Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs KeystoneJS

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

KeystoneJS
APIs
Powerful Node.js headless CMS framework and API platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; KeystoneJS database support is limited to PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, KeystoneJS covers REST API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and KeystoneJS actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | KeystoneJS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | open-source |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Node.js, Self-hosted |
| Category | Cybersecurity | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in KeystoneJS
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- Admin interface
- Node.js
- Next.js
- React
- Databases
- Node.js support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot KeystoneJS
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot KeystoneJS
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot KeystoneJS
KeystoneJS
- Headless CMS implementationnot authentik
- Content management systemsnot authentik
- Customizable API-driven applicationsnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
KeystoneJS
- Database support is limited to PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite
- Keystone 5 is a separate legacy product documented on a different site and is not covered by the Keystone 6 docs
- Upgrading requires following a dedicated Migrate to 8.0.0 guide, so major versions are not drop-in
- Free support is a community Slack; enterprise-grade consulting and support is a separate paid engagement with Thinkmill and no published price
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
KeystoneJS
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full KeystoneJS
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose KeystoneJS if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Node.js, Self-hosted.
- You also want graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or KeystoneJS better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and KeystoneJS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or KeystoneJS?
- authentik starts at Free and KeystoneJS at Free.
- Does authentik or KeystoneJS run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. KeystoneJS runs on Node.js, Self-hosted.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what KeystoneJS is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that KeystoneJS cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. KeystoneJS covers REST API, GraphQL API, Admin interface, Node.js.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
KeystoneJS: Is KeystoneJS free?
Yes, KeystoneJS is free and open source with no licensing fees. Core platform has no lock-in and is contributed to by 250+ developers.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
KeystoneJS: What are hosting costs for KeystoneJS?
KeystoneJS is self-hosted and deployment-agnostic. Hosting costs depend on your chosen deployment platform (Vercel, AWS, Heroku, etc.) and infrastructure, not KeystoneJS itself.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
KeystoneJS: Does KeystoneJS offer paid support?
Enterprise support with tailored options is available from Thinkmill, the company behind KeystoneJS. Pricing details available upon request.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs PocketBase
- authentik vs Sanity
- authentik vs Appwrite
- authentik vs Hasura
- authentik vs Strapi
- authentik vs Parse Server
- authentik vs Payload CMS
- authentik vs Directus
- authentik vs Kong
- authentik vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- authentik vs Gravitee
- authentik vs Tyk
- authentik vs Trustly
- authentik vs Tuum
- authentik vs Unit
- authentik vs Vodeno
- authentik vs Weavr
- authentik vs Apollo GraphQL
- KeystoneJS vs Authelia
- KeystoneJS vs Logto
- KeystoneJS vs Ory
- KeystoneJS vs Passbolt
- KeystoneJS vs Clerk
- KeystoneJS vs 1Password
- KeystoneJS vs Frontegg
- KeystoneJS vs OWASP ZAP
- KeystoneJS vs Infisical
- KeystoneJS vs Chainguard
- KeystoneJS vs Bitwarden
- KeystoneJS vs Cosign
- KeystoneJS vs CyberGhost VPN
- KeystoneJS vs Dahua Technology
- KeystoneJS vs Descope
- KeystoneJS vs Drata
- KeystoneJS vs DTiQ
- KeystoneJS vs Ory Kratos
- KeystoneJS vs PocketBase
- KeystoneJS vs Sanity
- KeystoneJS vs Appwrite
- KeystoneJS vs Hasura
- KeystoneJS vs Strapi
- KeystoneJS vs Parse Server
- KeystoneJS vs Payload CMS
- KeystoneJS vs Directus
- KeystoneJS vs Kong
- KeystoneJS vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- KeystoneJS vs Gravitee
- KeystoneJS vs Tyk
- KeystoneJS vs Trustly
- KeystoneJS vs Tuum
- KeystoneJS vs Unit
- KeystoneJS vs Vodeno
- KeystoneJS vs Weavr
- KeystoneJS vs Apollo GraphQL
