Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Spring Cloud Gateway

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Spring Cloud Gateway
APIs
API gateway built on Project Reactor for building microservices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Spring Cloud Gateway released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Spring Cloud Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | Spring Cloud Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | open-source |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Java, Spring Boot |
| Category | Cybersecurity | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 1998 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Spring Cloud Gateway
- Routing
- Path Rewriting
- Circuit Breaker
- Spring Boot
- Spring Security
- Spring Cloud
- Java support
- Spring Boot support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Spring Cloud Gateway
Spring Cloud Gateway
- API Developmentnot authentik
- API Gatewaynot authentik
- API Testingnot authentik
- API Documentationnot authentik
- Microservicesnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Spring Cloud Gateway
- Released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Spring Cloud Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core Spring Cloud Gateway
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Spring Cloud Gateway if
- You need routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Java, Spring Boot.
- You also want path rewriting.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Spring Cloud Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Spring Cloud Gateway?
- authentik starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free.
- Does authentik or Spring Cloud Gateway run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Spring Cloud Gateway runs on Java, Spring Boot.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Spring Cloud Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Spring Cloud Gateway cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing, Path Rewriting, Circuit Breaker, Spring Boot.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Spring Cloud Gateway: Is Spring Cloud Gateway free?
Yes, Spring Cloud Gateway is free and open-source software. It is part of the Spring ecosystem and available through GitHub repositories with open-source dependencies like spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webflux and spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webmvc.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Spring Cloud Gateway: What enterprise support is available for Spring Cloud Gateway?
Tanzu Spring provides optional enterprise support including Day 0 access to security patches for organizations requiring guaranteed support, but specific pricing is not published on the Spring Cloud Gateway project page.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Related pages
More on Spring Cloud Gateway
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Appwrite
- authentik vs Hasura
- authentik vs PocketBase
- authentik vs Sanity
- authentik vs Kong Gateway
- authentik vs Tyk
- authentik vs Janus Gateway
- authentik vs Convoy
- authentik vs WSO2 API Manager
- authentik vs Gravitee
- authentik vs KeystoneJS
- authentik vs Strapi
- authentik vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- authentik vs Thredd
- authentik vs Thunder Client
- authentik vs Toqio
- authentik vs Kong
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Authelia
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Logto
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Ory
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Passbolt
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Clerk
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs 1Password
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Frontegg
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs OWASP ZAP
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Infisical
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Chainguard
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Bitwarden
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Cosign
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs CyberGhost VPN
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Dahua Technology
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Descope
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Drata
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs DTiQ
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Ory Kratos
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Appwrite
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Hasura
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PocketBase
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Sanity
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Tyk
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Convoy
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Gravitee
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Strapi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thredd
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thunder Client
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Toqio
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong
