Construction · head to head
B2W Estimate vs RIB CostX

B2W Estimate
Construction
Heavy civil estimating and bidding built on crew, equipment and production rates rather than unit prices
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

RIB CostX
Construction
2D and BIM quantity takeoff with live-linked estimating workbooks for quantity surveyors and estimators
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: B2W Estimate pricing is not published anywhere, and the quote depends on estimator seats plus which of the four other B2W modules you take, so like-for-like comparison with HeavyBid or spreadsheets is impossible without going through a sales cycle; RIB CostX pricing is not published anywhere and is quoted per package and per seat through regional resellers, so two firms of similar size routinely pay materially different rates for the same configuration.
- They diverge on capability: B2W Estimate covers Production-rate estimating, RIB CostX covers 2D drawing takeoff.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which B2W Estimate and RIB CostX actually diverge.
| Attribute | B2W Estimate | RIB CostX |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web | Windows |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in B2W Estimate
- Production-rate estimating
- Central resource database
- Concurrent bidding
- DOT bid file export
- Alternates and addenda
- Field feedback loop
- Bid analysis
Only in RIB CostX
- 2D drawing takeoff
- BIM and 3D takeoff
- Live-linked workbooks
- Drawing revision comparison
- Bill of quantities production
- Rate libraries
- Subcontractor comparison
- CostX Viewer
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
B2W Estimate
- A grading contractor bids a 40 million dollar DOT job and needs to test three crew configurations against the same quantities before the bid deadlinenot RIB CostX
- A utility contractor wants the production rates used in the winning bid pushed into field logging so the superintendent is measured against the estimatenot RIB CostX
- An estimating department with four estimators needs several people working on separate sections of one bid without merging spreadsheets by handnot RIB CostX
- A contractor moving off HeavyBid wants a resource database it can reuse across estimating, dispatch and fleet maintenancenot RIB CostX
RIB CostX
- A quantity surveying practice that must issue a formatted bill of quantities under NRM or SMM7 and cannot do so from a generic takeoff toolnot B2W Estimate
- A contractor tendering a job where the client reissues drawings mid-tender, needing revision comparison so only changed areas are remeasurednot B2W Estimate
- An estimating department moving from paper and Excel to model-based measurement while keeping the same rate library and bill structurenot B2W Estimate
- A cost consultant producing early-stage elemental cost plans from partial models, then refining the same workbook as design detail arrivesnot B2W Estimate
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
B2W Estimate
- Pricing is not published anywhere, and the quote depends on estimator seats plus which of the four other B2W modules you take, so like-for-like comparison with HeavyBid or spreadsheets is impossible without going through a sales cycle
- The system is worthless until your own crews, equipment and production rates are loaded, which is typically several months of a senior estimator's time before the first bid comes out
- It is aimed squarely at heavy civil self-performing work, so a general contractor whose bids are mostly subcontractor quotes gets very little from the production-rate engine
- The Trimble acquisition means the product now competes internally with other Trimble civil estimating assets, and buyers should ask directly about the long term roadmap for overlapping products before signing a multi-year term
- Reporting outside the Inform module is limited, so organisations that want bid analytics across years typically end up buying another module or extracting to a warehouse
RIB CostX
- Pricing is not published anywhere and is quoted per package and per seat through regional resellers, so two firms of similar size routinely pay materially different rates for the same configuration.
- It is Windows desktop software with heavy graphics demands; there is no meaningful macOS or browser option, which rules it out for practices standardised on Apple hardware.
- The learning curve is steep enough that firms typically budget formal training, and an estimator productive in a rival tool takes weeks rather than days to reach the same output here.
- RIB is owned by Schneider Electric, whose strategic interest is the wider RIB construction cloud, so a buyer choosing CostX today is betting on continued investment in a desktop estimating product inside a group focused elsewhere.
- BIM takeoff is only as good as the model, and on projects where the model is modelled for coordination rather than measurement the automatic quantities need enough manual checking that the time saving largely disappears.
Pricing, plan by plan
B2W Estimate
On request- B2W Estimate$undefined/year
- Priced per estimator seat with a separate server or hosting component
- Additional B2W modules quoted separately
- Implementation and resource database setup billed as a project
RIB CostX
On request- CostX Quantify$undefined/year
- 2D and BIM takeoff
- Measurement export
- No integrated estimating workbook
- CostX Core$undefined/year
- Takeoff plus live-linked workbooks
- Rate libraries
- Standard reporting
- CostX Complete$undefined/year
- Full BIM takeoff
- Advanced workbooks and bills of quantities
- Subcontractor comparison
Which should you pick?
Choose B2W Estimate if
- You need production-rate estimating.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want central resource database.
Choose RIB CostX if
- You need 2d drawing takeoff.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want bim and 3d takeoff.
Questions people ask
- Is B2W Estimate or RIB CostX better?
- Neither clearly leads. B2W Estimate starts at On request and RIB CostX at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, B2W Estimate or RIB CostX?
