Construction · head to head
Foundation Software vs On-Screen Takeoff

Foundation Software
Construction
Job cost accounting and construction payroll for contractors running certified and union jobs
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

On-Screen Takeoff
Construction
Digital quantity takeoff from drawings, now subscription only and bundled rather than sold alone
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Foundation Software no pricing is published anywhere, so shortlisting requires sitting through a sales process before you know whether the product is within budget at all.; On-Screen Takeoff perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- They diverge on capability: Foundation Software covers Job costing, On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Foundation Software and On-Screen Takeoff actually diverge.
| Attribute | Foundation Software | On-Screen Takeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | Windows |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Foundation Software
- Job costing
- Certified payroll
- Union payroll
- AIA billing
- Equipment costing
- Service dispatch
- Mobile time entry
- Executive dashboards
Only in On-Screen Takeoff
- Drawing takeoff
- Revision overlay
- Condition libraries
- Automatic scaling
- Bid zones and phases
- Quick Bid handoff
- Excel export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Foundation Software
- A union electrical or mechanical contractor whose payroll spans several trades and fringe schedules in the same weeknot On-Screen Takeoff
- A general contractor bidding federally funded work that requires weekly certified payroll filingsnot On-Screen Takeoff
- A contractor whose QuickBooks file has outgrown job costing and who is reconciling work in progress in spreadsheetsnot On-Screen Takeoff
- A firm with owned plant that needs equipment hours costed back to jobs to see true contract marginnot On-Screen Takeoff
On-Screen Takeoff
- A drywall contractor measuring wall area and openings across a 300 sheet set where manual takeoff would take a weeknot Foundation Software
- An estimator who receives a late addendum and needs to know which rooms changed rather than re-measuring the whole floornot Foundation Software
- A flooring subcontractor maintaining reusable conditions with waste factors so quantities and material orders stay consistent between estimatorsnot Foundation Software
- A trade contractor that wants takeoff quantities split by phase so progress billing matches the way work is actually releasednot Foundation Software
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Foundation Software
- No pricing is published anywhere, so shortlisting requires sitting through a sales process before you know whether the product is within budget at all.
- Implementation, data conversion and training are billed separately from the licence and routinely run into five figures, which buyers comparing monthly software subscriptions do not budget for.
- The payroll compliance engine is built for United States federal and state law, so the product has essentially no value to contractors outside the US.
- The interface is a long-lived Windows-style application, and staff hired from cloud-native tools find it slow to learn compared with Buildertrend or Procore.
- Project management, document control and field collaboration are weaker than the dedicated construction platforms, so most sites end up running Foundation for money and something else for the job, and paying twice.
On-Screen Takeoff
- Perpetual licensing is no longer offered on current releases, so long-standing users who paid once now face a recurring annual cost they never budgeted, and staying on an old version means no support for newer PDF formats
- ConstructConnect does not publish a price, and the product is increasingly sold inside a bundle with lead data and estimating, so buyers who want takeoff alone often find the quote priced around a package they do not need
- It is Windows desktop only, with no macOS version and no meaningful browser or tablet workflow, which rules it out for firms standardised on Apple hardware
- The interface has changed little in years and estimators coming from browser-based tools find the condition setup and layer management slow to learn, so onboarding a new estimator takes longer than the software cost would suggest
- ConstructConnect sells lead data, takeoff and estimating as a portfolio and has consolidated several acquired products, so a buyer committing to On-Screen Takeoff should ask directly where it sits against the newer cloud takeoff products in the same portfolio
Pricing, plan by plan
Foundation Software
On request- FOUNDATION$undefined/year
- Modular licensing, priced by modules and user count
- Cloud hosted or installed on your own server
- Separate one-off implementation, data conversion and training fee
On-Screen Takeoff
On request- On-Screen Takeoff$undefined/year
- Annual subscription per seat on version 4 and later
- Sold increasingly as part of a ConstructConnect takeoff and estimating bundle
- Perpetual licensing not offered on current releases
Which should you pick?
Choose Foundation Software if
- You need job costing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want certified payroll.
Choose On-Screen Takeoff if
- You need drawing takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want revision overlay.
Questions people ask
- Is Foundation Software or On-Screen Takeoff better?
- Neither clearly leads. Foundation Software starts at On request and On-Screen Takeoff at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Foundation Software or On-Screen Takeoff?
- Foundation Software starts at On request and On-Screen Takeoff at On request.
