, Model to as-built comparison, Per activity progress scoring, Programme deviation alerts. Egnyte covers File sync and sharing, Team collaboration, Mobile access, Version control.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buildots: What does Buildots cost?
It is quoted per project based on size, duration and scope, with camera hardware included. Nothing is published.
Egnyte: How much does Egnyte cost per user?
Egnyte pricing ranges from $22 per user per month (Business plan, paid annually) to $48 per user per month (Elite plan, paid annually). The Ultimate plan requires a custom quote. Enterprise Lite is $39 per user per month.
SourceBuildots: Do I need a BIM model?
Yes. The system scores progress by comparing captured conditions against model objects, so the model quality sets the ceiling on accuracy.
Egnyte: What storage limits apply to each Egnyte plan?
Business plan includes 100 GB per account and supports up to 100 users. Enterprise Lite, Elite, and Ultimate plans include 150 GB per account each with support for unlimited users.
SourceBuildots: What kind of projects suit it?
Repetitive vertical work with heavy interior fit-out. Civil, groundworks and external envelope are poorly covered.
Egnyte: Are there additional costs for Egnyte add-ons?
Yes. Project Hub costs $6 per user per month, Specialized File Handler costs $6 per user per month, and Snapshot & Recovery costs $10 per user per month.
SourceBuildots: Who does the site walks?
Your own site team, typically once or twice a week. There is no Buildots operator on site.
Egnyte: Does Egnyte offer a free trial?
Egnyte offers a free trial for all tiers except Ultimate. The Ultimate tier requires contacting sales. Multi-year discounts are available but specific terms are not detailed on the pricing page.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Buildots vs Openspace
- Buildots vs Procore
- Buildots vs Reconstruct
- Buildots vs Dalux
- Buildots vs RIB CostX
- Buildots vs Autodesk Revit
- Buildots vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Buildots vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Buildots vs Togal.AI
- Buildots vs BricsCAD BIM
- Buildots vs Cubit Estimating
- Buildots vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Buildots vs Viewpoint Vista
- Buildots vs Briq
- Buildots vs Buildertrend
- Buildots vs ConstructConnect
- Buildots vs BuildingConnected
- Buildots vs SketchUp
- Buildots vs ArchiCAD
- Buildots vs Kahua
- Buildots vs e-Builder
- Buildots vs Bluebeam Revu
- Buildots vs Smartsheet Construction
- Buildots vs eSUB
- Buildots vs InEight
- Buildots vs Oracle Aconex
- Buildots vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Buildots vs Adaptive
- Buildots vs Trimble Pay
- Buildots vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Egnyte vs Openspace
- Egnyte vs Procore
- Egnyte vs Reconstruct
- Egnyte vs Dalux
- Egnyte vs RIB CostX
- Egnyte vs Autodesk Revit
- Egnyte vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Egnyte vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Egnyte vs Togal.AI
- Egnyte vs BricsCAD BIM
- Egnyte vs Cubit Estimating
- Egnyte vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Egnyte vs Viewpoint Vista
- Egnyte vs Briq
- Egnyte vs Buildertrend
- Egnyte vs ConstructConnect
- Egnyte vs BuildingConnected
- Egnyte vs SketchUp
- Egnyte vs ArchiCAD
- Egnyte vs Kahua
- Egnyte vs e-Builder
- Egnyte vs Bluebeam Revu
- Egnyte vs Smartsheet Construction
- Egnyte vs eSUB
- Egnyte vs InEight
- Egnyte vs Oracle Aconex
- Egnyte vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Egnyte vs Adaptive
- Egnyte vs Trimble Pay
- Egnyte vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
