Construction · head to head
B2W Estimate vs Reconstruct

B2W Estimate
Construction
Heavy civil estimating and bidding built on crew, equipment and production rates rather than unit prices
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Reconstruct
Construction
Reality capture and progress tracking that aligns site imagery to the model and the schedule
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: B2W Estimate pricing is not published anywhere, and the quote depends on estimator seats plus which of the four other B2W modules you take, so like-for-like comparison with HeavyBid or spreadsheets is impossible without going through a sales cycle; Reconstruct pricing is quoted with nothing published, so a buyer cannot sanity-check a proposal against a list rate and has no way to know whether the price scales with projects, square footage or users until deep in the sales process.
- They diverge on capability: B2W Estimate covers Production-rate estimating, Reconstruct covers Device-agnostic capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which B2W Estimate and Reconstruct actually diverge.
| Attribute | B2W Estimate | Reconstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in B2W Estimate
- Production-rate estimating
- Central resource database
- Concurrent bidding
- DOT bid file export
- Alternates and addenda
- Field feedback loop
- Bid analysis
Only in Reconstruct
- Device-agnostic capture
- Photogrammetry and mesh generation
- 4D schedule alignment
- Design overlay
- Time slider
- Measurement tools
- Issue tracking
- Remote walkthrough
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
B2W Estimate
- A grading contractor bids a 40 million dollar DOT job and needs to test three crew configurations against the same quantities before the bid deadlinenot Reconstruct
- A utility contractor wants the production rates used in the winning bid pushed into field logging so the superintendent is measured against the estimatenot Reconstruct
- An estimating department with four estimators needs several people working on separate sections of one bid without merging spreadsheets by handnot Reconstruct
- A contractor moving off HeavyBid wants a resource database it can reuse across estimating, dispatch and fleet maintenancenot Reconstruct
Reconstruct
- A general contractor whose monthly progress claim is regularly challenged by the owner, needing dated visual evidence tied to schedule activities rather than a folder of photosnot B2W Estimate
- An owner running projects in several countries who wants to cut executive site visits without accepting the contractor’s self-reported percentage completenot B2W Estimate
- A healthcare or data centre fit-out where above-ceiling services must be recorded before they are closed up, so later maintenance does not require demolitionnot B2W Estimate
- A delay or defect dispute where the decisive question is what was physically in place on a specific date and the only other evidence is contested emailnot B2W Estimate
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
B2W Estimate
- Pricing is not published anywhere, and the quote depends on estimator seats plus which of the four other B2W modules you take, so like-for-like comparison with HeavyBid or spreadsheets is impossible without going through a sales cycle
- The system is worthless until your own crews, equipment and production rates are loaded, which is typically several months of a senior estimator's time before the first bid comes out
- It is aimed squarely at heavy civil self-performing work, so a general contractor whose bids are mostly subcontractor quotes gets very little from the production-rate engine
- The Trimble acquisition means the product now competes internally with other Trimble civil estimating assets, and buyers should ask directly about the long term roadmap for overlapping products before signing a multi-year term
- Reporting outside the Inform module is limited, so organisations that want bid analytics across years typically end up buying another module or extracting to a warehouse
Reconstruct
- Pricing is quoted with nothing published, so a buyer cannot sanity-check a proposal against a list rate and has no way to know whether the price scales with projects, square footage or users until deep in the sales process.
- The whole value depends on disciplined recurring capture, and site teams treat walking the building with a camera as a low-priority chore, so datasets go stale exactly when a dispute makes them valuable.
- Photogrammetry from handheld footage is less accurate than laser scanning, so it is fine for progress and coordination but should not be relied on for tight as-built tolerances or prefabrication dimensions.
- Schedule alignment requires a well-structured schedule with activities that map to physical locations; on projects where the programme is a coarse rolled-up bar chart the progress calculation is close to meaningless.
- It is another platform alongside Procore or Autodesk Construction Cloud rather than a replacement, so buyers add a subscription and a workflow rather than consolidating one, and the business case has to survive that.
Pricing, plan by plan
B2W Estimate
On request- B2W Estimate$undefined/year
- Priced per estimator seat with a separate server or hosting component
- Additional B2W modules quoted separately
- Implementation and resource database setup billed as a project
Reconstruct
On request- Reconstruct$undefined/year
- Quoted per project or per portfolio
- Unlimited capture devices
- 4D schedule alignment
Which should you pick?
Choose B2W Estimate if
- You need production-rate estimating.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want central resource database.
Choose Reconstruct if
- You need device-agnostic capture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want photogrammetry and mesh generation.
Questions people ask
- Is B2W Estimate or Reconstruct better?
- Neither clearly leads. B2W Estimate starts at On request and Reconstruct at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, B2W Estimate or Reconstruct?
- B2W Estimate starts at On request and Reconstruct at On request.
- Does B2W Estimate or Reconstruct run on more platforms?
- B2W Estimate runs on Windows, Web. Reconstruct runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is B2W Estimate best used for?