- B2W Estimate starts at On request and RIB CostX at On request.
- Does B2W Estimate or RIB CostX run on more platforms?
- B2W Estimate runs on Windows, Web. RIB CostX runs on Windows.
- What is B2W Estimate best used for?
- B2W Estimate is most often used for a grading contractor bids a 40 million dollar dot job and needs to test three crew configurations against the same quantities before the bid deadline, a utility contractor wants the production rates used in the winning bid pushed into field logging so the superintendent is measured against the estimate, an estimating department with four estimators needs several people working on separate sections of one bid without merging spreadsheets by hand, a contractor moving off heavybid wants a resource database it can reuse across estimating, dispatch and fleet maintenance. Of those, a grading contractor bids a 40 million dollar dot job and needs to test three crew configurations against the same quantities before the bid deadline and a utility contractor wants the production rates used in the winning bid pushed into field logging so the superintendent is measured against the estimate are not what RIB CostX is typically brought in for.
- What can B2W Estimate do that RIB CostX cannot?
- B2W Estimate covers Production-rate estimating, Central resource database, Concurrent bidding, DOT bid file export. RIB CostX covers 2D drawing takeoff, BIM and 3D takeoff, Live-linked workbooks, Drawing revision comparison.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
B2W Estimate: Is B2W Estimate still sold under its own name?
Yes. Trimble acquired B2W in 2022 and continues to sell it as B2W Estimate within the Trimble Construction portfolio.
RIB CostX: How much does RIB CostX cost?
RIB does not publish prices. It is quoted per package (Quantify, Core or Complete) and per seat, usually through a regional reseller.
B2W Estimate: Is there a perpetual licence?
Current sales are subscription based. Existing perpetual customers have been migrated toward subscription, so treat a perpetual arrangement as something to negotiate rather than assume.
RIB CostX: Is a perpetual licence available?
RIB has historically offered both perpetual and subscription licensing, with subscription now the default push. Ask explicitly, because the perpetual option is not advertised.
B2W Estimate: How does it compare with HeavyBid?
Both are production-rate estimators for heavy civil. B2W's argument is the shared resource database across estimating, field tracking, dispatch and maintenance; HeavyBid's is depth of bidding features and a large installed base in highway work.
RIB CostX: Does it do BIM takeoff or just 2D?
Both. Complete handles IFC and Revit models; Quantify and Core differ in workbook capability rather than measurement.
B2W Estimate: Does it work for building construction?
Poorly. It assumes self-performed work priced by crew output. Vertical builders bidding mostly subcontracted scopes should look elsewhere.
RIB CostX: Who is it for?
Quantity surveyors and estimators in markets that use bills of quantities: UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, the Middle East and South Africa above all.
RIB CostX: Can we open estimates without a licence?
A free CostX Viewer lets others open and inspect measured drawings and workbooks without a full seat.
Related pages
More on B2W Estimate
Other head to heads
- B2W Estimate vs PlanSwift
- B2W Estimate vs Sage Estimating
- B2W Estimate vs Procore
- B2W Estimate vs HCSS HeavyBid
- B2W Estimate vs HCSS
- B2W Estimate vs Cubit Estimating
- B2W Estimate vs Handoff
- B2W Estimate vs On-Screen Takeoff
- B2W Estimate vs STACK Construction Technologies
- B2W Estimate vs Builderbox
- B2W Estimate vs Togal.AI
- B2W Estimate vs Fieldwire
- B2W Estimate vs Primavera P6
- B2W Estimate vs Raken
- B2W Estimate vs Revit
- B2W Estimate vs Smartsheet
- B2W Estimate vs Vectorworks Architect
- B2W Estimate vs Bluebeam Revu
- B2W Estimate vs Dalux
- B2W Estimate vs Buildots
- B2W Estimate vs Autodesk Revit
- B2W Estimate vs Assignar
- B2W Estimate vs Billd
- B2W Estimate vs Bridgit Bravo
- RIB CostX vs PlanSwift
- RIB CostX vs Sage Estimating
- RIB CostX vs Procore
- RIB CostX vs HCSS HeavyBid
- RIB CostX vs HCSS
- RIB CostX vs Cubit Estimating
- RIB CostX vs Handoff
- RIB CostX vs On-Screen Takeoff
- RIB CostX vs STACK Construction Technologies
- RIB CostX vs Builderbox
- RIB CostX vs Togal.AI
- RIB CostX vs Fieldwire
- RIB CostX vs Primavera P6
- RIB CostX vs Raken
- RIB CostX vs Revit
- RIB CostX vs Smartsheet
- RIB CostX vs Vectorworks Architect
- RIB CostX vs Bluebeam Revu
- RIB CostX vs Dalux
- RIB CostX vs Buildots
- RIB CostX vs Autodesk Revit
- RIB CostX vs Assignar
- RIB CostX vs Billd
- RIB CostX vs Bridgit Bravo