- Does Foundation Software or On-Screen Takeoff run on more platforms?
- Foundation Software runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. On-Screen Takeoff runs on Windows.
- What is Foundation Software best used for?
- Foundation Software is most often used for a union electrical or mechanical contractor whose payroll spans several trades and fringe schedules in the same week, a general contractor bidding federally funded work that requires weekly certified payroll filings, a contractor whose quickbooks file has outgrown job costing and who is reconciling work in progress in spreadsheets, a firm with owned plant that needs equipment hours costed back to jobs to see true contract margin. Of those, a union electrical or mechanical contractor whose payroll spans several trades and fringe schedules in the same week and a general contractor bidding federally funded work that requires weekly certified payroll filings are not what On-Screen Takeoff is typically brought in for.
- What can Foundation Software do that On-Screen Takeoff cannot?
- Foundation Software covers Job costing, Certified payroll, Union payroll, AIA billing. On-Screen Takeoff covers Drawing takeoff, Revision overlay, Condition libraries, Automatic scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Foundation Software: How much does Foundation Software cost?
The vendor publishes no rates. Pricing is assembled per contractor from module selection and user count, with a separate implementation fee, and is only given after a discovery call.
On-Screen Takeoff: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
No. Current releases are annual subscription. Older perpetual licences continue to run but do not receive updates.
Foundation Software: Does it replace Procore?
No. Foundation is the accounting and payroll system; Procore is project management. They integrate, and many contractors run both.
On-Screen Takeoff: Is it sold separately from Quick Bid?
It can be, but ConstructConnect increasingly quotes it as part of a takeoff and estimating package. Ask explicitly for standalone pricing if that is what you want.
Foundation Software: Can it handle certified payroll for multiple states?
Yes, it produces state-specific certified payroll formats as well as the federal WH-347, which is the main reason multi-state contractors buy it.
On-Screen Takeoff: Does it run on a Mac?
Not natively. It is a Windows application and Mac users run it under virtualisation, which is unsupported in practice for large drawing sets.
Foundation Software: Is there a cloud version?
Yes, it is offered hosted as well as on-premise, but the hosted version is the same application delivered remotely rather than a rebuilt browser product.
On-Screen Takeoff: Will it read a scanned drawing?
Yes, but measurement accuracy on a scanned raster set depends entirely on the scan quality and on setting scale from a verified dimension.
Related pages
More on Foundation Software
More on On-Screen Takeoff
Other head to heads
- Foundation Software vs Adaptive
- Foundation Software vs Siteline
- Foundation Software vs Kojo
- Foundation Software vs Sage 300 Construction
- Foundation Software vs GCPay
- Foundation Software vs Procore
- Foundation Software vs Briq
- Foundation Software vs HCSS
- Foundation Software vs CMiC
- Foundation Software vs Jonas Premier
- Foundation Software vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Foundation Software vs Topcon MAGNET
- Foundation Software vs Trunk Tools
- Foundation Software vs Microsoft Project
- Foundation Software vs Egnyte
- Foundation Software vs Fieldwire
- Foundation Software vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Foundation Software vs Bluebeam Revu
- Foundation Software vs Sage Estimating
- Foundation Software vs RIB CostX
- Foundation Software vs Cubit Estimating
- Foundation Software vs Togal.AI
- Foundation Software vs B2W Estimate
- Foundation Software vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Foundation Software vs Handoff
- Foundation Software vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Foundation Software vs Revit
- Foundation Software vs Smartsheet
- Foundation Software vs Vectorworks Architect
- Foundation Software vs Viewpoint Vista
- Foundation Software vs BricsCAD BIM
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Adaptive
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Siteline
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Kojo
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Sage 300 Construction
- On-Screen Takeoff vs GCPay
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Procore
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Briq
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS
- On-Screen Takeoff vs CMiC
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Jonas Premier
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Topcon MAGNET
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Trunk Tools
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Microsoft Project
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Egnyte
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Fieldwire
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Bluebeam Revu
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Sage Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs RIB CostX
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Cubit Estimating
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Togal.AI
- On-Screen Takeoff vs B2W Estimate
- On-Screen Takeoff vs STACK Construction Technologies
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Handoff
- On-Screen Takeoff vs HCSS HeavyBid
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Revit
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Smartsheet
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Vectorworks Architect
- On-Screen Takeoff vs Viewpoint Vista
- On-Screen Takeoff vs BricsCAD BIM