- B2W Estimate is most often used for a grading contractor bids a 40 million dollar dot job and needs to test three crew configurations against the same quantities before the bid deadline, a utility contractor wants the production rates used in the winning bid pushed into field logging so the superintendent is measured against the estimate, an estimating department with four estimators needs several people working on separate sections of one bid without merging spreadsheets by hand, a contractor moving off heavybid wants a resource database it can reuse across estimating, dispatch and fleet maintenance. Of those, a grading contractor bids a 40 million dollar dot job and needs to test three crew configurations against the same quantities before the bid deadline and a utility contractor wants the production rates used in the winning bid pushed into field logging so the superintendent is measured against the estimate are not what Reconstruct is typically brought in for.
- What can B2W Estimate do that Reconstruct cannot?
- B2W Estimate covers Production-rate estimating, Central resource database, Concurrent bidding, DOT bid file export. Reconstruct covers Device-agnostic capture, Photogrammetry and mesh generation, 4D schedule alignment, Design overlay.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
B2W Estimate: Is B2W Estimate still sold under its own name?
Yes. Trimble acquired B2W in 2022 and continues to sell it as B2W Estimate within the Trimble Construction portfolio.
Reconstruct: How much does Reconstruct cost?
Not published. It is quoted per project or portfolio. Ask specifically whether the price scales by project count, square footage or capture volume, because those give very different totals.
B2W Estimate: Is there a perpetual licence?
Current sales are subscription based. Existing perpetual customers have been migrated toward subscription, so treat a perpetual arrangement as something to negotiate rather than assume.
Reconstruct: Do we need a drone or a laser scanner?
No. It works from 360 cameras and even smartphone video. Drones and scanners improve exterior and accuracy-critical coverage.
B2W Estimate: How does it compare with HeavyBid?
Both are production-rate estimators for heavy civil. B2W's argument is the shared resource database across estimating, field tracking, dispatch and maintenance; HeavyBid's is depth of bidding features and a large installed base in highway work.
Reconstruct: How accurate is it?
Accurate enough for progress, coordination and dispute evidence. It is not a substitute for survey-grade laser scanning where tolerances matter.
B2W Estimate: Does it work for building construction?
Poorly. It assumes self-performed work priced by crew output. Vertical builders bidding mostly subcontracted scopes should look elsewhere.
Reconstruct: Who owns the captured data at closeout?
The customer. Confirm the export format and retention terms in the contract before handover, because a reality archive is only useful if you can still open it in five years.
Reconstruct: Does it replace Procore?
No. It integrates with Procore and Autodesk Construction Cloud and adds the visual as-built layer.
Related pages
More on B2W Estimate
More on Reconstruct
Other head to heads
- B2W Estimate vs PlanSwift
- B2W Estimate vs Sage Estimating
- B2W Estimate vs Procore
- B2W Estimate vs HCSS HeavyBid
- B2W Estimate vs HCSS
- B2W Estimate vs Cubit Estimating
- B2W Estimate vs Handoff
- B2W Estimate vs On-Screen Takeoff
- B2W Estimate vs RIB CostX
- B2W Estimate vs STACK Construction Technologies
- B2W Estimate vs Builderbox
- B2W Estimate vs Togal.AI
- B2W Estimate vs Fieldwire
- B2W Estimate vs Primavera P6
- B2W Estimate vs Raken
- B2W Estimate vs Revit
- B2W Estimate vs Smartsheet
- B2W Estimate vs Vectorworks Architect
- B2W Estimate vs Dalux
- B2W Estimate vs Skydio Dock for X10
- B2W Estimate vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- B2W Estimate vs Buildots
- B2W Estimate vs Propeller Aero
- B2W Estimate vs Openspace
- B2W Estimate vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- B2W Estimate vs Trunk Tools
- B2W Estimate vs Briq
- B2W Estimate vs Buildertrend
- B2W Estimate vs ConstructConnect
- B2W Estimate vs BuildingConnected
- Reconstruct vs PlanSwift
- Reconstruct vs Sage Estimating
- Reconstruct vs Procore
- Reconstruct vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Reconstruct vs HCSS
- Reconstruct vs Cubit Estimating
- Reconstruct vs Handoff
- Reconstruct vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Reconstruct vs RIB CostX
- Reconstruct vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Reconstruct vs Builderbox
- Reconstruct vs Togal.AI
- Reconstruct vs Fieldwire
- Reconstruct vs Primavera P6
- Reconstruct vs Raken
- Reconstruct vs Revit
- Reconstruct vs Smartsheet
- Reconstruct vs Vectorworks Architect
- Reconstruct vs Dalux
- Reconstruct vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Reconstruct vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Reconstruct vs Buildots
- Reconstruct vs Propeller Aero
- Reconstruct vs Openspace
- Reconstruct vs Oracle Primavera Unifier
- Reconstruct vs Trunk Tools
- Reconstruct vs Briq
- Reconstruct vs Buildertrend
- Reconstruct vs ConstructConnect
- Reconstruct vs BuildingConnected
